Posts
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759)
Pay ATTENTION, The target is the US Constitution and anyone who fights to preserve the Document that speaks loud and clear to preserve TRUTH, Justice, Liberty, and the American way. Anyone who agrees with our Founding Fathers will be labeled and profiled a terrorist. NO kidding. Not a Conspiracy but a coming reality if you the AMERICAN do not take action to preserve your liberty.
“A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.” -Edward Abbey
ACTION ALERT - STOP FEMA CAMP and GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION NOW!
So sad America as we knew it from the past and this present will be destroyed if Americans do not stand up for our Constitution and morality. That means Repent to the the one who is Sovereign right now, The KING OF KINGS who sits at the right hand of the Father. JESUS. Let us truly humble ourselves and PRAY and Ask for mercy for our Nation and our leaders souls who are in rebellion against OUR Creator.
May he spare us with his mercy still.
Matthew 6:33
But seek ( aim at and strive after) first of all His kingdom and His righteousness ( His way of doing and being right), and then all these things taken together will be given you besides.
RW
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Friday, January 30, 2009
The Super Bowl Commercial purposely axed from view.
It is time to go to WAR with the Immorally biased MEDIA and NETWORKS who continue to trodden down our Constitution, THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
AMERICAN STEP UP TO THE PLATE WILL YOU?
WHAT NBC STRUCK FROM THE SUPERBOWL ADS. And the Network giants and advocates of the liberal confusion want a fairness doctrine?
The Super Bowl Commercial You Won't See Onenewsnow.com
That wonderful pro-life Obama commercial you may have seen here recently was supposed to run during the Super Bowl on Sunday. After first accepting it, NBC apparently changed its collective mind, saying it wasn't going to run advocacy ads during the big game.
Brian Burch, President of Fidelis, a Chicago-based Catholic organization responsible for the commercial, says that NBC initially responded positively and he was raising money to pay for it. Watch the commercial below, and imagine the impact it could have had on the millions who watch the Super Bowl.
AMERICAN STEP UP TO THE PLATE WILL YOU?
WHAT NBC STRUCK FROM THE SUPERBOWL ADS. And the Network giants and advocates of the liberal confusion want a fairness doctrine?
The Super Bowl Commercial You Won't See Onenewsnow.com
That wonderful pro-life Obama commercial you may have seen here recently was supposed to run during the Super Bowl on Sunday. After first accepting it, NBC apparently changed its collective mind, saying it wasn't going to run advocacy ads during the big game.
Brian Burch, President of Fidelis, a Chicago-based Catholic organization responsible for the commercial, says that NBC initially responded positively and he was raising money to pay for it. Watch the commercial below, and imagine the impact it could have had on the millions who watch the Super Bowl.
Immoral accepting Media Is A Threat to Democracy.
Commentary. Article speaks for itself.
Goldberg Says Liberal Media Is A Threat to Democracy
by Human Events http://www.humanevents.com
01/26/2009
Media bias is nothing new to conservatives. We’ve seen it all our lives. But bias is one thing, and political activism is something else entirely.
In the 2008 presidential race, the media finally crossed the line. Says author and media critic Bernard Goldberg, it’s no longer an issue of bias: the media are political activists, broadcasting campaign ads for Democrats disguised as news stories.
How bad did it get? Goldberg’s new book, “A Slobbering Love Affair,” paints a vivid picture of how bad it gets.
Goldberg writes of the clown show at MSNBC, “Chris Matthews is a journalist hooker putting out for Obama from the moment the senator showed some leg.”
“A Slobbering Love Affair” (published by HUMAN EVENTS’ sister company Regnery Publishing) -- just out today -- concludes we’ve now entered “Bamalot”: where the media are so invested in Obama’s success that they’ll do anything to help him succeed. And if reporters won’t perform their basic function in telling Americans the truth about their government, democracy cannot function.
Here are some excerpts from “A Slobbering Love Affair”:
Most Journalists Don't Even Know They Are Biased
I know these people, I used to work with them, and I can assure you that if you hooked even the most biased reporter up to a lie detector machine, while he was swearing that he was not in the tank for Barack Obama the needle on the polygraph wouldn’t budge, not even a little. (p. 13)
…they [journalists] work in liberal newsrooms imbued with liberal sensibilities. And so they are like fish in the ocean that don’t know they’re wet. How would fish know they’re wet? Fish have no frame of reference. They only know wet. And, yes, it is the same with the journalistic fish who swim in America’s big mainstream liberal newsrooms. They don’t fully understand how their liberalism affects their news judgment. (pp. 66-67)
On the Role of American Media
Goldberg relates the story of an exchange with a college professor, who asked:
“Isn’t it the role of the media to effect change in society?”
It was a statement posing as a question.
“Your change or mine?” I asked.
Silence. After a while, I thought that I had either gone deaf or that the phone went dead. It had never occurred to this supposedly well-educated liberal man who taught liberal kids at a liberal college that change comes in more than one package. My change, I explained to him, would be very different from his.…It is not the media’s role to effect change -- either the professor’s kind or mine. And while we’re on the subject, it is not the media’s role to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, even though this is taken as gospel in America’s liberal newsrooms. It is the media’s role to report the news, not to advocate for causes, no matter how noble journalists think the cause might be. (pp. 2-3)
"Clueless" Chris Matthews, The Journalistic Hooker
Matthews had just heard Obama give a victory speech and had to share his innermost thoughts -- no, make that his innermost feelings -- with all of us. “I felt this thrill going up my leg,” Matthews blurted out. Yes, Chris heard a politician speak and it sent a thrill running up his leg. Memo to Chris Matthews: This is not political analysis. This is a man crush! Matthews, who might as well have been wearing a short skirt and carrying pom-poms emblazoned with a big O, was madly in love with Obama and he didn’t care if the whole world knew it….Matthews also told Leno that night that Barack and Michelle Obama are, “cool people. They are really cool. They’re Jack and Jackie Kennedy when you see them together. They are cool. And they’re great looking and they’re cool….Everything seems to be great. I know I’m selling him now. I’m not supposed to sell.” I disagree. Hookers sell all the time. That’s what they do. And Chris Matthews, whatever else he may or may not be, is a journalist hooker who was putting out for Obama from the moment the senator showed some leg and decided to run for president of the United States. (pp. 24-25)
White Liberal Guilt
There are deep reasons why so many white journalists sold out their principles for Obama. In no small way, they were trying to redeem their own racial virtue. “Since the sixties, whites have had to prove a negative -- that they are not racist,” is how the scholar Shelby Steele explained it in an essay entitled, “Liberal Bias and the Zone of Decency.” Sure, they wanted to make their Messiah look good. But even more important, they wanted to feel good -- about themselves! (pp. 42-43)
Palin Derangement Syndrome
I have a theory. What drives some of them nuts is not just that they think she’s unqualified to be vice president, or certainly president, of the United States. As I said before, that’s a perfectly legitimate point of view. What makes these liberals foam at the mouth is that this “white trash,” pro-gun, pro-life, church-going woman, who didn’t to go to Harvard or Yale or Princeton, but who flitted from one second-rate school to another before she wound up (my God, they groaned) at the University of Idaho, became the most prominent woman in all of America! (p. 49)
Rush Limbaugh Explains the Media's Unabashed Liberalism
Goldberg: “Is there anything -- anything -- the mainstream media can do that will help them regain the trust of the American people -- and if so, will they do it?
Limbaugh: “…I believe the creation of the New Media has made the mainstream media now openly competitive with the New Media, which is why they are so open now about choosing sides…since I started in 1988, look at what has happened. There were 125 talk stations in 1988. Now there are over 2,000. Right-wing blogs have sprung up. FOX News prime time is simply talk radio on TV. So all this New Media pisses off the mainstream media. They are in open competition with us and as such have now been forced to openly declare what they used to hide behind their so-called objectivity: and that is their liberalism.” (pp. 55-56)
Who Beat John McCain?
As corrupt as the media were during the presidential campaign of 2008, the mainstream media did not defeat John McCain. They may have cost him a percentage point, but that’s about it. (p. 147)
Now Republicans have to take stock. They have to be introspective. They can’t blame the media for all their problems. They have to admit their mistakes and figure out where to go from here, or they will continue to lose elections. The good news for the GOP is that they have some interesting thinkers in their ranks -- people like Newt Gingrich and Michael Steele and a few governors like Haley Barbour of Mississippi, Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, and Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota. They will figure out, I think, how to regain the trust of the American people. And that just happens to be the very same challenge facing the mainstream media. How will they regain the trust of the American people? History suggests they have a much bigger problem on their hands than do the Republicans. Politicians care what regular folks think, if for no other reason than they need regular folks to survive. The mainstream media don’t give a damn what regular folks think. They haven’t cared for years. Why change now, especially since their guy just won? (pp. 149-150)
Welcome to Bamalot
In his acceptance speech, Obama laid the groundwork. “The road ahead will be long,” he told us. “Our climb will be steep. We may not get there in one year or even one term” -- thus inoculating himself if he comes up short. And the mainstream media, I think, will carry that idea with them, because of the huge investment they made in his success. They will set up a construct in which all that turns out good will be to President Obama’s credit. All that turns out bad will be Bush’s fault. In other words, heads Obama wins, tails Bush loses. Although it’s too late for the media to redeem its coverage of the 2008 election, they can still hold Obama accountable as president. They should closely examine his early actions in office, especially if he issues executive orders, and report promptly any of his decisions that may function as rewards for his campaign donors and other influential supporters. I hope we don’t have to wait too long to see those kinds of stories. But the media did work hard to get Obama elected, didn’t they? So the question now is: will they risk undermining him in order to bring to the American people something as trivial as honest reporting? (pp. 156-157)
The Fix
Here’s my solution to the problem of media bias: diversity. What journalism needs is more diversity. And not just the kind we’ve grown accustomed to. Journalism needs an affirmative action program for the smallest minority in America’s newsrooms: conservatives. (p. 159)
But please understand, I don’t want these conservatives slanting the news to the right anymore than I want liberal journalists slanting it to the left. All most of us want is some fairness, and we think that diversity that goes beyond skin color and sex and ethnicity can provide it. Over the years we made sure that our newsrooms look like America. Now we need them to think a little more like America. Who could argue with that? (p.161)
Thursday, January 29, 2009
You the taxpayer must pay for HANDS that shed innocent blood. The Selfish War continues against the unborn Human RACE
Jeremiah 22:17
But your eyes and your heart are only for your covetousness and dishonest gain, for shedding innocent blood, for oppression and doing violence.
How does it feel knowing that everything you are earning, buying, paying etc. etc. in the form of taxes, State and Federal, in GOD BLESS AMERICA is going to Government federally funded unborn human slaughter houses? And we are STILL supposed to believe that these butchers took a Hippocratic oath to preserve life to the fullest? We are STILL force fed that if we disallow abortion we are criminalizing women? Now what selfish tyrant came up with that false assumption? Why is the truth a lie? These are question that continue to go on and on and those in power do not practice listening to WE THE PEOPLE. It is a Politician fraternity tradition I presume. Abortion is the worst form of racism this world has ever seen and it is bewildering that it continues on and is accepted by humans that were gracefully allowed to be born. What an oxymoron to the fullest. And now it continues and we continue to pay for this atrocity.
Oh LORD you show mercy continously but we are showing how undeserving we really are.
How long will your mercy last to those who continue to those of us sin against you?
RW 01/03/09
WND Exclusive MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH
Obama pick: Taxpayers must fund abortions
Nominee takes position that 'contradicts' Constitution
Posted: January 27, 2009
10:07 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
President Obama's nominee for deputy secretary of state contends American taxpayers are required to pay for abortions, a position that contradicts the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution.
James B. Steinberg's written testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was highlighted by Sen. Jim DeMint, a pro-life Republican serving South Carolina.
In a written response to DeMint's questions, Steinberg said the Mexico City policy -- the newly overturned policy that forbade taxpayer subsidization of abortions overseas -- "is an unnecessary restriction that, if applied to organizations based in this country, would be an unconstitutional limitation on free speech."
Not so, said DeMint, pointing out Steinberg's stance is in direct opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court.
(Story continues below)
DeMint cited the 1991 Rust vs. Sullivan decision in which the court ruled, "The government has no constitutional duty to subsidize an activity merely because it is constitutionally protected, and may validly choose to allocate public funds for medical services relating to childbirth but not to abortion."
DeMint had asked: "For more than 30 years the Hyde amendments, which prohibit federal funding for abortion services, have been supported by Republican and Democrat administrations and Congresses. Unfortunately, while this is the domestic policy of the United States, President Obama has vowed to reverse our foreign policy by repealing the Mexico City policy and use the federal taxpayer dollars to fund abortion services overseas. Do you support President Obama's efforts to lift the Mexico City restrictions? Do you believe our foreign policy should contradict long held domestic policies?"
Steinberg's complete response was, "President Obama has supported repeal of the Mexico City policy, as has Secretary Clinton. Longstanding law, authored by Senator Jesse Helms, expressly prohibits the use of U.S. funds [for] abortion. The Mexico City policy is an unnecessary restriction that, if applied to organizations based in this country, would be an unconstitutional limitation on free speech."
Just days ago, Obama imposed an executive order repealing the Mexico City policy that during President Bush's tenure protected Americans from being required to fund groups that promote and pay for abortions around the globe.
The plan was originated by President Reagan in 1984. It prohibited non-governmental organizations that receive federal funds from providing or promoting abortions in other nations. President Clinton rescinded the rule Jan. 22, 1993, calling it "excessively broad" and "unwarranted."
But when President Bush took office in January 2001, he immediately issued an executive order reinstituting the pro-life policy.
"It is my conviction that taxpayer funds should not be used to pay for abortion or actively promote abortion," Bush said.
International Planned Parenthood Federation and other abortion groups refused to conform to the ban. They continued to provide and promote abortions and, consequently, were denied access to funding from U.S. taxpayers.
A Jan. 16 letter from 77 members of Congress posted by Life News had urged Obama to continue the ban.
"[T]his policy is important because it establishes a bright line between family planning activities and abortion, therefore ensuring that United States family planning funds are not co-opted by groups who promote abortion as a method of family planning," the letter stated. "Such activities would send a wrong message overseas that the United States promotes abortion."
Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council told the Washington Post, "President Obama issued executive orders banning the torture of terrorists but ... signed an order that exports the torture of unborn children around the world."
Perkins noted that Obama vowed at the debate with Republican candidate Sen. John McCain last fall at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church to find "common ground" on the issue of abortion and that he, as president, would work to "reduce the number of abortions."
"His action today flies in the face of that vow and probably sets a record as the most quickly broken campaign promise ever," Perkins said.
The Rust vs. Sullivan decision says rules and regulations regarding abortion funding were consistent with the Constitution.
"Indeed, the legislative history demonstrates that Congress intended that Title X funds be kept separate and distinct from abortion-related activities," the opinion said.
"The regulations do not violate the First Amendment free speech rights of private Title X fund recipients, their staffs, or their patients by impermissibly imposing viewpoint-discriminatory conditions on Government subsidies. There is no question but that [the] prohibition is constitutional, since the government may make a value judgment favoring childbirth over abortion, and implement that judgment by the allocation of public funds," the opinion continued.
"Similarly, in implementing the statutory prohibition by forbidding counseling, referral, and the provision of information regarding abortion as a method of family planning, the regulations simply ensure that appropriated funds are not used for activities, including speech, that are outside the federal program's scope."
As a state lawmaker in Illinois, Obama opposed mandated physician help for babies who survive abortions.
The president has promised to sign the "Freedom of Choice Act," a sweeping bill that would abolish pro-life rules and regulations across the nation.
The organization FightFOCA.com, launched to oppose the plan, already has collected 500,000 signatures in opposition.
According to Pastor Rick Scorborough of Vision America, more than 500 state, federal and local laws would be destroyed by the action.
"There are not enough words to convey the seriousness of this piece of legislation. Now is not the time to bury our heads in the sand and hope this will go away. It won't. If we don't do something about it, the basic fundamental right to be born will be taken from millions of unborn children, ironically, in the name of 'freedom,'" Scarborough wrote.
Among the laws that would be overturned are the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, the Hyde Amendment restricting taxpayer funding of abortions inside the U.S., informed consent laws, waiting period laws, parental consent and notification laws, requirements that abortion businesses follow health regulations, a ban on non-physicians doing abortions and bans on abortions of babies who can survive outside the womb.
But your eyes and your heart are only for your covetousness and dishonest gain, for shedding innocent blood, for oppression and doing violence.
How does it feel knowing that everything you are earning, buying, paying etc. etc. in the form of taxes, State and Federal, in GOD BLESS AMERICA is going to Government federally funded unborn human slaughter houses? And we are STILL supposed to believe that these butchers took a Hippocratic oath to preserve life to the fullest? We are STILL force fed that if we disallow abortion we are criminalizing women? Now what selfish tyrant came up with that false assumption? Why is the truth a lie? These are question that continue to go on and on and those in power do not practice listening to WE THE PEOPLE. It is a Politician fraternity tradition I presume. Abortion is the worst form of racism this world has ever seen and it is bewildering that it continues on and is accepted by humans that were gracefully allowed to be born. What an oxymoron to the fullest. And now it continues and we continue to pay for this atrocity.
Oh LORD you show mercy continously but we are showing how undeserving we really are.
How long will your mercy last to those who continue to those of us sin against you?
RW 01/03/09
WND Exclusive MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH
Obama pick: Taxpayers must fund abortions
Nominee takes position that 'contradicts' Constitution
Posted: January 27, 2009
10:07 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
President Obama's nominee for deputy secretary of state contends American taxpayers are required to pay for abortions, a position that contradicts the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the Constitution.
James B. Steinberg's written testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee was highlighted by Sen. Jim DeMint, a pro-life Republican serving South Carolina.
In a written response to DeMint's questions, Steinberg said the Mexico City policy -- the newly overturned policy that forbade taxpayer subsidization of abortions overseas -- "is an unnecessary restriction that, if applied to organizations based in this country, would be an unconstitutional limitation on free speech."
Not so, said DeMint, pointing out Steinberg's stance is in direct opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court.
(Story continues below)
DeMint cited the 1991 Rust vs. Sullivan decision in which the court ruled, "The government has no constitutional duty to subsidize an activity merely because it is constitutionally protected, and may validly choose to allocate public funds for medical services relating to childbirth but not to abortion."
DeMint had asked: "For more than 30 years the Hyde amendments, which prohibit federal funding for abortion services, have been supported by Republican and Democrat administrations and Congresses. Unfortunately, while this is the domestic policy of the United States, President Obama has vowed to reverse our foreign policy by repealing the Mexico City policy and use the federal taxpayer dollars to fund abortion services overseas. Do you support President Obama's efforts to lift the Mexico City restrictions? Do you believe our foreign policy should contradict long held domestic policies?"
Steinberg's complete response was, "President Obama has supported repeal of the Mexico City policy, as has Secretary Clinton. Longstanding law, authored by Senator Jesse Helms, expressly prohibits the use of U.S. funds [for] abortion. The Mexico City policy is an unnecessary restriction that, if applied to organizations based in this country, would be an unconstitutional limitation on free speech."
Just days ago, Obama imposed an executive order repealing the Mexico City policy that during President Bush's tenure protected Americans from being required to fund groups that promote and pay for abortions around the globe.
The plan was originated by President Reagan in 1984. It prohibited non-governmental organizations that receive federal funds from providing or promoting abortions in other nations. President Clinton rescinded the rule Jan. 22, 1993, calling it "excessively broad" and "unwarranted."
But when President Bush took office in January 2001, he immediately issued an executive order reinstituting the pro-life policy.
"It is my conviction that taxpayer funds should not be used to pay for abortion or actively promote abortion," Bush said.
International Planned Parenthood Federation and other abortion groups refused to conform to the ban. They continued to provide and promote abortions and, consequently, were denied access to funding from U.S. taxpayers.
A Jan. 16 letter from 77 members of Congress posted by Life News had urged Obama to continue the ban.
"[T]his policy is important because it establishes a bright line between family planning activities and abortion, therefore ensuring that United States family planning funds are not co-opted by groups who promote abortion as a method of family planning," the letter stated. "Such activities would send a wrong message overseas that the United States promotes abortion."
Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council told the Washington Post, "President Obama issued executive orders banning the torture of terrorists but ... signed an order that exports the torture of unborn children around the world."
Perkins noted that Obama vowed at the debate with Republican candidate Sen. John McCain last fall at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church to find "common ground" on the issue of abortion and that he, as president, would work to "reduce the number of abortions."
"His action today flies in the face of that vow and probably sets a record as the most quickly broken campaign promise ever," Perkins said.
The Rust vs. Sullivan decision says rules and regulations regarding abortion funding were consistent with the Constitution.
"Indeed, the legislative history demonstrates that Congress intended that Title X funds be kept separate and distinct from abortion-related activities," the opinion said.
"The regulations do not violate the First Amendment free speech rights of private Title X fund recipients, their staffs, or their patients by impermissibly imposing viewpoint-discriminatory conditions on Government subsidies. There is no question but that [the] prohibition is constitutional, since the government may make a value judgment favoring childbirth over abortion, and implement that judgment by the allocation of public funds," the opinion continued.
"Similarly, in implementing the statutory prohibition by forbidding counseling, referral, and the provision of information regarding abortion as a method of family planning, the regulations simply ensure that appropriated funds are not used for activities, including speech, that are outside the federal program's scope."
As a state lawmaker in Illinois, Obama opposed mandated physician help for babies who survive abortions.
The president has promised to sign the "Freedom of Choice Act," a sweeping bill that would abolish pro-life rules and regulations across the nation.
The organization FightFOCA.com, launched to oppose the plan, already has collected 500,000 signatures in opposition.
According to Pastor Rick Scorborough of Vision America, more than 500 state, federal and local laws would be destroyed by the action.
"There are not enough words to convey the seriousness of this piece of legislation. Now is not the time to bury our heads in the sand and hope this will go away. It won't. If we don't do something about it, the basic fundamental right to be born will be taken from millions of unborn children, ironically, in the name of 'freedom,'" Scarborough wrote.
Among the laws that would be overturned are the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003, the Hyde Amendment restricting taxpayer funding of abortions inside the U.S., informed consent laws, waiting period laws, parental consent and notification laws, requirements that abortion businesses follow health regulations, a ban on non-physicians doing abortions and bans on abortions of babies who can survive outside the womb.
Democrats take Limbaugh's comment out of context
Psalm 120:2
Deliver me, O Lord, from lying lips and from deceitful tongues.
Commentary: Actually I can't stand Limbaugh as much as the next guy and I think sometimes the man is brutally arrogant in allot of ways and barks up the wrong tree most of the time except for MORAL issues. I may also agree with Rush in some issues but some of his other rhetoric is sometimes seemly taken way out context on some of the issues he commits too. And you just really can't personally take the speck out of someones eye when you have a log in yours correct? which most of these way out in left field Conservatives do. I consider myself more and likely on the Moral conservative side but when most of the Talk Radio hosts are not Christ centered and completely Scriptural when they approach a political topic then I just treat it as second rate information. But this issue and attack from the Immoral left Dems against RUSH is really just another lame stunt that is normal for well the left character as always. RIGHT MINNESOTA? They make sure they propagandize and take things out of context so ludicrous so they can reel you in so to speak and blind your minds from truth. RIGHT OBAMA AND YOUR ELIGIBILITY. Even I was disturbed by the lastest attacks by the immorally owned Corp American media from the secular sewers. I do not even listen to Limbaugh but listen to both sides and I am just not surprised anymore.
FOR example:
DCCC version: “If I wanted Obama to succeed, I’d be happy the Republicans have laid down. [EDIT] I don’t want this to work. So I’m thinking about replying to the guy, 'Okay, I”ll send you a response, but I don’t need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails.'”
What Limbaugh REALLY said: "If I wanted Obama to succeed, I'd be happy the Republicans have laid down. And I would be encouraging Republicans to lay down and support him. Look, what he's talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the U.S. government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don't want this to work. So I'm thinking of replying to the guy, "Okay, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails."
Now we have the first amendment to express our opinion freely correct? For both sides. Now why cannot RUSH have his say anymore in context? Are we supposed to petition everyone who debates and issue? Is this another scheme for the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE ACT again? TO control free speech on the TALK RADIO AIRWAVES? TO FORCE POLITICALLY CORRECTNESS. EGHADS! I can understand explicit immoral conversations of the perverse natures, but clean talk radio on Politics so each side has a fair response WHAT?? How ridiculous. We already have that and that is called CONGRESS, the SENATE and the HOUSE OF REPS. NO HUMAN HAS THE RIGHT OR FREEWILL TO CONTROL FREE SPEECH GET IT? And we also have liberal radio and conservative radio. HELLO! We have the American media which is truly mostly one sided and or biased, right last 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN?
Please reader, come to the knowledge of the real TRUTH in Christ JESUS so all the immoralISMS of each Political party will become transparent because you will be able challenge all things with GOD'S HOLY WORD and you will see the false exposed by the REAL TRUTH. And then you will see true FAIRNESS.
RW Jan 29 2009
Democrats Edit: Take Limbaugh's 'Want Obama to Fail' Comment Out of Context
[Democrats Launch Petition Against Rush Limbaugh]
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
By Susan Jones, Senior Editor
CNSNews.com
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee launches 'Help Stop Rush' petition. (From DCCC Web site)
(CNSNews.com) - The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is running an audio clip on its Web site that misrepresents what radio host Rush Limbaugh meant when he said on his Friday, Jan. 16 radio program that he wanted President Obama "to fail."
The audio clip, as played by the DCCC, omits a key sentence, as follows:
DCCC version: “If I wanted Obama to succeed, I’d be happy the Republicans have laid down. [EDIT] I don’t want this to work. So I’m thinking about replying to the guy, 'Okay, I”ll send you a response, but I don’t need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails.'”
What Limbaugh said: "If I wanted Obama to succeed, I'd be happy the Republicans have laid down. And I would be encouraging Republicans to lay down and support him. Look, what he's talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the U.S. government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don't want this to work. So I'm thinking of replying to the guy, "Okay, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails."
Limbaugh, on his Jan. 16 radio program, also made the point that no liberals hoped President Bush would succeed. Nevertheless, Limbaugh continued, Obama "is the president of the United States, he's my president, he's a human being, and his ideas and policies are what count for me, not his skin color, not his past, not whatever ties he doesn't have to being down with the struggle, all of that's irrelevant to me. We're talking about my country, the United States of America, my nieces, my nephews, your kids, your grandkids. Why in the world do we want to saddle them with more liberalism and socialism? Why would I want to do that? So I can answer it, four words, 'I hope he fails.' And that would be the most outrageous thing anybody in this climate could say. Shows you just how far gone we are. Well, I know, I know. I am the last man standing."
On subsequent radio programs, Limbaugh has talked about people "misunderstanding" his remark.
On his Friday, Jan. 23 program -- reviewing the week -- Limbaugh explained that he supports Obama -- he just doesn't support Obama's policies. "I don't support the nationalization of the banks, which has happened. I don't support the nationalization of the auto companies. I don't support the nationalization of the mortgage business. I don't like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd running things. And I don't want that to continue," Limbaugh said.
And on his Tuesday, Jan. 27 program at one point, Limbaugh referred to President Obama telling Republicans to ignore Limbaugh: "The president of the United States hopes I fail," Limbaugh said.
Democrats and liberal groups have misrepresented Limbaugh’s words and meaning on previous occasions, most notably bashing him two years ago for using the term "phony soldiers" to describe Jesse Macbeth, who was sentenced to five months in prison for falsifying his military records.
A group that wanted Limbaugh removed from taxpayer-supported Armed Forces Radio claimed that Limbaugh had used the term "phony soldiers" to describe all soldiers who had spoken against the Iraq war.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, wading into the controversy, gave a speech on the Senate floor, condemning Limbaugh and urging his colleagues to send a letter of complaint to the chairman of Clear Channel Communications, which syndicates Limbaugh’s radio show.
Limbaugh turned tables on Reid, however. In October 2007, the radio host auctioned off the letter that Reid sent to the CEO of Clear Channel Communications demanding that Limbaugh be censured and forced to apologize to U.S. servicemen.
The winning bid on eBay was $2.1 million, which Limbaugh matched – raising $4.2 million for the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation, which serves children of fallen Marines and law enforcement officers.
See Related Stories:
Deliver me, O Lord, from lying lips and from deceitful tongues.
Commentary: Actually I can't stand Limbaugh as much as the next guy and I think sometimes the man is brutally arrogant in allot of ways and barks up the wrong tree most of the time except for MORAL issues. I may also agree with Rush in some issues but some of his other rhetoric is sometimes seemly taken way out context on some of the issues he commits too. And you just really can't personally take the speck out of someones eye when you have a log in yours correct? which most of these way out in left field Conservatives do. I consider myself more and likely on the Moral conservative side but when most of the Talk Radio hosts are not Christ centered and completely Scriptural when they approach a political topic then I just treat it as second rate information. But this issue and attack from the Immoral left Dems against RUSH is really just another lame stunt that is normal for well the left character as always. RIGHT MINNESOTA? They make sure they propagandize and take things out of context so ludicrous so they can reel you in so to speak and blind your minds from truth. RIGHT OBAMA AND YOUR ELIGIBILITY. Even I was disturbed by the lastest attacks by the immorally owned Corp American media from the secular sewers. I do not even listen to Limbaugh but listen to both sides and I am just not surprised anymore.
FOR example:
DCCC version: “If I wanted Obama to succeed, I’d be happy the Republicans have laid down. [EDIT] I don’t want this to work. So I’m thinking about replying to the guy, 'Okay, I”ll send you a response, but I don’t need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails.'”
What Limbaugh REALLY said: "If I wanted Obama to succeed, I'd be happy the Republicans have laid down. And I would be encouraging Republicans to lay down and support him. Look, what he's talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the U.S. government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don't want this to work. So I'm thinking of replying to the guy, "Okay, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails."
Now we have the first amendment to express our opinion freely correct? For both sides. Now why cannot RUSH have his say anymore in context? Are we supposed to petition everyone who debates and issue? Is this another scheme for the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE ACT again? TO control free speech on the TALK RADIO AIRWAVES? TO FORCE POLITICALLY CORRECTNESS. EGHADS! I can understand explicit immoral conversations of the perverse natures, but clean talk radio on Politics so each side has a fair response WHAT?? How ridiculous. We already have that and that is called CONGRESS, the SENATE and the HOUSE OF REPS. NO HUMAN HAS THE RIGHT OR FREEWILL TO CONTROL FREE SPEECH GET IT? And we also have liberal radio and conservative radio. HELLO! We have the American media which is truly mostly one sided and or biased, right last 2008 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN?
Please reader, come to the knowledge of the real TRUTH in Christ JESUS so all the immoralISMS of each Political party will become transparent because you will be able challenge all things with GOD'S HOLY WORD and you will see the false exposed by the REAL TRUTH. And then you will see true FAIRNESS.
RW Jan 29 2009
Democrats Edit: Take Limbaugh's 'Want Obama to Fail' Comment Out of Context
[Democrats Launch Petition Against Rush Limbaugh]
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
By Susan Jones, Senior Editor
CNSNews.com
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee launches 'Help Stop Rush' petition. (From DCCC Web site)
(CNSNews.com) - The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is running an audio clip on its Web site that misrepresents what radio host Rush Limbaugh meant when he said on his Friday, Jan. 16 radio program that he wanted President Obama "to fail."
The audio clip, as played by the DCCC, omits a key sentence, as follows:
DCCC version: “If I wanted Obama to succeed, I’d be happy the Republicans have laid down. [EDIT] I don’t want this to work. So I’m thinking about replying to the guy, 'Okay, I”ll send you a response, but I don’t need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails.'”
What Limbaugh said: "If I wanted Obama to succeed, I'd be happy the Republicans have laid down. And I would be encouraging Republicans to lay down and support him. Look, what he's talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the U.S. government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don't want this to work. So I'm thinking of replying to the guy, "Okay, I'll send you a response, but I don't need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails."
Limbaugh, on his Jan. 16 radio program, also made the point that no liberals hoped President Bush would succeed. Nevertheless, Limbaugh continued, Obama "is the president of the United States, he's my president, he's a human being, and his ideas and policies are what count for me, not his skin color, not his past, not whatever ties he doesn't have to being down with the struggle, all of that's irrelevant to me. We're talking about my country, the United States of America, my nieces, my nephews, your kids, your grandkids. Why in the world do we want to saddle them with more liberalism and socialism? Why would I want to do that? So I can answer it, four words, 'I hope he fails.' And that would be the most outrageous thing anybody in this climate could say. Shows you just how far gone we are. Well, I know, I know. I am the last man standing."
On subsequent radio programs, Limbaugh has talked about people "misunderstanding" his remark.
On his Friday, Jan. 23 program -- reviewing the week -- Limbaugh explained that he supports Obama -- he just doesn't support Obama's policies. "I don't support the nationalization of the banks, which has happened. I don't support the nationalization of the auto companies. I don't support the nationalization of the mortgage business. I don't like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd running things. And I don't want that to continue," Limbaugh said.
And on his Tuesday, Jan. 27 program at one point, Limbaugh referred to President Obama telling Republicans to ignore Limbaugh: "The president of the United States hopes I fail," Limbaugh said.
Democrats and liberal groups have misrepresented Limbaugh’s words and meaning on previous occasions, most notably bashing him two years ago for using the term "phony soldiers" to describe Jesse Macbeth, who was sentenced to five months in prison for falsifying his military records.
A group that wanted Limbaugh removed from taxpayer-supported Armed Forces Radio claimed that Limbaugh had used the term "phony soldiers" to describe all soldiers who had spoken against the Iraq war.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, wading into the controversy, gave a speech on the Senate floor, condemning Limbaugh and urging his colleagues to send a letter of complaint to the chairman of Clear Channel Communications, which syndicates Limbaugh’s radio show.
Limbaugh turned tables on Reid, however. In October 2007, the radio host auctioned off the letter that Reid sent to the CEO of Clear Channel Communications demanding that Limbaugh be censured and forced to apologize to U.S. servicemen.
The winning bid on eBay was $2.1 million, which Limbaugh matched – raising $4.2 million for the Marine Corps-Law Enforcement Foundation, which serves children of fallen Marines and law enforcement officers.
See Related Stories:
Is it truly a conspiracy that they killed the EV-1 and other electric cars? See for yourself.
COMMENTARY:{see movies below)
I seen and heard about this years back and I wonder if possibly this is old news but was glad it resurfaced and was on YOUTUBE still and not removed by special interest or whomever does not want the American people to know about this. Isn't it just wonderful they really think that most Americans are stupid and they can get away with whatever because their money hides them from wrongdoing? NOT! I still like GAS POWERED Vehicles particularly muscle cars and 4x4's of old and the old 92 beast God gave me for next to nothing that runs exceptional still does me just fine I have no complaints. There is nothing like a "Killer ride dude" that muscles its way down the highway sounding like 1000 horses (oaoaoaoaoaoao grunting like Tim the tool man Taylor).
But finally they came up with an electric car that actually ran for 300 miles and I just bet they were coming up with a alternator that would continue a charge to where eventually it would run across the States and back on a charge. That is 6000 round trip if I am not over exaggerating to which I probably am. But just Imagine a car always able to go until it finally quits and you get a lot of miles and years out of it with barley any problems in the long run. I heard they were almost there until some greedy fiends pulled the plug and destroyed every electric car because we cannot have people actually out of their control can we? It takes me back to the old Dodge Dart slant 6 motor. Wow what an engine this was. I had one once, a 1964 push button transmission automatic 4 door that I believe was at least 30 miles or more a gallon if I remember right or I could be wrong but it did get allot mileage between fuel ups by far and this was a very tough engine. But Chrysler scratchedWhen it became apparent the marketplace actually wanted these cars, it rounded then all up and destroyed them.
Not a conspiracy theory. This is what actually happened. that winning model becuase that engine just was the engine that always could and was an engine that was like the energizer bunny still going and going etc. etc. You can still see a Dodge Dart, Plymouth Valiant, etc Slant 6 engine form the early 60's still just hauling away because they could not destroy all them like they did the electric cars. Did you remember the electric car that went a top speed of 200 or more or so on the Salt flats? And do you remember the electric cars sold in LA was going to be the Standard push for all residence back then to have one? Why cannot people have the option to have a gas guzzler or an electric car in the free market to compete? And who to really say what the people want and demand? You cannot base a market place on assumptions like gambling to which that is what 90% of our financial institutions are based on. Gambling and borrowing against PAPER. Yes people, paper money that is not worth anything but the same as toilet paper runs this whole madness. Gold coins, silver coins, bronze coins, or rocks used to run the show or how much cattle and crops you has was truly worth something. It is no wonder we are having a crash. GOD owns everything and this well is another warning judgment of GOD's common grace to mankind who continue to ignore HIM willfully and worship the creator rather than their Creator.
Just to say to the Hoards who are responsible, Do worry to hard or should I say worry so much because you will be caught eventually. It just depends how long GOD allows your season of treachery to last and when it is finished, just remember GOD is Sovereign and HIS judgment will be worse for you and everything you hold onto that is your idol called mammon. But in the meantime keep sweating you Corporate and Shadow Government hoards because your time of sin is over really soon. GOD must punish sinners who reject HIS righteous ways and will bring the final JUSTICE. IT is never to late too Repent and become a new soul confessing your sins to HIM alone and coming to the TRUTH and having a testimony to show all the world the Change GOD can do in you to make you new and forgiven. You will finally be able to show all the world and expose the corruption because Christ JESUS in You will be more worth than anything this decaying sinful earth that is passing away has. Praise GOD when that happens. I hope and pray it does.
RW
"Who killed the electric car?"
In the late 1990s, General Motors sold an electric car that traveled 300 miles on a charge, could be fully charged in an hour, and could be operated for the equivalent of 60 cents per gallon.
No oil filters, no oil changes, no emissions, no trips to the gas station.
So what did they do?
When it became apparent the marketplace actually wanted these cars, it rounded then all up and destroyed them.
Not a conspiracy theory. This is what actually happened.
See the complete catalog of
free Brasscheck TV videos AT http://www.brasschecktv.com
Why GM, Ford, Chrysler etc is broke and asking for handouts as they flew in their Private jets when they panhandled the Govt. for a stimulus package to continue to play their special interest games.
When it became apparent the marketplace actually wanted these cars, it rounded them all up and destroyed them.
Not a conspiracy theory. This is what actually happened.
God said "Vengeance is mine alone". So sad for those who continue on sinning against HIM.
I seen and heard about this years back and I wonder if possibly this is old news but was glad it resurfaced and was on YOUTUBE still and not removed by special interest or whomever does not want the American people to know about this. Isn't it just wonderful they really think that most Americans are stupid and they can get away with whatever because their money hides them from wrongdoing? NOT! I still like GAS POWERED Vehicles particularly muscle cars and 4x4's of old and the old 92 beast God gave me for next to nothing that runs exceptional still does me just fine I have no complaints. There is nothing like a "Killer ride dude" that muscles its way down the highway sounding like 1000 horses (oaoaoaoaoaoao grunting like Tim the tool man Taylor).
But finally they came up with an electric car that actually ran for 300 miles and I just bet they were coming up with a alternator that would continue a charge to where eventually it would run across the States and back on a charge. That is 6000 round trip if I am not over exaggerating to which I probably am. But just Imagine a car always able to go until it finally quits and you get a lot of miles and years out of it with barley any problems in the long run. I heard they were almost there until some greedy fiends pulled the plug and destroyed every electric car because we cannot have people actually out of their control can we? It takes me back to the old Dodge Dart slant 6 motor. Wow what an engine this was. I had one once, a 1964 push button transmission automatic 4 door that I believe was at least 30 miles or more a gallon if I remember right or I could be wrong but it did get allot mileage between fuel ups by far and this was a very tough engine. But Chrysler scratchedWhen it became apparent the marketplace actually wanted these cars, it rounded then all up and destroyed them.
Not a conspiracy theory. This is what actually happened. that winning model becuase that engine just was the engine that always could and was an engine that was like the energizer bunny still going and going etc. etc. You can still see a Dodge Dart, Plymouth Valiant, etc Slant 6 engine form the early 60's still just hauling away because they could not destroy all them like they did the electric cars. Did you remember the electric car that went a top speed of 200 or more or so on the Salt flats? And do you remember the electric cars sold in LA was going to be the Standard push for all residence back then to have one? Why cannot people have the option to have a gas guzzler or an electric car in the free market to compete? And who to really say what the people want and demand? You cannot base a market place on assumptions like gambling to which that is what 90% of our financial institutions are based on. Gambling and borrowing against PAPER. Yes people, paper money that is not worth anything but the same as toilet paper runs this whole madness. Gold coins, silver coins, bronze coins, or rocks used to run the show or how much cattle and crops you has was truly worth something. It is no wonder we are having a crash. GOD owns everything and this well is another warning judgment of GOD's common grace to mankind who continue to ignore HIM willfully and worship the creator rather than their Creator.
Just to say to the Hoards who are responsible, Do worry to hard or should I say worry so much because you will be caught eventually. It just depends how long GOD allows your season of treachery to last and when it is finished, just remember GOD is Sovereign and HIS judgment will be worse for you and everything you hold onto that is your idol called mammon. But in the meantime keep sweating you Corporate and Shadow Government hoards because your time of sin is over really soon. GOD must punish sinners who reject HIS righteous ways and will bring the final JUSTICE. IT is never to late too Repent and become a new soul confessing your sins to HIM alone and coming to the TRUTH and having a testimony to show all the world the Change GOD can do in you to make you new and forgiven. You will finally be able to show all the world and expose the corruption because Christ JESUS in You will be more worth than anything this decaying sinful earth that is passing away has. Praise GOD when that happens. I hope and pray it does.
RW
"Who killed the electric car?"
In the late 1990s, General Motors sold an electric car that traveled 300 miles on a charge, could be fully charged in an hour, and could be operated for the equivalent of 60 cents per gallon.
No oil filters, no oil changes, no emissions, no trips to the gas station.
So what did they do?
When it became apparent the marketplace actually wanted these cars, it rounded then all up and destroyed them.
Not a conspiracy theory. This is what actually happened.
See the complete catalog of
free Brasscheck TV videos AT http://www.brasschecktv.com
Why GM, Ford, Chrysler etc is broke and asking for handouts as they flew in their Private jets when they panhandled the Govt. for a stimulus package to continue to play their special interest games.
When it became apparent the marketplace actually wanted these cars, it rounded them all up and destroyed them.
Not a conspiracy theory. This is what actually happened.
God said "Vengeance is mine alone". So sad for those who continue on sinning against HIM.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
FORCED ABORTIONS COMING TO AMERICA AND YES THE US TAX PAYER WILL PAY FOR THESE SICK ACTS OF SELFISHNESS.
MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH
How utterly awful and sickening that abortion still exists in the world and now they want this atrocious sinful act of selfishness to be forced? How can this be in America?
How is this a right and part of the BILL OF RIGHTS and our Constitution. How come our Government cannot explain to WE THE PEOPLE to actually where in the the Constitution does it allow Abortion to be a RIGHT? IT does not no where. This sinful act is allowed because it is supported by an already condemned people who are but a chaff to which the wind will quickly blow away very soon. GOD is and will bring judgment very soon.
For Vengeance is HIS.
RW
Planned Parenthood: Force doctors to do abortions
Law firms gear up to defend right of conscience
Posted: January 23, 2009
12:25 am Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Experts for the Alliance Defense Fund and Christian Legal Society are gearing up to defend three laws that allow medical professionals to follow their conscience and not participate in abortions.
"Medical professionals should not be forced to perform abortions against their conscience," said Casey Mattox, litigation counsel with the CLS's Center for Law & Religious Freedom.
"Planned Parenthood, the ACLU and their pro-abortion allies are seeking to punish pro-life medical professionals for their beliefs," Mattox said. "Far from arguing for 'choice,' these lawsuits seek to compel health care workers to perform abortions or face dire consequences."
The public-interest legal groups have filed motions to intervene in three separate lawsuits that seek to invalidate a federal law protecting medical professionals from discrimination because they refuse to participate in abortions.
(Story continues below)
Click Here
Three pro-life medical associations are seeking to defend the law against challenges by some state officials, Planned Parenthood, and the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union.
The actions came as the 2009 March for Life was taking place in Washington, when several hundred thousand people gathered to seek protections for the unborn, including the overturning of the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Roe vs. Wade that struck down abortion limits in states.
"For over three decades, federal law has prohibited recipients of federal grants from forcing medical professionals to participate in abortions," said ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. "The arguments in the lawsuits themselves demonstrate lack of compliance with these laws and the necessity of the regulation they are challenging."
Attorney Andrew Knott is assisting as local counsel in the latest dispute in Connecticut.
The Christian Medical Association, Catholic Medical Association, and American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, represented by CLS and ADF attorneys, are asking to be allowed to defend the law, 45 CFR Part 88, enacted in December by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Noting a pattern of grant recipients unaware of or flouting existing laws protecting medical professionals' rights of conscience, HHS enacted the new law to require grantees to certify compliance in order to receive funds. The three long-standing statutes are the Church Amendment, the Coats-Snowe Amendment and the Weldon Amendment.
The three pro-life medical groups point out that denying rights of conscience could harm access to healthcare for all by forcing medical professionals who refuse to perform abortions to either relocate from jurisdictions that force them to do so or leave the profession altogether.
Today President Obama, who as a state lawmaker in Illinois objected to requiring doctors to provide medical care for infants who survive abortions, affirmed his support for virtually unlimited abortion on demand.
Obama was issued a challenge by March for Life officials, who had invited him to address their annual march and rally.
The organization challenged Obama to "watch the evil deed of a surgical abortion to know what it looks like to pull off the head, arms and legs of a preborn human."
The organization noted, "There is a commercial killing site within a few blocks of the White House."
"Ten Pin Strike against Political Freedom"
[Commentary.]
Everybody wants to control something so they can have the most toys and the most power at the same time. So they create a monopoly, pay off a few politicians and higher ups and they get there way. Money and mammon supersedes over every other free borne human and their lively hood including the Powerful to lesson the weak and the poor their freedom. It is funny and amusing that PAPER money and more of it you have in the numbers electronically and the more paper they continue to create continues to be the nonsense that continues to dumbdown society. Tell when when if many workers who do the REAL WORK for all nations so you and I could live better really stopped doing what they do? I know this will really never happen but my question when if it did. Nothing will ever work like electronics, food supply, transportation, etc etc. and we would be a critical mass if this ever happen. The environmentalist's love this idea I think. Well do you think the rich and the powerful really expect the true workers to allow them to continue to control everything even the internet? Do you think WE THE PEOPLE truly will allow our Speech anywhere to be controlled completely? If we do then we are in for it.
RW
Move to End "Internet Neutrality": Blow to Bloggers. "Ten Pin Strike against Political Freedom"
by Sherwood Ross Global Research, January 26, 2009
If the cable and phone companies that transmit Internet data are allowed to charge higher rates to some producers for faster service the result will be “a ten pin strike against political freedom,” a prominent legal authority warns.
That’s because the change will enable the wealthy to “quickly take over the high speed transmissions (for their trash commercial content) just as they completely monopolize radio and TV, and just as their incredibly greedy profit-seeking has had a very deleterious effect on print journalism,” writes Lawrence Velvel, dean of the Massachusetts School of Law at Andover.
Velvel’s plea for “internet neutrality” comes in his new book “An Enemy of The People,” subtitled “The Unending Battle Against Conventional Wisdom(Doukathsan).” Essentially, he writes, the proposed change is an “attempt by the wealthy to make the internet into yet another repository of their power…”
Under the new scheme sought by transmission firms, Velvel writes, “large companies would pay more, no doubt a lot more, in order to have their messages, videos, audios, and any other content transmitted rapidly. The rest of us peasants, who could not afford to have our content move fast, would pay less and have it move more slowly.”
“One can be sure that the average guy with something he wants to say will be relegated to lower speed transmissions,” Velvel writes. “Blogdom, and the use of the internet by average people for political purposes, will likely be as good as dead.”
According to Save The Internet.com(STI), “The nation’s largest telephone and cable companies ---including AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner---want to be Internet gatekeepers, deciding which Web sites go fast or slow and which won’t load at all.”
“What we have here,” Velvel explained, “is a bunch of unregenerate capitalists, who think that nothing else is important except trying to make as much as they can conceivably get away with. As with the oil companies and the investments banks, huge profit margins and scores of millions annually for their chairmen and CEOs isn’t enough for them. They want more. Always more. Nothing else matters to them. The pipes (transmission) companies are no different.”
Velvel pointed out, “The average guy can’t be published in a newspaper, and cannot afford the money to pay to be on radio or television. His voice is limited. The great benefit of the internet, the reason it bade fair to be the new version of the poor man’s printing press (which is what picketing and marching were once called), is that it gave everyone a chance to have his or her say in a way that was immediately available to anyone who found it or knew of it and wanted to read it.”
“That is why tens of millions of blogs sprang up,” Velvel continued, “with (at least) many thousands of them being on political subjects, and with blogdom sometimes having major political impacts.”
Others besides Velvel have also commented on efforts to destroy net neutrality. As a consequence of a 2005 decision by the Bush Federal Communications Commission, Internet Neutrality, “the foundation of the free and open internet---was put in jeopardy,” STI says. “Now cable and phone company lobbyists are pushing to block legislation that would reinstate Net Neutrality.”
“Without Net Neutrality, startups and entrepreneurs will be muscled out of the marketplace by big corporations that pay for a top spot on the Web,” STI says.
“If Congress turns the Internet over to the telephone and cable giants, everyone who uses the Internet will be affected,” STI continues. “Connecting to your office could take longer if you don’t purchase your carrier’s preferred applications. Sending family photos and videos could slow to a crawl. Web pages you always use for online banking, access to health care information, planning a trip, or communicating with friends and family could fall victim to pay-for-speed schemes.”
STI warned the consequences of abandoning Internet Neutrality would be “devastating.” “Innovation would be stifled, competition limited, and access to information restricted. Choice and the free market would be sacrificed to the interests of a few corporate executives.”
For interviews with Dean Velvel, contact Sherwood Ross at sherwoodr1@yahoo.com. Email Dean Velvel at velvel@mslaw.edu
Sherwood Ross is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by Sherwood Ross
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Expose the fradulence but not out of spite.
Let me put it to you all straight so no one really gets the wrong idea or have a stumbling blocked assumption to my many brash commentaries of our President or any other immoral matters based on facts and not mere opinions that I consistently and sometimes negatively report which is not really easy for me because I would rather always like to talk about the good things if this was reality alone. But it isn't. Immorality is spreading like an epidemic and the cure is JESUS. And I am motivated by earnestness to continue to be used by the Spirit of CHRIST JESUS and want so many to be saved from what we deserve and it is coming to those who remain dead in their sins. OH such an awful terror to fall into the hands of an angry GOD who will punish the well deserved and HE must punish sin if HE is a RIGHTEOUS GOD and slay the wicked when HE comes the second time like LION roaring swift with HIS terrible swift sword. If it is brash reports such as what I have been writing lately that wakes many up and rubs them the wrong way then so be it until the LORD directs my attention to something else or another approach. But I must tell it like it is.
In the case and many articles against OBAMA, I actually like the character of Obama and his smoothness of personality. Obama definitely has a cult of personality and charisma, how could you not like how his personality and character is. He seems he would be a wonderful friend doesn't he if you knew him personally. How he he gives speeches, addresses the media, and speaks in all respectable matter to everyone as a role model should be and this is actually what America needs actually from all those that run for such powerful office. If it is personality and character that is a test to win WE THE PEOPLE well Obama passed with flying colors as we all know. Even if he is one of the lessor of two evils (no pun intended) so to speak he is very likable and deserves to be prayed for continuously correct? We need to pray for his and his families soul regardless of the outcome of negitivity if there ever is one. The many articles I read questioning his citizenship and his eligibility to be President, which is very serious indeed and should never be allowed to be covered up at all costs, we should never gnash our teeth at him or curse him in such ways like the wicked do always against the righteous. We Christians who truly trust in Christ alone and know Christ alone is the only SOVEREIGN and in control, are of a higher mentality as well and we truly need to examine ourselves to see if we are. YES, we are of a higher standard in which I many times forget (laughs) and many who are still in bondage to immorality cannot stand our high given mentality because we are forgiven and they are ignorantly condemned already and we should never give them or allow them to witness such Pharisee-isms . We are Christ example if we follow HIM correct? Get it? FOLLOW HIM? As the Apostle and Saint Paul put it clearly;
Colossians 3:2
And set your minds and keep them set on what is above (the higher things), not on the things that are on the earth.
AND
Colossians 3:15
And let the peace (soul harmony which comes) from Christ rule (act as umpire continually) in your hearts [deciding and settling with finality all questions that arise in your minds, in that peaceful state] to which as [members of Christ's] one body you were also called [to live]. And be thankful (appreciative), [giving praise to God always].
Even in the situations I report against all immorality from the weakest to the strongest forms of it, I still must learn to be as graceful as the LORD is to US who were so justified by what our LORD Christ JESUS did on the cross, His resurrection, and HIS ascension for all of US who are called according to HIS purpose.
And if it seems that I have failed at this, well forgive me and I will fail sometimes because original sin still battles within me and praise GOD in Christ JESUS HE knows this and is ever at work in US, preparing for the perfection in US to come all to GOD's Glory alone, Amen? But sometimes we fall short and daily.
So I just wanted again to clear up the waves I make and make known that it is all in warning motivated by the LOVE that is within me and this LOVE offers to anyone who will have HIM. For HE does call all to repentance if they will come but HE also says few that find it. Are you one of them that desires above all things to be that few? I surely do. Nothing compares to greatness of knowing JESUS CHRIST, THE SOVEREIGN KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS who alone does satisfy US alone if we not harden our hearts.
RICHARD WHITE JAN 27 2009
Government Actions portrays that Children are the enemy especially the unborn that is the problem of the economy?
COMMENTARY. Immoral reasoning the dumbing down of humanity.
We all know that our American Government today is mostly ran by immoral-ites, owned by special interest wealthy agenda-ites who have no care for the US Constitution or have any respect for our 200 year old system and the Fore Fathers that help bring this into effect blessed by GOD. I continue to blow the same Trumpet continuously possibly annoying most of you with the same old stories, but it is the same old story. Tell what is new? What will really change? Corruption and self interest in Government will never change while sin still owns the world technically. And self absorb behavior will continue to allow sin to lead many down that WIDE road that only leads to destruction. I ask when will we truly have a Moral society again if that can be possible before Christ comes back. Some Christian re constructionist believe this is a possibility through prayer and action. Some others in the faith just give up because they are taught a systematic pessimistic eschatology or think they will be raptured and really just go on with their lives until that happens, and many are just comfortable thinking GOD blessings of God gien materialism will not waver for them in this crises because they are "living their best life now" why would GOD subject me to wrath or tribulation when HE loves me and says we are not subject to HIS wrath or judgments as they take Scripture way out of context to justify their cares for the world. Take a place for a Majority Leader and leaders who claim Christianity but act against morality at all cost to keep themselves as lifers in office so they can get paid all the days of their indulgent lives. Especially blaming now that Children are the problem of all these drains of economy and that contraception and abortion is a final solution for our economy? But hey what do we really expect from a sinful world? I do believe as the example of the book of Jonah and his sign it is still possible to CHANGE with prayer and action, but then again will the Church ever act? Again Judgment starts in the house of GOD first.
RW Jan 2008
Pelosi: Fewer babies = stronger economy
Charlie Butts and Jody Brown - OneNewsNow - 1/27/2009 6:00:00 AMBookmark and Share
Updated 8:45 a.m. Central
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi stirred up a hornet's nest by promoting the idea of spending of millions of dollars on birth control and abortion as part of the economic stimulus package.
"Contraception," argued Pelosi, "will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government." Her comments came on ABC's This Week when asked by host George Stephanopoulos how expanding "family-planning services" to the tune of millions of dollars will stimulate the economy. OneNewsNow sought reaction from Susan Fani, director of communications for the Catholic League.
"It's quite shocking, actually, that the Speaker of the House -- who claims to be Catholic -- would go on national television and claim that contraception would reduce the cost to the government," exclaims Fani. "It's just beyond words, really."
Pelosi has five children and six grandchildren. Catholic League president Bill Donohue finds her comments revealing. "We have reached a new low when high-ranking public office holders in the federal government cast children as the enemy," he offers in a press statement. "But at least it explains their enthusiasm for abortion-on-demand."
Will the spending on "family-planning services" help dig America out of its economic doldrums?
"That's not going to help grow the economy," Fani responds. "It doesn't even make sense as a prospect for helping this country through our economic crisis. So it's wrong on so many different levels, and just shows...a very flawed thought process."
American Life League calls Pelosi's remarks "a betrayal" of her Catholic faith, and the Christian Defense Coalition says it is "unthinkable" that she would try to stimulate the economy by "seeking to reduce the number of children."
America needs to produce 2.1 children per couple to keep up with births to support the population -- and that rate is not being maintained. Economies in Europe have been especially hurt by a drop in birth rates.
"Pelosi should abstain from social engineering"
Ron Paul's Approach to Reversing Roe v. Wade
Proverbs 6:16-19
16These six things the Lord hates, indeed, seven are an abomination to Him:
17A proud look [the spirit that makes one overestimate himself and underestimate others], a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,(D)
18A heart that manufactures wicked thoughts and plans, feet that are swift in running to evil,
19A false witness who breathes out lies [even under oath], and he who sows discord among his brethren.
COMMENTARY. And here we still are since 1973 proving that the legalization of murder and a death sentence in the first degree to humans not out of the womb yet is still one of the worst selfish blows to America this country has ever witness outside of illegalizing prayer in the Schools and the TRUTH etc etc in 1961. Ever since stupid Americans elected immoral persons in office since the 50's because of how these CASE LAW inventors established and ruined actual JUSTICE in this country because of how CASE LAW which is truly UN_American practice if you actually study the law books since Professor Christopher Columbus Langdell was bent on ruining the Courts system to have his evolution fairy tail the norm and to have all morality ethic removed so self indulgence can be without guilt which will never happen to any human truly. Humans are condemned already if they do not trust in the SON and live their SELFish lives against HIM. So we have the worst holocaust ever in front of US daily and we wonder why we are in economic crises, and why Obama was elected and remains silent of his natural origin and he is President and possibly an illegal one at that. END ABORTION becuase GOD HATES the shedding of innocent blood remember. It is one of the 7 things HE hates.
Ron Paul's Approach to Reversing Roe v. Wade
Written by Warren Mass
Friday, 23 January 2009 15:38
Yesterday, January 22, saw a veritable army of pro-lifers participate in the 35th annual March for Life in Washington, D.C. This demonstration of public sentiment was first held in 1974 to mark the first anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision. In that decision, of course, the Supreme Court ruled that all state laws prohibiting abortion were unconstitutional. Since then, an estimated 50,000,000 babies have been killed in the womb in the United States.
As we observed yesterday, ever since the Roe v. Wade (and the less publicized Doe v. Bolton) decision, the primary strategy among pro-life people has been to overturn Roe by electing so-called pro-life Republican presidents who will appoint strict constructionist justices to the Supreme Court. Theoretically, this strategy will eventually lead to the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
This writer and his wife have been active in the pro-life movement for decades. Between us, we have participated in life rallies, life marches, life chains, and prayer outside abortion mills in states as widespread as Massachusetts, California, Texas, Wisconsin, and Florida. This year, we donated money to help send a group of 60 students from Ave Maria University in Florida to the March for Life in Washington. Needless to say, we have great admiration for the many thousands of people who marched down Constitution Avenue yesterday, and for Nellie Gray, who has organized this event from its inception. However, at yesterday’s rally, Gray told those gathered that the battle for life had to be won at the federal level, that it was not enough to send the issue back to the states, where abortion could be legal in one state and illegal in the next.
Of course, that strategy overlooks the fact that abortion, like other crimes, was criminalized on the state level prior to Roe v. Wade. In fact, it was Roe v. Wade that interjected the federal government into the abortion issue in the first place and at the same time made abortion on demand legal throughout the United States. Since the federal "solution" to the abortion issue has resulted in a holocaust of 50 million preborn babies since 1973, why should a return to the pre-1973 approach of prohibiting abortion on the state level be rejected now in favor of another federal "solution"?
Transferring powers from the states to the federal government does not automatically mean that the laws would be better or that they would be applied as originally intended. (Such transfers of power can be a very dangerous thing and can have unintended consequences, since they result in a consolidation of power as well as more distance between the governed and government.) This is true even when the intent behind giving more power to the federal government is to end injustice, as was the case with the language in the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that was intended to extend civil rights to freed slaves after the Civil War. Despite the intent, it was this same 14th Amendment that eventually provided the Supreme Court with its convoluted justification for writing Roe v. Wade. The 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868, provided: “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” (Emphasis added.)
Prior to the adoption of the 14th Amendment, it was the responsibility of each state to provide its citizens with equal protection of the laws. However, a series of court rulings eventually culminated in using the 14th Amendment as a pretext to make the states’ business the federal government’s business. Following this precedent, the Supreme Court that wrote Roe v. Wade first completely ignored the literal meaning of the 14th Amendment, which, (quite ironically) states that “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” (Emphasis added.) The court then reaffirmed a right to privacy unknown to the authors of the Constitution and found only in the “penumbra” of the Constitution (which had been cited in previous “privacy” decisions, most notably, in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965) and — following the precedent of previous courts — included the “right” to abortion in this newly invented right.
It is a case of reaping what we sow. By transferring the authority to oversee equal protection of the laws from the states to the federal government (particularly the federal courts), we have inadvertently also given the federal courts the converse power to abolish those rights! In this case, the most fundamental right of all — the right to life!
Fortunately, there exists a simpler, more practical strategy to protect life (and other things we cherish), provided for in Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. This section allows Congress to strip the Supreme Court of any cases (e.g., abortion cases) where the Supreme Court does not possess original jurisdiciton. Congress can also limit the jurisdication of any lower federal courts, since Congress created those courts. Congress could make Roe v. Wade a nonproblem overnight, since by prohibiting the federal courts from hearing abortion cases the states could then put back in place anti-abortion laws.
This remedy has already been introduced by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) in the new (111th) Congress as H.R. 539, the “We the People Act.” H.R. 539 would remove the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and other federal courts from cases related to the free exercise or establishment of religion; the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction (e.g., abortion); the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation (same-sex marriage).
The legislation would also prohibit the federal courts from relying on any judicial decision involving any issue referred to in the above list. In other words, it would remove Roe v. Wade and similar decisions from judicial precedent.
In 2003, Rep. Paul (an obstetrician who has delivered over 4,000 children) wrote an essay entitled “Pro-Life Action Must Originate from Principle.” We encourage you to follow the link and read the entire essay, but here are a few of its key points:
• "Those who cherish unborn life have become frustrated by our inability to overturn or significantly curtail Roe v. Wade. Because of this, attempts were made to fight against abortion using political convenience rather than principle."
• "When we surrender constitutional principles, we do untold damage to the moral underpinnings on which our Constitution and entire system of government rest. Those underpinnings are the inalienable right to life, liberty, and property."
• "Pro-lifers should be fiercely loyal to this system of federalism, because the very same Constitution that created the federal system also asserts the inalienable right to life."
• "Pro-life forces have worked for the passage of bills that disregard the federal system…. Each of these bills rested on specious constitutional grounds and undermined the federalism our Founders recognized and intended as the greatest protection of our most precious rights."
• "Each of these bills transfers to the federal government powers constitutionally retained by the states, thus upsetting the separation and balance of powers that federalism was designed to guarantee. To undermine federalism is to indirectly surrender the very principle upon which the protection of our inalienable right to life depends."
Following the March for Life, marches were encouraged to visit their congressional representatives to lobby for the right to life. As to how many of these marchers knew about H.R. 539, or encouraged their representative to cosponsor it, we have no way of knowing. But we suspect most missed the boat on what may be the only way to reverse the scourge of Roe v. Wade in most of our lifetimes.
However, each marcher (and each supporter who watched from home) still has the opportunity to contact his representative by e-mail, phone, fax, or an old-fashioned letter.
The fight for life must continue!
Friday, January 23, 2009
Lawyer challenging eligibility raises issue of secret conference??? HERE WE GO AGAIN.
Natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
More of this SOAP OPERA as it continues. OBAMA JUST PROVIDE PROOF OF NATURAL BORN CITIZENSHIP JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER CITIZEN IN AMERICA HAS TO FOR THE SAME REASONS AND END THIS SOAP OPERA ONCE AND FOR ALL IF IT IS NOT TRUE AND YOU ARE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. WHAT PART OF THAT QUESTION AND ANSWER DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND AND YOU SAID YOU WOULD BE TRANSPARENT?
WELL SO FAR EVEN AFTER ONE DAY IN OFFICE YOU HAVE PROVED OTHERWISE. AGAIN SAME OLD POLITICS OF US CONSTITUTION DESTROYING, DIFFERENT LIAR.
OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
President's meeting with judges questioned
Lawyer challenging eligibility raises issue of secret conference
Posted: January 23, 2009
12:25 am Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
A lawyer who is working on one of the cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that challenges the eligibility of President Barack Obama to occupy the Oval Office is raising concerns over a meeting between the defendant in the case and the judges who are expected to review it.
The case is one of many brought before U.S. courts that allege Obama doesn't meet the "natural born" requirement of the U.S. Constitution for the president. It's one of about half a dozen that have reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which already has declined to grant hearings to several cases.
Orly Taitz, whose case is scheduled to be heard tomorrow in a conference among justices, a private meeting at which they review cases and decide whether they should hold a hearing, confirmed on her website today that a supplemental brief in her arguments had been distributed.
But the website also reported she "had to explain … many of us citizens are also concerned about the eight out of nine justices meeting privately with Mr. Obama (while the cases are pending)."
(Story continues below)
Click Here
The blog continued, "No reporters were allowed. No attorneys were invited on behalf of the plaintiffs. This causes many of us citizens to question the rules of judicial ethics and causes us to question the impartiality on behalf of the justices."
The report said "quite a number of people" have raised their questions with their U.S. representatives over the issues.
According to a CBS report, Obama visited the Supreme Court before his inauguration at the invitation of Chief Justice John Roberts. The report described it as a protocol visit.
According to a separate published report, Obama and then-Vice President-elect Joe Biden met in a court conference room with Roberts and seven other justices for about 45 minutes.
The report said the only absent justice was Samuel Alito.
Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 215,000 others and sign the petition demanding proof of eligibility now!
The supplemental documents
in the Taitz case cite an executive order concerning qualifications issued by President George Bush on Jan. 16.
"This action is seeking the mandate for the U.S. State Department, the FBI and the Director of the Personnel Department to seek the documents for verifying Obama's legitimacy as president and also his citizenship of the United States," the blog reported.
The Supreme Court document reveals that the Taitz case is scheduled for conference tomorrow, and her supplemental briefs have been distributed to the justices.
Taitz said her arguments rest on precedents from both the California Supreme Court, which years ago removed a candidate for president from the ballot because he was only 34, and the U.S. Supreme Court's affirmation of the ruling. The Constitution requires a president to be 35. Her case raises not the issue of age, but Obama's birthplace and citizenship status, which also are specified in the Constitution.
The lawsuits that have been brought allege in various ways Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Some allege his birth took place in Kenya, and his mother was a minor at the time of his birth – too young to confer American citizenship. They argue Obama's father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Kenyan citizen subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time and would have handed down British citizenship.
There also are questions raised about Obama's move to Indonesia when he was a child and his attendance at school there when only Indonesian citizens were allowed and his travel to Pakistan in the '80s when such travel was forbidden to American citizens.
One case, being handled by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, is seeking Obama's school records from Occidental College, which could reveal if Obama, for example, attended class on aid intended for foreign students.
Another lawyer working on similar allegations, Philip J. Berg, has written to Congress seeking an investigation, while Taitz' filings have been before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Berg, whose information is on his ObamaCrimes.com website, said the issue isn't going to disappear.
Others agreed.
"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void," argues a California case brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes, also a presidential candidate. "Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal."
WND twice has organized opportunities for readers to send FedEx letters to the Supreme Court, asking for consideration of the issue on its merits.
The most recent campaign generated 12,096 messages, following the earlier effort that resulted in 60,128 letters.
Obama has claimed in his autobiography and elsewhere that he was born in Hawaii in 1961 to parents Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a Kenyan national, and Stanley Ann Dunham, a minor. But details about which hospital handled the birth and other details provided on the complete birth certificate have been withheld by Obama despite lawsuits and public demands for release.
Meanwhile, a separate report has emerged in the Buffalo, N.Y., News about a woman who said she recalled being told about Obama's birth in Hawaii. Barbara Nelson reported she was having a dinner with Dr. Rodney T. West, an obstetrician, when he discussed the birth of a baby boy to Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama's mother.
She said she later taught Obama as a high school student in Hawaii.
WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi went to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.
The biggest question was why, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn't simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors.
The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?
TELL ME WILL ALL THIS CONTINUOUS CORRUPTION SPARK ANOTHER CIVIL WAR ACTION BASED ON THE 2ND AMENDMENT SO MORALITY AND OUR US CONSTITUTION CAN HAVE ITS RULING PLACE WHERE ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL AGAIN? THIS I HOPE AND PRAY WON'T HAPPEN BUT SOME PEACEFUL PATRIOTIC MUST HAPPEN TO SAVE AMERICA FROM THOSE WITHIN WHO ARE TRYING SO DESPERATELY AND IMMORALLY TO RUIN WHAT OUR FOUNDING FORE FATHERS LOST THEIR LIVES FOR AND I DO NOT JUST MEAN THE POLITICIANS AND STATESMEN, I MEAN THE ACTUAL MEN AND WOMEN WHO GAVE THEIR LIVES SO WE CAN LIVE IN PEACE AND FREEDOM UNDER GOD. SUCH A SAD TIME. MAY CHRIST JESUS THE KING COME QUICKLY AND TAKE OVER HIS KINGDOM COME.
Revelation 21:8
But as for the cowards and the ignoble and the contemptible and the cravenly lacking in courage and the cowardly submissive, and as for the unbelieving and faithless, and as for the depraved and defiled with abominations, and as for murderers and the lewd and adulterous and the practicers of magic arts and the idolaters (those who give supreme devotion to anyone or anything other than God) and all liars (those who knowingly convey untruth by word or deed)--[all of these shall have] their part in the lake that blazes with fire and brimstone. This is the second death
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
More Video evidence: Question about Obama's birth certificate avoided
Luke 12:2
Nothing is [so closely] covered up that it will not be revealed, or hidden that it will not be known.
So again tell me why this isn't Public news and why no answer is given for these accusations to clear up this mess? Come OBAMA tell the truth. What is this whole Presidential madness seemingly like just entertainment? Tell me is our whole American Government just for entertainment? IS IT ENTERTAINMENT TO DISMANTLE THE US CONSTITUTION AND SLAP IT IN THE AMERICAN PUBLICS FACE?
Will the real truth come out. YES it will and HE is coming quickly to judge the wicked and the Righteous. Which side will you be on?
Question about Obama's birth certificate avoided
Nov. 24 Obama Birth Certificate Forgery Smoking Gun Revealed by Dr. Ron Polarik
Unsolved Mystery; Obama's Birth Certificate
Show us your birth certificate, Barack Obama! Are you hiding something?!
Can we just end this dilemma OBAMA? Come out and Prove who you are and shut up this whole mess.
You can see tons more on youtube
So sad.
RW
Nothing is [so closely] covered up that it will not be revealed, or hidden that it will not be known.
So again tell me why this isn't Public news and why no answer is given for these accusations to clear up this mess? Come OBAMA tell the truth. What is this whole Presidential madness seemingly like just entertainment? Tell me is our whole American Government just for entertainment? IS IT ENTERTAINMENT TO DISMANTLE THE US CONSTITUTION AND SLAP IT IN THE AMERICAN PUBLICS FACE?
Will the real truth come out. YES it will and HE is coming quickly to judge the wicked and the Righteous. Which side will you be on?
Question about Obama's birth certificate avoided
Nov. 24 Obama Birth Certificate Forgery Smoking Gun Revealed by Dr. Ron Polarik
Unsolved Mystery; Obama's Birth Certificate
Show us your birth certificate, Barack Obama! Are you hiding something?!
Can we just end this dilemma OBAMA? Come out and Prove who you are and shut up this whole mess.
You can see tons more on youtube
So sad.
RW
Monday, January 19, 2009
Alan Keyes lawsuit warns America may see 'usurper' in Oval Office
I now ask if the country wanted the first Black American President (no pun intended) then why oh why did you not support Alan Keyes when he time and time again ran for President. Was it because Alan Keyes is a Moral American and cannot be bought by any corruption or wickedness from any political party but chooses what political party he should serve because of what he morally stands for? Was it because Alan Keyes upholds the US Constitution and allows it to speak for itself by itself as his record shows?Just look at his resume. Even though I voted for Ron Paul, I still considered Alan Keyes as well but thought negitively because of what I was fed by the poopagandic immoral Media to which I am very sorry to have been fooled by, by not searching the truth out because of my selfish lazyness from my past. Praise GOD woke me up to reality and gives me HIS strength For the America Media these days are not truly Moral Americans supporting save a few. It is no wonder I write like I do. But as for Alan Keyes, If I were you listen to what he says............................
WND Exclusive CHANGING OF THE GUARD
'Constitutional crisis' looming over Obama's birth location
Alan Keyes lawsuit warns America may see 'usurper' in Oval Office
Posted: November 14, 2008
8:40 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Alan Keyes
The California secretary of state should refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until President-elect Barack Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office, alleges a California court petition filed on behalf of former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others.
The legal action today is just the latest is a series of challenges, some of which have gone as high as the U.S. Supreme Court, over the issue of Obama's status as a "natural-born citizen," a requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.
WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.
The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn't ordered it made available to settle the rumors.
The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?
Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born, while a video posted on YouTube features Obama's Kenyan grandmother Sarah claiming to have witnessed Obama's birth in Kenya.
The California action was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Alan Keyes, the presidential candidate of the American Independent Party, along with Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors.
"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal," the action challenges.
California Secretary of State Debra Bowen
The petition is a request for the Superior Court of California in Sacramento County to issue a peremptory writ barring Secretary of State Debra Bowen "from both certifying to the governor the names of the California Electors, and from transmitting to each presidential Elector a Certificate of Election, until such documentary proof is produced and verified showing that Senator Obama is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States and does not hold citizenship of Indonesia, Kenya or Great Britain."
It continues with a request for a writ barring California's electors from signing the Certificate of Vote until documentary proof is produced.
An Obama spokesperson interviewed by WND described such lawsuits as "garbage."
The popular vote Nov. 4 favored Obama over Sen. John McCain by several percentage points. But because of the distribution of the votes, Obama is projected to take the Electoral College vote, when it is held in December, by a 2-to-1 margin.
Named as defendants in the action are Bowen, Obama, vice president elect Joe Biden and the long list of California party electors.
Citing the constitutional requirement that a president be a "natural born" citizen, the case discusses other state and federal court cases regarding "aspects of lost or dual citizenship concerning Senator Obama. Those challenges, in and of themselves, demonstrate Petitioners' argument that reasonable doubt exists as to the eligibility of the Democratic Party’s nominee for President," the case said.
Get Brad O'Leary's blockbuster book detailing the agenda for the upcoming Obama White House, "The Audacity of Deceit."
"There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process," the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.
"Since [the Secretary of State] has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States of America is received by her," the document said.
"This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office.
"To this date, in this regard, SOS has not carried out that fundamental duty."
The case said a simple attestation from the candidate or his party isn't sufficient.
"Historically, California Secretaries of State have exercised their due diligence by reviewing necessary background documents, verifying that the candidates that were submitted by the respective political parties as eligible for the ballot were indeed eligible. In 1968, the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for President of the United States. The then SOS, Mr. Frank Jordan, found that, according to Mr. Cleaver's birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the 35 years of age needed to be on the ballot as a candidate for President. Using his administrative powers, Mr. Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Mr. Cleaver unsuccessfully challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of the State of California, and, later, to the Supreme Court of the United States."
Similarly, in 1984, the Peace and Freedom Party candidate Larry Holmes was removed from the ballot.
The "certificate of live birth" posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges.
"Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence," the document said. "The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama's original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him."
The case also raises the circumstances of Obama's time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama's mother having given up his U.S. citizenship.
Any subsequent U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be "naturalized," not "natural-born."
"Based on all of the above, it is the duty of the SOS to obtain proper documentation of Senator Obama's citizenship to confirm his eligibility for the office or the President of the United States," the case said.
Just this week, WND has reported on more than half a dozen other legal challenges have been filed in federal and state courts demanding Obama's decertification from ballots or seeking to halt elector meetings, claiming he has failed to prove his U.S. citizenship status.
Among the states where cases are being tracked are Ohio, Connecticut, Washington, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Hawaii, and there were reports of other cases being developed in Utah, Wyoming, Florida, New York, North Carolina, Texas, California and Virginia.
“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.” – George Washington
IS OBAMA A NATURAL CITIZEN BEING SWORN IN OR NOT????? IF THIS INFORMATION IS TRUE THEN THE US IS IN DANGER OF LOSING OUR CONSTITUTION WAKE UP!
Does the US CONSTITUTION matter anymore IN OUR NATION? What in the world is truly going on and why is this such news never being reported on? WAKE UP STUPID AMERICAN your freedom is being stripped because this is an all out attack on our VERY AMERICAN foundation. DO YOU CARE? IF THIS INFORMATION IS TRUE THEN YOU BETTER WAKE UP AND PREPARE AMERICAN.
READ ON IF YOU CARE.
The United States Constitution Requires
that our President be a natural born
citizen of the United States ( http://www.obamacrimes.com/)
12/09/08 - My brother, Norman Barry Berg, just passed away. My brother meant so much to me, I gave the attached Eulogy in loving memory of him at his funeral. I go forth in my efforts to find the truth of Obama in memory of my brother.
01/15/2009: PRESS RELEASE -Berg is ‘outraged’ at Congress as they failed the citizens of the United States by ‘not’ challenging Obama during the Electoral Vote on January 8, 2009 and Demands that Congressional Hearings be held regarding the ‘qualifications’ of Obama as we are headed for a ‘Constitutional Crisis’ by having an ‘ineligible’ President
01/19/09: PRESS RELEASE - Berg sends 2nd letter to Oprah, stressing that she is one that can have Obama withdraw his name to avoid damage to racial relations in the U.S. for years to come because when the truth comes out that Obama does “not” meet the “qualifications” for President as Obama is “not” “natural born” we are headed for a ‘Constitutional Crisis’ by having an ‘ineligible’ President
WND Exclusive
Eligibility battle rages on 3 fronts
Court, Congress and college challenged on constitutionality
Posted: January 18, 2009
12:05 am Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Officials at Occidental College in Los Angeles have been served with a demand to produce records of Barack Obama's attendance there during the 1980s to determine whether he was registered as a foreign national.
The case is one of three fronts now established that contest the president-elect's constitutional eligibility for the Oval Office.
The Supreme Court and Congress also are being challenged to address concerns that Obama doesn't meet the requirements of the U.S. Constitution that the president be a "natural born" citizen.
WND has reported on a long list of legal cases raising questions over the issue, including several that have reached the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices have declined to give any of the cases full hearings on their merits, but another conference remains on the Supreme Court docket for Jan. 23 on the issue.
"If Obama is sworn in as president, we will file a Petition for Writ of 'Quo Warranto,' a case that will challenge Obama as being ineligible to serve as president because he is 'not qualified,'" said Philip J. Berg, a lawyer who has brought several cases to court.
Berg, whose information is on his ObamaCrimes.com website, indicated the issue isn't going away.
Orly Taitz, a California lawyer
whose dispute remains pending before the high court, agreed, noting that one of the hearings already is scheduled for the days following Obama's inaugural Tuesday.
Taitz said her arguments rest on precedents from both the California Supreme Court, which years ago removed a candidate for president from the ballot because he was only 34, and the U.S. Supreme Court's affirmation of the ruling. The Constitution requires a president to be 35.
In one of the latest developments, Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation petitioned Occidental College with a demand for its records concerning Obama.
"The gravamen of the petition is the question as to whether United States Senator Barack Hussein Obama, of Illinois, is eligible to serve as president of the United States pursuant to the requirements for that office in the United States Constitution," he wrote. "The records sought may provide documentary evidence, and/or admissions by said defendant, as to said eligibility or lack thereof."
Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 200,000 others and sign the petition demanding proof of eligibility now!
College officials confirmed they received the notice but had not decided how to respond. The decision, however, may be removed from their hands because of the team of lawyers Obama has engaged to prevent such inquiries into his past.
"Senator Obama has filed responsive pleadings in this matter and is represented by counsel, and has the opportunity to object to this production, should he so desire," the affidavit from Kreep said.
"Good cause exists for this production under Subpoena Duces Tecum, in that testimony will be elicited from the original records obtained through the witness named herein, and there is no other process available to secure said testimony," he wrote.
The lawsuits allege in various ways Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Some allege his birth took place in Kenya, and his mother was a minor at the time of his birth – too young to confer American citizenship. They argue Obama's father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Kenyan citizen subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time and would have handed down British citizenship.
There also are questions raised about Obama's move to Indonesia when he was a child and his attendance at school there when only Indonesian citizens were allowed and his travel to Pakistan in the '80s when such travel was forbidden to American citizens.
The lawsuit on which USJF is working was filed on behalf of presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others, and describes the potential damage an ineligible president could create.
"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void," argues a case brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes, also a presidential candidate. "Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal."
On his ObamaCrimes.com website, Berg sent his message directly to the U.S. Congress.
He's asking in an open letter to members of Congress for congressional hearings "to determine the truth regarding qualifications of Barry Soetoro, otherwise known as Barack Hussein Obama…"
"As you must be aware, there are many unresolved questions concerning Soetoro/Obama's status or lack thereof, as a 'natural born' American citizen, as required by 'our' U.S. Constitution," he wrote.
He noted the failure by Congress to challenge Obama's eligibility during the process through which the Electoral College vote was adopted.
"Because of your failure to 'question' the eligibility of Soetoro/Obama, we are headed for a 'Constitutional Crisis.' Yes, a 'Constitutional Crisis' because Soetoro/Obama who appears not to be a 'natural born' U.S. citizen is 'ineligible' under 'our' U.S. Constitution to serve as president," he said.
He cited the document published on the Internet by Obama's campaign, the "Certification of Live Birth," as no more than an effort to "quash" questions. Other critics have noted the state of Hawaii granted such certifications to parents of children not born in the state at the time.
"Without truthful information concerning Soetoro/Obama's eligibility to serve as President, 'We the People' have been injured," he wrote.
Taitz took a different route, submitting to the U.S. Supreme Court a motion "to declare that by default, the president elect respondent Barack Obama has failed to qualify under [the] U.S. Constitution."
"Does the burden of proof lie with the petitioner to prove standing and evidence lack of qualification by a candidate/president elect, where election officers rely on a candidate's declaration? OR does the [Constitution] place the burden of proof on the president-elect to provide objective government certified witnessed proofs, with election officers under oath to challenge, examine and declare that the president elect has or has not qualified, enforceable by petition for redress of grievances?"
Not only has the respondent, Obama, "failed to submit proofs … for any of the qualifications," she wrote. "Respondent has hindered discovery."
She argued that having Obama declared ineligible until he would provide documentation would "cause far less political trauma" than allowing his inauguration because it would uphold the constitution.
She also raised the issue of the concealment of Obama's records.
"Obama has refused to submit certified copies of any of his original long form 'vault' birth certificates in Hawaii to any public officer or to any Petitioner. Relevant records in Kenya have also been officially restricted," she said. "Obama has sealed all educational records which might reveal his stated citizenship. These include Punahou High School, Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School."
Her letter included a warning, too.
"Thirty-three democracies descended into tyranny during the 20th century by failing to uphold constitutional protections," she said. "Petitioner humbly prays this Court evaluate the Petitioner's case in context of how best to enforce restrictive qualifications for president to preserve the Constitution and Republic from tyranny."
WND twice has organized opportunities for readers to send FedEx letters to the Supreme Court, asking for consideration of the issue on its merits.
The most recent campaign generated 12,096 messages, following the earlier effort that resulted in 60,128 letters.
Obama has claimed in his autobiography and elsewhere that he was born in Hawaii in 1961 to parents Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a Kenyan national, and Stanley Ann Dunham, a minor. But details about which hospital handled the birth and other details provided on the complete birth certificate have been withheld by Obama despite lawsuits and public demands for release.
WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi went to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.
The biggest question was why, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn't simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors.
The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?
IS OBAMA TRULY LEGAL, THEN WHY CAN'T HE SHOW THE PROOF?
Urgent – Write Letters to Supreme Court Justices and Urgent - Please donate toward the costs of bringing these actions
Urgent – Need for Money
Time is our enemy and we have to be prepared.
We are working day & night to be prepared for the next proceeding: whether to appear in Court in Washington, D.C., or to prepare documents for Court, or to prepare Press Releases to keep people aware of our progress.
As you know, this Friday, January 9, 2009 our case, Berg vs. Obama, is being "Conferenced" by the nine [9] Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court [Docket No. 08 – 570]. Then, on January 16, 2009 again, we have a "Conference" before the U.S. Supreme Court in this case.
Also, we have pending two [2] other cases because we are determined, no matter how long it takes, to expose Obama’s “Hoax” on the 305 million people in our country, that Obama is “not qualified” pursuant to our U.S. Constitution to be President.
The new case is Hollister vs. Barry Soetoro a/k/a Obama filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Docket # 08-02254 (JR). Hollister is a retired U.S. Air Force Colonel that can be recalled at any time by the President. His dilemma – is Obama a “qualified” President that he must take orders from or is he “not qualified” and therefore, he is required to legally disobey Obama’s orders? The other case is “under seal” and therefore, I cannot discuss.
Request – Everyone who can - Please raise, by asking five [5] friends @ $10.00 each, or contribute $50.00 to us now. You can use PayPal or credit card on our website [obamacrimes.com] or mail a check to:
Phil Berg for Obama Crimes
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Phil
Saturday, January 17, 2009
Israel vs Ishmael of today. SEE THE FACTS.
FROM JERRY GOLDEN.
I didn't write this but I did a little research and it is all true, but then it really wasn't necessary to research as it is just common known facts. But so often never said or thought of by the masses who are so quick to condemn Israel by believing the CFR controlled media.
The Global Islamic population is approximately 2,000,000,000 or 33% of
the world's population. They have received the following Nobel Prizes:
Literature:
1988 - Najib Mahfooz
Peace:
1978 - Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
1994 - Yaser Arafat:
1990 - Elias James Corey
1999 - Ahmed Zewai
Economics: (zero)
Physics: (zero)
Medicine:
1960 - Peter Brian Medawar
1998 - Ferid Mourad
TOTAL: SEVEN
HOWEVER:
The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000, or about 0.02% of the world's population.
They have received the following Nobel Prizes:
Literature:
1910 - Paul Heyse
1927 - Henri Bergson
1958 - Boris Pa sternak
1966 - Shmuel Yosef Agnon
1966 - Nelly Sachs
1976 - Saul Bellow
1978 - Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 - Elias Canetti
1987 - Joseph Brodsky
1991 - Nadine Gordimer World
Peace:
1911 - Alfred Fried
1911 - Tobias Michael Carel Asser
1968 - Rene Cassin
1973 - Henry Kissinger
1978 - Menachem Begin
1986 - Elie Wiesel
1994 - Shimon Peres
1994 - Yitzhak Rabin
Physics:
1905 - Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 - Henri Moissan
1907 - Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 - Gabriel Lippmann
1910 - Otto Wallach
1915 - Richard Willstaetter
1918 - Fritz Haber
1921 - Albert Einstein
1922 - Niels Bohr
1925 - James Franck
1925 - Gustav Hertz
1943 - Gustav Stern
1943 - George Charles de Hevesy
1944 - Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 - Felix Bloch
1954 - Max Born
1958 - Igor Tamm
1959 - Emilio Segre
1960 - Donald A. Glaser
1961 - Robert Hofstadter
1961 - Melvin Calvin
1962 - Lev Davidovich Landau
1962 - Max Ferdinand Perutz
1965 - Richard Phil lips Feynman
1965 - Julian Schwinger
1969 - Murray Gell-Mann
1971 - Dennis Gabor
1972 - William Howard Stein
1973 - Brian David Joseph son
1975 - Benjamin Mottleson
1976 - Burton Richter
1977 - Ilya Prigogine
1978 - Arno Allan Penzias
1978 - Peter L Kapitza
1979 - Stephen Weinberg
1979 - Sheldon Glashow
1979 - Herbert Charles Brown
1980 - Paul Berg
1980 - Walter Gilbert
1981 - Roald Hoffmann
1982 - Aaron Klug
1985 - Albert A. Hauptman
1985 - Jerome Karle
1986 - Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 - Robert Huber
1988 - Leon Lederman
1988 - Melvin Schwartz
1988 - Jack Steinberger
1989 - Sidney Altman
1990 - Jerome Friedman
1992 - Rudolph Marcus
1995 - Martin Perl
2000 - Alan J. Heeger
Economics:
1970 - Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 - Simon Kuznets
1972 - Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 - Leonid Kantorovich
1976 - Mil ton Friedman
1978 - Herb ert A. Simon
1980 - Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 - Franco Modigliani
1987 - Robert M. Solow
1990 - Harry Markowitz
1 990 - Merton Miller
1992 - Gary Becker
1993 - Robert Fogel
Medicine:
1908 - Elie Metchnikoff
1908 - Paul Erlich
1914 - Robert Barany
1922 - Otto Meyerhof
1930 - Karl Landsteiner
1931 - Otto Warburg
1936 - Otto Loewi
1944 - Joseph Erlanger
1944 - Herb ert Spencer Gasser
1945 - Ernst Boris Chain
1946 - Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 - Tadeus Reichstein
1952 - Selman Abra ham Waksman
1953 - Hans Krebs
1953 - Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 - Joshua Lederberg
1959 - Arthur Kornberg
1964 - Konrad Bloch
1965 - Francois Jacob
1965 - Andre Lwoff
1967 - George Wald
1968 - Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 - Salvador Luria
1970 - Julius Axelrod
1970 - Sir Bernard Katz
1972 - Gerald Maurice Ed elman
1975 - Howard Martin Temin
1976 - Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 - Roselyn Sussman Yalow
1978 - Daniel Nathans
1980 - Baruj Benacerraf
1984 - Cesar Milstein
1985 - Michael Stuart Brown
1985 - Joseph L. Goldstein
1986 - Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 - Gertrude Elion
1989 - Harold Varmus
1991 - Erwin Neher
1991 - Bert Sakmann
1993 - Richard J. Roberts
1993 - Phillip Sharp
1994 - Alfred Gilman
1995 - Ed ward B. Lewis
TOTAL: 129
The Jews are NOT promoting brain washing children in military training
camps, teaching them how to blow themselves up and cause maximum deaths
of Jews and other non Muslims!
The Jews don't hijack planes, nor kill athletes at the Olympics, or blow
themselves up in German restaurants. There is NOT one single Jew that
has destroyed a church. There is NOT a single Jew that protests by
killing people.
The Jews don't traffic slaves, nor have leaders calling for Jihad and
death to all the Infidels.
Perhaps the world's Muslims should consider investing more in standard
education and less in blaming the Jews for all their problems.
Muslims must ask 'what can they do for humankind' before they demand
that humankind respects them!!
Regardless of your feelings about the crisis between Israel and the
Palestinians and Arab neighbors, even if you believe there is more
culpability on Israel 's part, the following two sentences really say it
all:
'If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more
violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel ' -Benjamin Netanyahu
Thursday, January 15, 2009
Abortion memorial to honor 50 million dead
Another report on the disgusting wiles of the wicked but this time it is a warning for those who continue to allow ABORTION to still be a wicked sacrifice of the innocent who have never even left the womb.
Saying your prochoice is such a cowardly statement. No one and I mean no one who commits adultery has the right to irresponsibly make a CHOICE to kill the unborn in the womb. LIFE begins a conception what part of that FACT do you not understand?
QUIT FORNICATION and trying to justify your sinful actions. You reap what you sow period in all things, GOD can never be mocked GET IT?
Job 39:16
She is hardened against her young ones, as though they were not hers; her labor is in vain because she has no sense of danger [for her unborn brood],
READER, If you are a person that went through this CHOICE like I have but on the other side of the coin, GOD is still waiting for you to cry out to HIM. Let HIM transform you now to HIS image and his likeness now. Come NOW be BORN FROM ABOVE so you can enter the Kingdom of GOD in Christ JESUS. HE is ready to show mercy and forgive all your sins.
For JESUS knows exactly where you are at. For HE is a GOD who understands and has been through all the HUMAN things and knows what it is like. HE suffered and died so you and I can LIVE. That is TRUE LOVE And HE was resurrected on SO we all can be justified by Faith alone.
He is calling all to repentance. Will you continue to reject HIM too?
Today is the day of salvation.
RW JAN 2008
WND Exclusive MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH
Abortion memorial to honor 50 million dead
Cyberspace project intended to support personhood campaign
Posted: January 15, 2009
12:00 am Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
The 58,000 names on the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, D.C., occupy a 10-foot wall that is 500 feet long, so pro-life activists assembling a memorial for the estimated 50 million dead as a result of the 1973 legalization of abortion had to turn to cyberspace.
That's because a wall with that many names would be more than 80 miles long.
The new project, called Personhood, is intended to raise awareness of the cost of abortion in American lives and generate support for a series of advertisements that address the personhood issue: the idea that constitutional rights should be conferred on the unborn.
Dan Becker, the chief of Georgia Right to Life, which has been involved in battling for recognition of personhood rights, said the response has been phenomenal.
The site offers the opportunity for visitors to submit a name of an abortion holocaust victim and contribute to the effort to publicize the ads, one of which is embedded here:
In the ad, two prospective parents discuss options for their coming child with a doctor. The physician describes the wonderful genetic advances that have just been developed as they talk about the sex of the child - male - and hair color, blonde.
The discussion is interrupted when the couple's young daughter, apparently born before such technological innovations, turns to her mother and asks: "Would you love me more if I were perfect?"
Hundreds of visitors have been visiting the site daily to participate, organizers for the site said.
Supportpersonhood.com features a short video describing the goal of remembering individual victims of abortion by granting them an identity and providing an epitaph, thereby personalizing the loss.
"Unlike the Jewish Holocaust, there are no pictures of death and destruction to prick our consciences and bring these dark deeds into the light. There is no enduring reminder that these children were our hope and our future," Becker said.
"They are voiceless, faceless and anonymous thereby leaving no lasting impression of their short existence," he said.
"The purpose of this project is to promote personhood within our culture," said Becker.
"We need to be a voice for the voiceless, and we saw this as a way to portray the loss that each individual human life represents. By naming each child, we clothe them in death with the human dignity they deserve," he said.
Individuals are asked to "adopt a child" and provide it an identity and leave a short memorial message. The wall is searchable and the "adoptions" of others may be viewed.
The concept, a new effort by many pro-life activists across the nation, was described in a commentary by Robert Muise of the Thomas More Law Center.
"While seeking to decrease the number of abortions performed in this country is a laudable endeavor and should continue, we must never forget that ending all abortions is the ultimate goal," he said. "Protecting innocent human life is not negotiable.
He said while critics argue that regulating abortion and seeking to end abortion are "either-or" propositions, they aren't.
"There is no conflict between the two positions, so long as principle is not compromised in the process. Both strategies can and must coexist. However, it would be a tragic mistake to be content with a strategy that makes ending abortion secondary to other regulatory efforts, or worse yet, a strategy that avoids it altogether. Accordingly, passing a human life amendment should be the pro-life movement's main effort," he said.
He suggested a case needs to be presented to the United States Supreme Court to challenge the central premise of Roe – that the unborn is not a person within the meaning of the law.
"In Roe," he said, "the court conceded that if the 'personhood' of the fetus 'is established, [the case for abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [Fourteenth] Amendment.'"
Major Perversion ritual to usher in Obama's inaugeration?
Proverbs 3:32
For the perverse are an abomination [extremely disgusting and detestable] to the Lord; but His confidential communion and secret counsel are with the [uncompromisingly] righteous (those who are upright and in right standing with Him).
[Images of devices to be made available at a Washington party for homosexuals]
COMMENTARY: And the PERVERSION continues.... HOW I despise even writing about this but the warnings must continue....
Is there anyone beside myself that will actually stand against this PERVERSION and report the truth of these disgusting behaviours? How many times do you have to hear the FACTS that Homosexuality amongst all the other is right up there with MAJOR PERVERSION. It is an Abominable act against NATURE and the ONE who created NATURE period, how hard is this to understand. The true bigots are the ones who are in these SHAMEFUL acts of SINFUL PERVERSIONS who go against nature and that is a FACT, see the truth in this verses.
# Proverbs 28:9
He who turns away his ear from hearing the law [of God and man], even his prayer is an abomination, hateful and revolting [to God].
# Proverbs 29:27
An unjust man is an abomination to the righteous, and he who is upright in the way [of the Lord] is an abomination to the wicked.
What part of the FACTS OF "unnatural acts" does not anyone understand anymore? And those who support, tolerate, accept etc who are in office want Society to accept and tolerate these PERVERSIONS? What a disgrace and we who seek after righteousness continue to not even speak warnings against these acts. WHERE IS YOUR FAITH? This is SICK perversion plain and simple and it is an outrage to AMERICA. These SICK lifestyles does not bear the mark of EQUALITY, liberty or freedom but this is utterly a sickly sewer filled disgrace to mankind. I guess SODOM and GAMMORA has majorly lost its impact or has it? But GOD promised HE will punish SIN and judgment has come and is coming AMERICA. Romans 9:22
What if God, although fully intending to show [the awfulness of] His wrath and to make known His power and authority, has tolerated with much patience the vessels (objects) of [His] anger which are ripe for destruction?
It is not too late YET sinner for you to realize your condemned already and GOD had made a way for you to escape right now. One day it will be too late for you OH LOST ONES. JESUS is calling all to repentance and conversion now. Will you reject HIM still?
RW Jan 2008
Leviticus 18:22
You shall not lie with a man as with a woman; it is an abomination.
Leviticus 18:27
For all these abominations have the men of the land done who were before you, and the land is defiled--........
Caution: The following contains a report on activities many will find objectionable.
WND Exclusive 'PIG SEX orgy set for inaugural week
Christian ministry documents homosexuals' Washington party plan
Posted: January 15, 2009
12:00 am Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
# Deuteronomy 18:12
For all who do these things are an abomination to the Lord, and it is because of these abominable practices that the Lord your God is driving them out before you.
Deuteronomy 22:5
The woman shall not wear that which pertains to a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment, for all that do so are an abomination to the Lord your God.
A homosexual "pig sex" orgy has been planned at a Washington hotel just as the traditional inaugural party season – this year honoring President-elect Barack Obama – is beginning, according to a Christian group that ministers to homosexuals.
The report comes from Peter LaBarbera at Americans for Truth about Homosexuality, who obtained the information via e-mail from a source within the homosexual community.
The e-mail warned that only people on the e-mail list and the "pre-approved" would be admitted.
"This Maneuvers is a PRIVATE and INVITATION-ONLY event. It will be held at the nearby Doubletree Hotel, located at 1515 Rhode Island Avenue NW. Go to the Second Floor, which is where all the Convention Rooms are," said the instructions.
The e-mail came from the Fort Troff "MAL Maneuvers" organization, according to AFTAH.
"We've now got a KILLER line up of DEMOS, including super skilled rope bondage, sounds play, and flogging. LIVE Music and Sound is gonna be provided by THE BLACK PARTY DJ Rich King. So you can s---, fist, rim, and [f---] TO THE BEAT."
Among a variety of features were "a bondage cross," "a flogging station" and "rimming stations." LaBarbera said the references to "fist" and "rim" refer to specific homosexual behaviors, which he explains graphically on his website.
"Doors open at 10 p.m. and will close at 12 midnight. No admission after 12. Play continues until 4am. …" said the e-mail.
The requirements, AFTAH said, included, "Masculine, friendly, and ready to play. Spectators who wanna run their mouths and socialize are not welcome at this event. We are here to enjoy the company of MEN."
The online Urban Dictionary defines "pig sex" as "outrageously dirty such as water spots, defecation, male on male bondage, group-sex and bestiality," although there was no indication that this event would involve animals.
LaBarbera said the hotel confirmed MAL Maneuvers has booked three second-floor conference rooms for three days, which starting with Saturday night's events would culminate on inauguration day, Tuesday. The hotel offered a discount for rooms for people attending the events.
"These repulsive behaviors should not occur in private, much less in conference rooms at a hotel used by the public," AFTAH's warning said.
LaBarbera has included graphic descriptions of the proposed activities on his website, but readers are warned of the offensive nature of the descriptions.
He also included a telephone number for the Doubletree Hotel, encouraging people to urge the Hilton chain, which owns the site, "to get out of the perversion business altogether." The events reportedly are being held in concert with the annual "Mid-Atlantic Leather Weekend," three days of sadomasochistic celebration in Washington.
LaBarbera previously has reported on "Leather" events held annually at the Palmer House Hilton in Chicago and has criticized the company for its "long history of enabling and profiting off of the hyper-promiscuous 'leather' movement by hosting the annual sadomasochistic 'International Mr. Leather' conference."
LaBarbera said he contacted the Washington hotel's sales director, who confirmed the lease to the "Fort Troff" group. But the spokesman said he knew nothing of any sex events planned there. He said such events could not be held in the hotel's conference rooms, because they are "public space," LaBarbera said.
The spokesman, Felix Barreras, told LaBarbera the contract for the rooms was handled "like any other piece of business." The hotel did not respond to a separate WND request for comment.
Barreras said sex is not allowed in public areas, and it could pose a health hazard to other guests.
LaBarbera told WND a high volume of calls from the public probably would convince the hotel to cancel its agreement.
He noted the inherent risks confirmed even by homosexual websites linked on his site of the dangers from hepatitis.
Obama, during his campaign and since the election, repeatedly has affirmed his support for homosexual rights, and his aides have said that they expect him to announce he will lift the ban on open homosexuality in the U.S. military almost as soon as he is sworn into office.
WND also reported when LaBarbera and others documented public homosexual sex events at the annual Folsom Street Fair in San Francisco.
These two fans of the Folsom Street Fair in San Francisco yesterday we wearing no more below their waist that they were above their waist in this photograph by Americans for Truth, which was cropped for use on WND
"It is no coincidence that the man who took it upon himself four years ago to illegally and radically redefine marriage – Mayor Gavin Newsom – now enthusiastically welcomes the Folsom Street with its public depravities – an event that makes San Francisco a subject of ridicule and opprobrium the world over," LaBarbera said about the 2008 event.
The festival, which celebrates deviant sex, including homosexual activities, has turned in recent years into a daylong showing of nudity and public sex acts with promotions of the unnatural and pornographic – all on the public streets of San Francisco with formal approval from Newsom.
"Entry signs to the fair said, 'Nudity is illegal,' but thousands of people took advantage of the fact that nudity and decency laws were not enforced by the police," said LaBarbera's report on the 2008 event.
He published several edited photographs documenting the rampant exhibitionism and nudity.
WND also has reported on a similar festival, called "Up Your Alley," in which police took no action to enforce decency laws. The behavior was documented in photographs of the event, which was sponsored by the same group that organizes the Folsom Street Fair.
# Revelation 21:8
But as for the cowards and the ignoble and the contemptible and the cravenly lacking in courage and the cowardly submissive, and as for the unbelieving and faithless, and as for the depraved and defiled with abominations, and as for murderers and the lewd and adulterous and the practicers of magic arts and the idolaters (those who give supreme devotion to anyone or anything other than God) and all liars (those who knowingly convey untruth by word or deed)--[all of these shall have] their part in the lake that blazes with fire and brimstone. This is the second death.
# Revelation 21:27
But nothing that defiles or profanes or is unwashed shall ever enter it, nor anyone who commits abominations (unclean, detestable, morally repugnant things) or practices falsehood, but only those whose names are recorded in the Lamb's Book of Life.
For the perverse are an abomination [extremely disgusting and detestable] to the Lord; but His confidential communion and secret counsel are with the [uncompromisingly] righteous (those who are upright and in right standing with Him).
[Images of devices to be made available at a Washington party for homosexuals]COMMENTARY: And the PERVERSION continues.... HOW I despise even writing about this but the warnings must continue....
Is there anyone beside myself that will actually stand against this PERVERSION and report the truth of these disgusting behaviours? How many times do you have to hear the FACTS that Homosexuality amongst all the other is right up there with MAJOR PERVERSION. It is an Abominable act against NATURE and the ONE who created NATURE period, how hard is this to understand. The true bigots are the ones who are in these SHAMEFUL acts of SINFUL PERVERSIONS who go against nature and that is a FACT, see the truth in this verses.
# Proverbs 28:9
He who turns away his ear from hearing the law [of God and man], even his prayer is an abomination, hateful and revolting [to God].
# Proverbs 29:27
An unjust man is an abomination to the righteous, and he who is upright in the way [of the Lord] is an abomination to the wicked.
What part of the FACTS OF "unnatural acts" does not anyone understand anymore? And those who support, tolerate, accept etc who are in office want Society to accept and tolerate these PERVERSIONS? What a disgrace and we who seek after righteousness continue to not even speak warnings against these acts. WHERE IS YOUR FAITH? This is SICK perversion plain and simple and it is an outrage to AMERICA. These SICK lifestyles does not bear the mark of EQUALITY, liberty or freedom but this is utterly a sickly sewer filled disgrace to mankind. I guess SODOM and GAMMORA has majorly lost its impact or has it? But GOD promised HE will punish SIN and judgment has come and is coming AMERICA. Romans 9:22
What if God, although fully intending to show [the awfulness of] His wrath and to make known His power and authority, has tolerated with much patience the vessels (objects) of [His] anger which are ripe for destruction?
It is not too late YET sinner for you to realize your condemned already and GOD had made a way for you to escape right now. One day it will be too late for you OH LOST ONES. JESUS is calling all to repentance and conversion now. Will you reject HIM still?
RW Jan 2008
Leviticus 18:22
You shall not lie with a man as with a woman; it is an abomination.
Leviticus 18:27
For all these abominations have the men of the land done who were before you, and the land is defiled--........
Caution: The following contains a report on activities many will find objectionable.
WND Exclusive 'PIG SEX orgy set for inaugural week
Christian ministry documents homosexuals' Washington party plan
Posted: January 15, 2009
12:00 am Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
# Deuteronomy 18:12
For all who do these things are an abomination to the Lord, and it is because of these abominable practices that the Lord your God is driving them out before you.
Deuteronomy 22:5
The woman shall not wear that which pertains to a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment, for all that do so are an abomination to the Lord your God.
A homosexual "pig sex" orgy has been planned at a Washington hotel just as the traditional inaugural party season – this year honoring President-elect Barack Obama – is beginning, according to a Christian group that ministers to homosexuals.
The report comes from Peter LaBarbera at Americans for Truth about Homosexuality, who obtained the information via e-mail from a source within the homosexual community.
The e-mail warned that only people on the e-mail list and the "pre-approved" would be admitted.
"This Maneuvers is a PRIVATE and INVITATION-ONLY event. It will be held at the nearby Doubletree Hotel, located at 1515 Rhode Island Avenue NW. Go to the Second Floor, which is where all the Convention Rooms are," said the instructions.
The e-mail came from the Fort Troff "MAL Maneuvers" organization, according to AFTAH.
"We've now got a KILLER line up of DEMOS, including super skilled rope bondage, sounds play, and flogging. LIVE Music and Sound is gonna be provided by THE BLACK PARTY DJ Rich King. So you can s---, fist, rim, and [f---] TO THE BEAT."
Among a variety of features were "a bondage cross," "a flogging station" and "rimming stations." LaBarbera said the references to "fist" and "rim" refer to specific homosexual behaviors, which he explains graphically on his website.
"Doors open at 10 p.m. and will close at 12 midnight. No admission after 12. Play continues until 4am. …" said the e-mail.
The requirements, AFTAH said, included, "Masculine, friendly, and ready to play. Spectators who wanna run their mouths and socialize are not welcome at this event. We are here to enjoy the company of MEN."
The online Urban Dictionary defines "pig sex" as "outrageously dirty such as water spots, defecation, male on male bondage, group-sex and bestiality," although there was no indication that this event would involve animals.
LaBarbera said the hotel confirmed MAL Maneuvers has booked three second-floor conference rooms for three days, which starting with Saturday night's events would culminate on inauguration day, Tuesday. The hotel offered a discount for rooms for people attending the events.
"These repulsive behaviors should not occur in private, much less in conference rooms at a hotel used by the public," AFTAH's warning said.
LaBarbera has included graphic descriptions of the proposed activities on his website, but readers are warned of the offensive nature of the descriptions.
He also included a telephone number for the Doubletree Hotel, encouraging people to urge the Hilton chain, which owns the site, "to get out of the perversion business altogether." The events reportedly are being held in concert with the annual "Mid-Atlantic Leather Weekend," three days of sadomasochistic celebration in Washington.
LaBarbera previously has reported on "Leather" events held annually at the Palmer House Hilton in Chicago and has criticized the company for its "long history of enabling and profiting off of the hyper-promiscuous 'leather' movement by hosting the annual sadomasochistic 'International Mr. Leather' conference."
LaBarbera said he contacted the Washington hotel's sales director, who confirmed the lease to the "Fort Troff" group. But the spokesman said he knew nothing of any sex events planned there. He said such events could not be held in the hotel's conference rooms, because they are "public space," LaBarbera said.
The spokesman, Felix Barreras, told LaBarbera the contract for the rooms was handled "like any other piece of business." The hotel did not respond to a separate WND request for comment.
Barreras said sex is not allowed in public areas, and it could pose a health hazard to other guests.
LaBarbera told WND a high volume of calls from the public probably would convince the hotel to cancel its agreement.
He noted the inherent risks confirmed even by homosexual websites linked on his site of the dangers from hepatitis.
Obama, during his campaign and since the election, repeatedly has affirmed his support for homosexual rights, and his aides have said that they expect him to announce he will lift the ban on open homosexuality in the U.S. military almost as soon as he is sworn into office.
WND also reported when LaBarbera and others documented public homosexual sex events at the annual Folsom Street Fair in San Francisco.
These two fans of the Folsom Street Fair in San Francisco yesterday we wearing no more below their waist that they were above their waist in this photograph by Americans for Truth, which was cropped for use on WND
"It is no coincidence that the man who took it upon himself four years ago to illegally and radically redefine marriage – Mayor Gavin Newsom – now enthusiastically welcomes the Folsom Street with its public depravities – an event that makes San Francisco a subject of ridicule and opprobrium the world over," LaBarbera said about the 2008 event.
The festival, which celebrates deviant sex, including homosexual activities, has turned in recent years into a daylong showing of nudity and public sex acts with promotions of the unnatural and pornographic – all on the public streets of San Francisco with formal approval from Newsom.
"Entry signs to the fair said, 'Nudity is illegal,' but thousands of people took advantage of the fact that nudity and decency laws were not enforced by the police," said LaBarbera's report on the 2008 event.
He published several edited photographs documenting the rampant exhibitionism and nudity.
WND also has reported on a similar festival, called "Up Your Alley," in which police took no action to enforce decency laws. The behavior was documented in photographs of the event, which was sponsored by the same group that organizes the Folsom Street Fair.
# Revelation 21:8
But as for the cowards and the ignoble and the contemptible and the cravenly lacking in courage and the cowardly submissive, and as for the unbelieving and faithless, and as for the depraved and defiled with abominations, and as for murderers and the lewd and adulterous and the practicers of magic arts and the idolaters (those who give supreme devotion to anyone or anything other than God) and all liars (those who knowingly convey untruth by word or deed)--[all of these shall have] their part in the lake that blazes with fire and brimstone. This is the second death.
# Revelation 21:27
But nothing that defiles or profanes or is unwashed shall ever enter it, nor anyone who commits abominations (unclean, detestable, morally repugnant things) or practices falsehood, but only those whose names are recorded in the Lamb's Book of Life.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
SEE AND BE SENSIBLE.
SEE AND BE SENSIBLE.
Psalm 25:11 For thy names sake, oh LORD, pardon mine iniquity and my guilt; For they are great.
WE should see our misery, and be sensible of our need for mercy.
They who are not sensible of their misery cannot truly look to GOD for mercy; for it is the very notion of divine mercy, that it is the goodness and the grace of GOD to the miserable.
WITHOUT misery in the object, there can be no exercise of mercy. To suppose mercy without supposing misery, or pity without calamity, it is a contradiction:
therefore men cannot look upon themselves as proper objects of mercy, unless they first know themselves to be miserable; and so unless this be the case, it is impossible that they should come to GOD for mercy.
THEY must be sensible that they are children of wrath; that the LAW is against them, and that they are exposed to the CURSE of it: that the wrath of GOD abideth upon them; and that HE is angry with them every day while they are under the guilt of SIN.
THEY must be sensible that it is a very dreadful thing to be the object of the wrath of GOD; that it is a very awful thing to have HIM for their enemy; and that they cannot bear HIS wrath.
THEY must be sensible that the guilt of SIN makes them miserable creatures, whatever temporal enjoyments they have; that they can be no other than miserable, undone creatures, so long as GOD is angry with them: that they are without strength, and MUST perish, and that eternally, unless GOD help them.
THEY must see that their case is utterly desperate, for anything that anyone else can do for them;that they hang over the pit of eternal misery; and that they must necessarily drop into it, if GOD have not mercy on them.
(Puritan Jonathan Edwards 1668– 1759)
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Ron Paul on Israel, Obama, the economy etc. YEP YOU GUESSED IT NOT FOR THE AMERICAN PUBLIC TO KNOW.
So stupid American here is more truth to the reality Americans seem to continue to ignore. Why in America cannot we have the truth told to US plainly and have to search else where like RT, Russian Television etc for interviews like this. The American media will never allow you to know reality except only the false reality they want to feed you.
Richard White (stupid American)
Common sense, isn't it?
I'll let Ron Paul do the speaking.
Except to say that it's a shame that the only news media interested in his pro-American policies are in places like Russia.
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/529.html
Richard White (stupid American)
Common sense, isn't it?
I'll let Ron Paul do the speaking.
Except to say that it's a shame that the only news media interested in his pro-American policies are in places like Russia.
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/529.html
Friday, January 9, 2009
REAL FREE PRESS NEWS ABOUT THE ISRAELI OFFENSIVE.
COMMENTARY: Continuous reporting by those who want a FREE PRESS including LRR of what the immoral MEDIA moguls do not want to to see which is the TRUTH and FACTS. Aren't you sick and tired of Corporate owned and Government controlled media networks deliberate LIES? DID YOU KNOW THAT HAMAS AND EVERY OTHER RADICAL NOMAD ARAB JIHAD GROUPS KICKED OUT OF ARABIA (especially those that claim they are Palestinians which ONLY JEWS ARE ALONE THE NICKNAMED PALESTINAINS BY THE ROMANS GET IT?) have been randomly firing Rockets into Israel for eight years? And it took eight years for Israel to actually go to this extreme to go after those responsible for these stupidly unnecessary WMD attacks? After all when the rejected refugee Arabs decided to settle in Israel, DID NOT ISRAEL HELP THEM AND GIVE THEM COMMUNITIES, GAVE THEM FUNDS TO BUILD UP THEIR HOMES AND BUSINESSES ETC ETC. There is even a Cabinet and political party of ARABS in the Knesset isn't there? WHY is this not NEWS?
Please American if we can all go after the MEDIA and hold them accountable by taking them to court and really giving the PUBIC EYE what every American as well as every other FREE MORAL MINDED citizens of the World deserves is the TRUTH and FACTS from the MEDIA'S ill repute and reporting what their agendas hold only, then we will cipher through all other forms of poopaganda they continue to shove down our throats. They will be held accountable and they know it. BUT IT IS UP TO YOUR TO FIGHT WITH THE REST OF THE FREE AGENCY MINDED FOLKS WHO CARE. Or do you not care?
RW
Shalom,
Here you can see the big picture of the major News Media, I don't need to elaborate the pictures tell it all.
Shalom, jerry golden
THESE ARE THE IMAGES THEY SHOW:
THESE ARE THE IMAGES THEY DO NOT EVER SHOW.
So tell me why does not anyone report about the eight years that Israel held off from any real retaliation from the rockets that continued to hit israel ever since. And why does the MEDIA, UN, US, Europe, etc etc continue to call the ARAB REFUGEES Palestinian
When that was THE GIVEN NAME the ROMANS 2000 or more years ago gave to the JEWS? Tell why when Israel became a nation in 1948 that the British as well recognized the same ROMAN name that the JEWS were the true Palestinians. DO YOU SEE HOW TRUTH GETS DISTORTED BY THE PURPOSELY UNINFORMED? What about how the real Palestinians THE JEWS instead of further rejecting the ARAB refugees, they actually built towns and communities, funding them, tolerating their MUSLIM lies and beliefs even to the point of not dismantling the DOME of the ROCK MOON GOD temple and allowing them to worship freely which goes against GOD's very Torah? (SEE commandments 1-4).
Still Israel the nation has compassion for the arab refugees and they have a right to retaliate against the dogs that bite the hand that feeds. Pray fro peace in Israel not a Palestinian state for the Palestinians THE JEWS already have a NATION. Pray that the ARAB refugee communities realize once an for all that ISRAEL is deserving nation alone and if they want to be part of ISRAEL just abide in the LAND as Israel requires. IT is not forced occupation as the LIE continues. Peace can only be achieved if the TRUTH MATTERS.
RW
Please American if we can all go after the MEDIA and hold them accountable by taking them to court and really giving the PUBIC EYE what every American as well as every other FREE MORAL MINDED citizens of the World deserves is the TRUTH and FACTS from the MEDIA'S ill repute and reporting what their agendas hold only, then we will cipher through all other forms of poopaganda they continue to shove down our throats. They will be held accountable and they know it. BUT IT IS UP TO YOUR TO FIGHT WITH THE REST OF THE FREE AGENCY MINDED FOLKS WHO CARE. Or do you not care?
RW
Shalom,
Here you can see the big picture of the major News Media, I don't need to elaborate the pictures tell it all.
Shalom, jerry golden
THESE ARE THE IMAGES THEY SHOW:
THESE ARE THE IMAGES THEY DO NOT EVER SHOW.
So tell me why does not anyone report about the eight years that Israel held off from any real retaliation from the rockets that continued to hit israel ever since. And why does the MEDIA, UN, US, Europe, etc etc continue to call the ARAB REFUGEES Palestinian
When that was THE GIVEN NAME the ROMANS 2000 or more years ago gave to the JEWS? Tell why when Israel became a nation in 1948 that the British as well recognized the same ROMAN name that the JEWS were the true Palestinians. DO YOU SEE HOW TRUTH GETS DISTORTED BY THE PURPOSELY UNINFORMED? What about how the real Palestinians THE JEWS instead of further rejecting the ARAB refugees, they actually built towns and communities, funding them, tolerating their MUSLIM lies and beliefs even to the point of not dismantling the DOME of the ROCK MOON GOD temple and allowing them to worship freely which goes against GOD's very Torah? (SEE commandments 1-4).
Still Israel the nation has compassion for the arab refugees and they have a right to retaliate against the dogs that bite the hand that feeds. Pray fro peace in Israel not a Palestinian state for the Palestinians THE JEWS already have a NATION. Pray that the ARAB refugee communities realize once an for all that ISRAEL is deserving nation alone and if they want to be part of ISRAEL just abide in the LAND as Israel requires. IT is not forced occupation as the LIE continues. Peace can only be achieved if the TRUTH MATTERS.
RW
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Deliberate deconstruction of America AGAIN (VIDEO). WAKE UP PEOPLE.
Already and 2009 just begun? Of course. You see this is what happens when stupid people do not care about there freedom or their country.
America's identity crisis? Again will you wake up America?
COMMENTARY
Like weeds destroying a good crop so is the average American being fed UN-nutritional (literally) fertilizers from tyrannical foreign sources that want to denationalize the second best nation the world has ever seen and witnessed these last 200 years. America may be a beast as some say but WE THE PEOPLE can still fight daily for moral freedom daily if you choose to WAKE UP AMERICAN. Why is it so hard for any to believe that many want America to join the rest of the tyrannical world? Do they really want their freedom taken away that BAD subconsciously? Will you heed the warnings finally American?
RW
America's identity crisis
Posted: January 07, 2009
1:00 am Eastern
© 2009
Can you name the three branches of American government – legislative, executive and judicial? If so, you are among the one-half of Americans who know this very basic fact about the U.S. government and Constitution.
The Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI), which earlier has conducted in-depth studies of what American college students know, and don't know, about civics, now reports equally depressing facts about grown-ups. It appears that adults, too, lack the civic knowledge they need to be informed citizens and intelligent voters.
ISI administered a very basic test on American history, government and economics to 2,500 Americans age 25 and older. The multiple-choice test asked citizens to identify terms that everybody should know, such as the New Deal, the Electoral College, Sputnik, "I Have a Dream" and progressive tax.
The 2,500 adults scored an average of 49 percent – that means they get a pitiful F. Those who had received a bachelor's degree averaged 57 percent on the test, compared to 44 percent for those with only a high school diploma. Worse still, 164 adults who had held elected office also scored an average of 44 percent.
Almost 40 percent of respondents said they thought the president (rather than Congress) has the power to declare war. Only 50 percent knew that Congress shares authority with the president over U.S. foreign policy. And almost one in four thought Congress shares authority over U.S. foreign policy with the United Nations.
(Column continues below)
Americans who lack knowledge of our country's history, Constitution and institutions really have no frame of reference to judge current politics and policies. Federal law requires public schools to teach about the U.S. Constitution on Constitution Day, Sept. 17, but it looks like American adults need those lessons, too.
The 2006 National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) Civics Test revealed that the majority of eighth-graders could not explain the purpose of the Declaration of Independence. No wonder young voters are not shocked at those who talk about "interdependence," globalism and becoming "citizens of the world."
It's not just that American citizens lack knowledge of historical and constitutional facts about our country, but they also show a declining appreciation of who we are. A survey by Harris Interactive reported that 84 percent of respondents believe we have a unique American identity, but 64 percent believe this identity is weakening, and 24 percent believe we are already so divided that a common national identity is impossible.
Political correctness in colleges and public schools over the last decade has gone a long way toward replacing patriotism with the trendy dicta of multiculturalism, diversity and global citizenship. Are we losing our identity as Americans?
To address this question, the Bradley Foundation has started a national conversation on America's National Identity called "E Pluribus Unum." The question is: Is America still "from many, one" ("indivisible," as our Pledge of Allegiance affirms), or are we fast becoming "from one, many"?
A review of history textbooks used in public schools today reveals a big source of the problem. Textbooks now emphasize America's faults and mistakes rather than our incredible achievements.
History textbooks should tell the exciting story that the United States has produced nearly all the world's greatest inventions and that these inventions have produced living standards that are the envy of the world. This exciting narrative is not based on Americans being smarter than other nationalities, or our having more natural resources than other countries, but on the wisdom of the Founding Fathers, who gave us the superior political and economic system enshrined in our Constitution.
We should celebrate and honor our nation's heroes, starting with George Washington. Federal law clearly specifies that the name of the "legal public holiday" on the third Monday in February is "Washington's Birthday."
Americans should refuse to buy the calendars that wrongly label this February holiday as "Presidents Day." This calendar mischief is very offensive because there are quite a few presidents who are not worthy of a special "day."
Maintaining our national identity depends on keeping our Constitution safe from the supremacist judges who want to change it to comport with what they call "emerging standards." Our national identity depends on keeping English as our official, national language so we don't suffer the conflicts endured by nations with competing languages.
America was founded by men who shared a common inheritance in the British rule of law developed over centuries (beginning with the Magna Carta), the Christian religion and the English language. They also shared the belief later expressed by Alexis de Tocqueville that America is "quite exceptional" and by Ronald Reagan that America is "the shining city on the hill."
The Gospel in 6 Minutes.
The Gospel in 6 Minutes
By John Piper September 12, 2007
What's the Gospel?
1. What’s the gospel? I’ll put it in a sentence.
The Gospel is the news that Jesus Christ, the Righteous One, died for our sins and rose again, eternally triumphant over all his enemies, so that there is now no condemnation for those who believe, but only everlasting joy.
That’s the gospel.
2. You Can't Outgrow the Gospel
You never, never, never outgrow your need for it. Don’t ever think of the gospel as, “That’s the way you get saved, and then you get strong by leaving it and doing something else.”
No! We are strengthened by God through the gospel every day, till the day we drop.
You never outgrow the need to preach to yourself the gospel.
3.How the Gospel Strengthens
Here’s an illustration, and I use it not because it’s any big deal to speak from my life, but because it’s what I walked through and where I most pointedly in the last year experienced the power of the gospel to make me strong. (Many of you are walking through things much heavier than prostate cancer—much heavier.)
Do you remember the verses that I shared with you back in February that were almighty for me? It was that moment right after the doctor says, “I think we need to do a biopsy,” when this stab of fear comes. It didn’t last long, mercifully.
And then came—what? 1Thessalonians 5:9-10. It’s just as pure gospel as you can get.
God has not destined you for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ,who died for you so that whether you wake or sleep you will live with him.
Settled. Peace like a river.
4.The Gospel Is Perfect for Your Needs
That’s just gospel—perfectly timed, perfectly applied, perfectly suited to my need. That’s why the Bible is so thick—because there are so many different needs that you have. And there are suitable places where the gospel is unfolded for you, so that if you immerse yourself in the whole book, always with an eye for what Christ has wrought for you and purchased for you in this thick, glorious history of God’s interaction with people, he will give you what you need.
Therefore, everything in me says, and I hope to say until the day I die, “Now, to him who is able to strengthen me, according to Paul’s gospel, to him—to that God—be glory forever and ever.”
God came into history in Jesus Christ; he died in order to destroy the power of hell and death and Satan and sin; and he did it through the gospel of Jesus Christ.
5. A Plea to Believe
I know that there are people reading this who are not trusting Jesus Christ, and therefore can only expect condemnation. So I’m just going to plead with you here at the end, lay down that rebellion. Lay it down. And simply embrace the gospel that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Righteous One, died for your sins. He was raised on the third day, triumphant over all his enemies. He reigns until he puts all of his enemies under his feet. Forgiveness of sins and a right standing with God comes freely through him alone, by faith alone.
I plead with you, don’t try to be strong in your own strength; it will not be there when you need it. Only one strength will be there—the strength that God gives according to the gospel.
Don’t put it off.
American Corporate Media should be sued for adding and detracting from the FIRST Amendment and totally misinterpreting the US Constitution.
[COMMENTARY]When is media ever fair and balanced?
How disgusting it is to have soft porn, questionable blasphemies, antichrist sitcoms, indulgent commercials, Perverted opposite and same sex promotions and voyeurism, Evolutionary pseudoscience fiction documentaries that embarrass true science facts, ultra mega violence, coward violence and whatever else that is immoral not mentioned. And to top it off with the worst of all, a free press that truly is not free and owned by private moguls with agendas running wild to prevent Americans for learning real truth and or ordered by dark shadows behind the scenes who are addicted to SELFish power mad with destruction it seems.
Let me explain what a FREE PRESS really is.
A FREE PRESS reports the hard truth regardless of personal opinion and stays with True facts that speak for itself contrary to public opinion or personal. A FREE PRESS does not hide secrets or have a personal agenda but only to keep all truth out in the open in the public eye at all costs. A FREE PRESS is not money mammon hungry or answers to the wealthy hordes personal agendas to keep things under raps so to speak. A FREE PRESS DOES NOT TAKE BRIBES AT ANY TIME. A FREE PRESS REALIZES THAT TOMORROW IS NEVER GUARANTEED. SO A FREE PRESS reports all truth at all times ever exposing the immorality so a society will remain free morally so it can stay FREE GET IT?
This is truly one of the major things our GOD Blessed Country was founded on and truly was meant for all to stay transparent so our society can remain FREE. But it is not the case at all isn't it. Our next President proclaimed many times that HE would be transparent and be held accountable. Well of course thus far he has shown that not to be true and he is not even in office yet. But it figures and of course we expected that right. Of course. But do not anyone care if our Constitution is a stake and if that goes or they try to reform it truly there will be no more GOD bless America and your lively hood will now be in check of the cowardly indulgent rulers who rule hanging mammon over our heads in high places just as history continues to prove to mankind over and over and mankind continues to be a dog returning to his vomit.
Will you continue to be a Self indulgent coward tolerating immorality too American being part of the problem or will you take your place with WE THE PEOPLE and continue to steer our Country in the ways of GOD?
I know times have majorly changed etc with all the wars, industrial, technology, all revolutions of industry, manufactured fit homes etc , huge progress, knowledge increased according to the Book of Daniel etc etc, in this the fast distracted age But the 200 year old Constitution still speaks loud and clear and should be NEVER tampered alter detracted or added onto unless it agrees with moral Constitutional rights that our Fore Fathers passed to down to all of US to keep these truths and hold them for dear life so our FREE SOCIETY will never be ruled by a immoral majority which would destroy our foundation and resurrect tyranny to which this country and WE THE PEOPLE was to never allow. EVER!
SO what is truly next AMERICAN? To reform America again and go back to ORIGINAL INTENT or allow Tyranny as cowards would I say again? You decide. I will continue to fight and end cowardliness on my part. Will you with me or will you allow your freedom to be stripped from you, line by line, here is a little there is a little?
Richard White TRUE MORAL AMERICAN AGAIN in JAN 2009
WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
TV networks: Don't raise eligibility questions
Fox, CNN, MSNBC all refuse permission for advertising time
Posted: January 08, 2009
12:14 am Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Barack Obama's campaign officials and transition office repeatedly have rejected reporters' requests for comment on questions raised over his lack of documentation regarding his birth and the resulting concerns over his eligibility to be president. Now a number of media organizations apparently don't want questions raised either.
WND columnist Janet Porter told WND she found that out when her organization, Faith2Action.org, tried to purchase airtime to publicize information about the eligibility concerns.
She told WND that national networks that refused to sell her time for a 60-second commercial included CNBC, MSNBC, Headline News, CNN and Fox. Washington, D.C., outlets for the same organizations did the same.
"With the date for congressional approval (of the Electoral College today), we wanted them to have access to the facts," she told WND. "Congress is sworn to uphold the Constitution."
She said the donors who contributed the funding that was to be used for the ads were being contacted to find out whether they wanted to reach another direction in the media.
The ad to be broadcast already is available on YouTube, and also is embedded here:
"Heard rumors about Barack Obama's citizenship? These are the facts," the ad states.
It cites a statement from the president-elect's paternal grandmother that she was present at his birth in Kenya, his refusal to release his original birth certificate, his attendance at school in Indonesia "as Barry Soetoro when only Indonesia citizens were permitted to attend," and Obama's travel to Pakistan in 1981 "when it was illegal to enter as a U.S. citizen."
Join the campaign to urge the Supreme Court to take the eligibility question seriously by FedExing the justices.
It concludes, "Our Constitution still matters."
"As requested, we backed up every sentence of this ad, and still it was rejected," Porter said. "What does that say about freedom of speech when we not only cannot count on the media to cover the story, but we can't even buy time to publicize what may be the biggest story of the century."
She raised several questions about the issue in her recent column.
"What if an impostor from another country ran for the presidency and won?" she asks. "What if the media blocked any news of his birthplace and citizenship? What if the media censorship even blocked paid advertising which tried to expose it?
"What if no one had the courage to challenge or verify it? What if he was inaugurated illegally? What if the military had to answer to a commander in chief who was illegitimate? What if every law he signed was invalid?"
And, she wonders, "What if it all happened on our watch?"
WND reported the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled Friday a conference – a private meeting at which justices consider whether to take individual cases – on a lawsuit challenging Obama's eligibility.
Twice before the justices have heard the questions, and twice before they've decided to ignore them.
The lingering questions continue to leave a cloud over the impending presidency of a man whose relatives have reported he was born in Kenya and who has decided, for whatever reason, not to release a bona fide copy of his original birth certificate in its complete form.
Multiple lawsuits have been filed around the nation alleging Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Some of the legal challenges have alleged Obama was not born in Hawaii, as he insists, but in Kenya. The woman identified by Obama as his American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time – especially if it took place in a foreign country and the man identified as his father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Kenyan citizen.
Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 200,000 others and sign the petition demanding proof of eligibility now!
Other challenges also have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. Such cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.
Several details of Obama's past have added twists to the question of his eligibility and citizenship, including his family's move to Indonesia when he was a child, his travel to Pakistan in the '80s when such travel was forbidden to American citizens and conflicting reports from Obama's family about his place of birth.
On Friday the justices will consider Philip J. Berg's Petition for Writ of Certiorari.
"This is a historic occasion that will impact the office of the president of the United States as never before. No one has ever brought an action against a president-elect candidate challenging his eligibility to serve based on the 'natural born' citizen requirement provided in the United States Constitution, Article II Section 1," said a statement on Berg's ObamaCrimes.com website.
Berg suggested if Obama "is allowed to be sworn in as president of the United States, there will be substantial and irrevocable harm to the stability of the United States of America and to its citizens."
"Because Barack Obama is not a 'natural born' citizen as required by the United States Constitution, then all of his actions as president would be null and void," Berg said.
Last month, WND reported similar concerns raised in a lawsuit filed in California.
"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void," argues a case brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes, also a presidential candidate. "Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal."
Berg, who has another case on the issue pending on behalf of a retired military officer, earlier stated, "I am determined, on behalf of the 320 million citizens in the United States, to see that 'our U.S. Constitution' is followed. Specifically, in the case of Soetoro a/k/a Obama, does he meet the constitutional qualifications for president?
"I am appalled that the mainstream media continue to ignore this issue as we are headed to a 'constitutional crisis.' There is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be enforced," he said.
The Supreme Court also has another hearing on an issue raised by Berg for Jan. 16, and the Supreme Court just confirmed today yet another conference is scheduled Jan. 23 on a separate case, this one handled by California attorney Orly Taitz, challenging Obama's eligibility.
Because of the high stakes, WND earlier launched a letter campaign to contact Electoral College members and urge them to review the controversy.
That followed a campaign that sent more than 60,000 letters by overnight delivery to the U.S. Supreme Court when one case contesting Obama's eligibility for the Oval Office was pending.
A separate petition, already signed by more than 200,000 also is ongoing asking authorities in the election to seek proof Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution.
WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi went to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.
The biggest question was why, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn't simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors
The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
No praying or moment of silence at inauguration! Since When?
Psalm 10:4
The wicked one in the pride of his countenance will not seek, inquire for, and yearn for God; all his thoughts are that there is no God.
COMMENTARY (See article below)
I always wonder as to why those that do not believe in GOD do not seem comfortable in believing that they do not believe in GOD. Take for instance those challenging with lawsuits about the next Presidential inauguration (article below). Why is it they have to waste everyone else time and tax payer money to persuade that public prayer or a moment of silence if that is also what one chooses, is not a right or is unconstitutional etc for anyone who firmly believe in GOD? Why does it bother them that much to go to extremes? Answer: Because they truly know they are filthy sinners internally inside, their consciences do bear witness to them, they are without excuse and they will do anything they can to continue to try to justify what is unjustifiable and that is a foolish belief in " There is no GOD". Anyone that gets in their way and ruins their chosen belief by choosing to believe in reality of the TRUTH, they will continue to mock and flounder for the opportunity to waste anyone time that will not tolerate their foolish attacks.
1 Corinthians 1:18 (Amplified Bible)
18For the story and message of the cross is sheer absurdity and folly to those who are perishing and on their way to perdition, but to us who are being saved it is the [manifestation of] the power of God.
If they are comfortable in believing there is no GOD isn't that the same freedom as those that believe in GOD? Just because many pray in public and especially at the inauguration, isn't it every American's right to pray or not to pray even if it is public or not? Since when is it PROVEN that the US Constitution was written and agreed that our Government is not allowed to acknowledge a Creator? Where in the first amendment does it have that type of restrictions these atheists are claiming? In fact why do atheist call themselves A-theists? Kind of ironic they cannot come up with their own title. How about NO-god-lers. That can explain it better wouldn't you agree?
Anyway, the Bible is 100% factually true when GOD himself calls them fools because it is PROVEN just by their actions such as these continuous waste of time lawsuits as to how foolish their ways are when the set out to do something as attack the many billions that do believe in GOD or a god. It always is a foolish act whether they like it or not to ignore the US Constitution's face value meaning that the US Constitution speaks for itself clearly and has for 200 years and there is no restriction on public prayer anywhere between the lines.
Psalm 14:1
THE [empty-headed] fool has said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable deeds; there is none that does good or right.
[And in the article below you will see just to as how foolish they become and are becoming].
We all have the freedom and free agency to to live and WE THE PEOPLE may not always agree but WE at least know that contrary to public opinion, we know what we were founded on and no one has the right to detract or add to what was already written.
LEAVE THE CONSTITUTION ALONE, IT SPEAKS LOUD AND CLEAR AND WE NEED NOTHING NEW.
1 Cor 1:30-31
30But it is from Him that you have your life in Christ Jesus, Whom God made our Wisdom from God, [revealed to us a knowledge of the divine plan of salvation previously hidden, manifesting itself as] our Righteousness [thus making us upright and putting us in right standing with God], and our Consecration [making us pure and holy], and our Redemption [providing our ransom from eternal penalty for sin].
31So then, as it is written, Let him who boasts and proudly rejoices and glories, boast and proudly rejoice and glory in the Lord.
Richard White.2009
Atheists: No praying at inauguration!
'It is a secular event of a secular country that includes all Americans'
Posted: December 30, 2008
10:06 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Atheists are planning to crash the inauguration invocation, claiming the government is choosing between "believers" and "those who don't believe" and imposing religion on atheists and agnostics.
Michael Newdow, a California attorney who pushed a case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in an unsuccessful effort to remove the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance, is joining Dan Barker, co-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, in a lawsuit to stop the Presidential Inaugural Committee's sponsorship of prayer on Jan. 20.
Their 34-page grievance, filed Monday in Washington, D.C., District Court, names Supreme Court Justice John G. Roberts Jr., officials in charge of inaugural activities, Rev. Joseph E. Lowery, pastor Rick Warren and others as defendants. It also aims to prohibit Roberts from using the phrase "So help me God" in the traditional oath of office, Fox News reports.
"We're hoping to stop prayer and religious rituals at governmental functions, especially at the inauguration," Barker said. "The inauguration is not a religious event. It is a secular event of a secular country that includes all Americans, including those of us who are not Christians, including those of us who are not believers."
Barker told Fox the government is not supposed to choose sides when it comes to religion.
It's "hard wired into our Constitution," he said, insisting that the 29 atheists and agnostics named in the lawsuit love their country.
"[W]e are subjected to someone else's religious views with the endorsement of the government, which makes us feel like second class outsiders," Barker said.
Rather than having religious figures such as Warren and Lowery delivery the invocation and benediction at his inauguration, Barker suggested Barack Obama host a private religious ceremony.
Dan Barker, co-president, Freedom From Religion Foundation (photo: FFRF)
"... Defendants will have an invocation and benediction during the inauguration," the lawsuit states. "Both of these activities are completely exclusionary, showing absolute disrespect to Plaintiffs and others of similar religious views, who explicitly reject the purely religious claims that will be endorsed, i.e., (a) there exists a God, and (b) the United States government should pay homage to that God."
"Those people who do pray do believe in God and they are in fact trying to use the government to pick sides," Barker said. "In America we are free to disagree. We can disagree with Rev. Rick Warren but we're not free to ask our government to settle the argument."
But Peter Sprigg, vice president for policy at the Family Research Council, told Fox News the decision is up to Obama, not the government.
"The atheists, while they have every right to practice their atheism, they do not have an absolute right not to be exposed to viewpoints they don't agree with," he said. "So I think this lawsuit has no merit whatsoever."
Sprigg said Barker, Newdow and other atheists involved in the lawsuit are simply confused about the Constitution's meaning. He believes the suit will fail, just as Newdow was unsuccessful in his lawsuits to ban prayer at President George W. Bush's ceremonies in 2001 and 2005.
"These atheists who are suing to prevent prayer at the inauguration are showing a fundamental misunderstanding of what the First Amendment is all about," he told Fox News Radio." The establishment of religion that is forbidden by the First Amendment means the official declaration of an official national church. It doesn't mean that public ceremonies cannot include prayers or acknowledgement of the existence of God."
However, when asked if banning prayer would mean the government is favoring atheists over believers, Barker responded, "There is a difference between neutrality and hostility."
Newdow also recently lost a defamation complaint he had filed against a pastor who criticized him for his efforts to have "under God" removed from the Pledge of Allegiance.
The case had been brought against Rev. Austin Miles.
The case previously involved WND, the Internet's leading independent news site.
But shortly after naming WND as a defendant, Newdow agreed to drop the organization from the complaint.
The case, which originated about six years ago, alleged WND published a quote from Newdow that his daughter "was forced to recite, caused her emotional damage, stress, anxiety and a sense of being left out."
The lawsuit alleged the quote was never said by Newdow.
But WND did not publish the quotation, and Newdow quickly agreed to dismiss WND as a defendant.
Monday, January 5, 2009
Happy NEW YEAR 2009
"It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God and to recognize the sublime truth announced in the Holy Scriptures and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord.
Abraham Lincoln, sixteenth President of the United States
For now at this moment another year has gone by still with same old politics, greed and those getting away with murder with diplomatic immunities installed for any elected officials who has been granted power for doing the immoral things that continues to haunt America and bring us closer for GOD to justifiably bring judgment to this ONCE great nation UNDER GOD. IT has seemed that GOD has since the last elections and all the scandals being ignored because of it and all that follow it. And now since the ending of 2008 into 2009 war has broken out for this new President Elect. As well this same President Elect has not come clean in HIS citizenship questioning and lawsuits pending against HIM. And HEY none of the AMERICAN MEDIA seems to be truly REPORTING THIS IMPORTANT NEWS AND SCANDAL and the neglect of the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION concerning this IMPORTANT ISSUE. And into this next adventure there is still a GREAT deficit, economic disaster pending, social Ism to end our Democratic Republic once and for all, more paper money making that is worth nothing, the IRS and the FED still in control, wars and rumors of war, terrorism plots, same sex tyranny enforcement by the perverted under disguise of equality, pornography, the sick practice of ABORTION, old age euthanasia, and all downright acts of immorality tolerances that many stupid Americans continue to allow even to the point of losing their freedoms so they can stay comfortable.
I am so sick and tired of dishonesty tyrannizing our country when it comes to our Government. When will people in Government ever be HELD accountable for their dishonest actions and when will the MEDIA and the free press truly REPORT the TRUTH and quit trying to CONTROL what we are supposed to know? DO YOU NOT TRULY REALIZE THAT GOD WILL REVEAL EVERY EVIL WORK EVERY TIME YOU TRY TO CONCEAL THE TRUTH?
Matthew 10:26
So have no fear of them; for nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, or kept secret that will not become known.
What part of this do they not understand? This TRUTH always comes to pass. It will be known to all every time many immoralist's try to think they can conceal the TRUTH.
And do they really think most of AMERICA is that stupid?
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right ... and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge, I mean the characters and conduct of their rulers."
John Adams, second President of the United States
SO how long are they going to continue to THINK they can do wickedly and continue to conceal it?
Isaiah 26:21
For behold, the Lord is coming out of His place [heaven] to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity; the earth also will disclose the blood shed upon her and will no longer cover her slain and conceal her guilt.
Romans 2:16
On that day when, as my Gospel proclaims, God by Jesus Christ will judge men in regard to the things which they conceal (their hidden thoughts).
And it is amazing that many cannot or will not believe this FACTUAL truth. Nothing is ever relative. GOD's WORD STANDS ALONE in SCRIPTURE ALONE whether we (mankind) like it or not.
Hebrews 4:13
And not a creature exists that is concealed from His sight, but all things are open and exposed, naked and defenseless to the eyes of Him with Whom we have to do.
IT is also very amazing these persons think they will get away with this even to the point of saying GOD does not exist as they continue to do so they can try to justify their behavior and their lifestyles of all sorts they continue to indulge in to which they have to because their wickedness in sin owns them as it did those who were BORN FROM ABOVE and given the gift of Faith in Christ alone.
John 3:3
Jesus answered him, I assure you, most solemnly I tell you, that unless a person is born again (anew, from above), he cannot ever see (know, be acquainted with, and experience) the kingdom of God.
Matthew 5:6
Blessed and fortunate and happy and spiritually prosperous (in that state in which the born-again child of God enjoys His favor and salvation) are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness (uprightness and right standing with God), for they shall be completely satisfied!
Knowing that GOD is complete control always, as to when will TRUE MORAL AMERICAN's wake up to the reality of the immorality around them that continues to PERVERT its way every minute in our daily lives and quit ignoring or tolerating the PERVERSION going on around them daily. WHAT ARE YOU TRULY AFRAID OF? Are you afraid you will lose everything like your possessions, creature comforts, etc etc if you make a stand against immorality that is ruining your comforts anyway? They already are stealing your possessions and you are just letting them. Does your lifestyle really matter to you that you would rather IGNORE and TOLERATE SIN and not be set free from just to keep what you have until death or to take them with you to your grave?
Just remember that TOMORROW IS NEVER GUARANTEED EVER. TODAY IS THE DAY OF SALVATION.
And it is time to stand gracefully but firm daily against all the perversions and those that tolerate them who continue to allow PERVERSION to run our country and the world for that matter. WILL you truly wake up READER?
PSALM 1
1[a]BLESSED (HAPPY, fortunate, prosperous, and enviable) is the man who walks and lives not in the counsel of the ungodly [following their advice, their plans and purposes], nor stands [submissive and inactive] in the path where sinners walk, nor sits down [to relax and rest] where the scornful [and the mockers] gather.
2But his delight and desire are in the law of the Lord, and on His law (the precepts, the instructions, the teachings of God) he habitually meditates (ponders and studies) by day and by night.(A)
3And he shall be like a tree firmly planted [and tended] by the streams of water, ready to bring forth its fruit in its season; its leaf also shall not fade or wither; and everything he does shall prosper [and come to maturity].(B)
4Not so the wicked [those disobedient and living without God are not so]. But they are like the chaff [worthless, dead, without substance] which the wind drives away.
5Therefore the wicked [those disobedient and living without God] shall not stand [justified] in the judgment, nor [b]sinners in the congregation of the righteous [those who are upright and in right standing with God].
6For the Lord knows and is fully acquainted with the way of the righteous, but the way of the ungodly [those living outside God's will] shall perish (end in ruin and come to nought).
Warning with love
RICHARD WHITE JAN 1 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
