"We are in danger of being overwhelmed with irredeemable paper, mere paper, representing not gold nor silver; no, Sir, representing nothing but broken promises, bad faith, bankrupt corporations, cheated creditors, and a ruined people."
Daniel Webster (1782-1852)
Ezekiel 39:21
And I will manifest My honor and glory among the nations, and all the nations shall see My judgment and justice [in the punishment] which I have executed and My hand which I have laid on them.
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
Thomas Jefferson, 1802
Fraud: Any act, expression, omission, or concealment calculated to deceive another to his or her disadvantage. (Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, 1996).
Bail outs. Bail outs.
It is very strange that the American Government wants to bail out the fallen Wall Street companies and the Governments misuse of funds etc. So we the taxpayer get to pay for their creation of all this mismanagement and shady loan deals. DID THE AVERAGE AMERICAN CITIZEN BRING US INTO ALL THIS MESS? So interesting that this has been occurring and the example of the Politicians and elected official in all offices in the American Government never listening to the people therefore proving themselves and their actions on the side with immorality and forgetfulness of the True GOD who allowed this nation to come to its life of moral freedom and moral liberty. But since "WE THE PEOPLE" do not have a say technically anymore because these elected officials think they are the Power and rule whatever way they want secretly and some outright openly in disguise of a false honesty acting like they are doing their jobs to preserve our Constitution.
So how many times do we have to warn when it consistently falls on deaf and dumb ears purposely?
If we do this horrendous bailout and some say there is no other way which I truly doubt, we will have turned over our country back to what we never wanted in the first place since the beginning of this wonderful nations birth just like a famous normal Democrat once said;
"I weep for the liberty of my country when I see at this early day of
its successful experiment that corruption has been imputed to many
members of the House of Representatives, and the rights of the people have
been bartered for promises of office. " -Andrew Jackson
and the many warning of our founders;
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right ... and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge, I mean the characters and conduct of their rulers."
John Adams, second President of the United States
"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only
sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759)
"Liberty has never lasted long in a democracy, nor has it ever ended in anything better than despotism."
Fisher Ames, Representative United States Congress (1758-1808)
"There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty."
John Adams
So where do we stand now? We have two Presidential Candidates one a barely any experienced Marxist, the other a Moderate who claims Conservative etc, a wonderful war hero and Prisoner of War who served his country by being beaten pretty badly who I respect but disagree with on all kinds of issues as well. And it is still amazing to me that OTHER POLITICAL PARTIES do not have an EQUAL RIGHT to have a platform regardless of their positions and whacked out political stances. They still have a EQUAL right to the same publicity and NO ONE WILL GIVE THEM A FAIR SHAKE. How Constitutional is this? And here we are with two candidates of two political parties that dominate and we have all the other parties who equally have a right in all the debates. WHO IS DECIDING WHO CAN RUN FOR PRESIDENT? Hmmmmmmmmm. This is not American and an abuse of power.
And here we are in a state of financial madness with Marxist solutions to bail out Wall Street? And still they will tell us we are free. We the Taxpayer will be paying our leaders Mess??
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."
Ronald Reagan, 40th President of the United States
So please reader again here is another upteenth WARNING before the dreadful thing is about to take place. We must abolish all of those financial institutions who are not Constitutionally supported and those who print money never based on our gold standard. We cannot keep PRINTING PAPER to use as currency any longer. TRUE AMERICAN"S WILL LISTEN I PRAY. Take the advice below and think on it seriously. It will preserve our ONCE American TRUE GOD FEARING WAY we once so shared. If you truly care. If you do not. You are without excuse.
Psalm 126:4
Turn to freedom our captivity and restore our fortunes, O Lord,.................
Richard White a God fearing True American.
JOIN THE NRA STUPID.
Action Alert
September 24th, 2008 by Jeff Frazee
Congress.org
Capitol Hill Switchboard: (202) 224-3121
“Dear Senator/Representative:
You MUST reject the Paulson/Bernanke plan for bailing out and propping up reckless banks at taxpayer expense. This is madness to ask us, the taxpayers, to cover the liabilities of Wall Street. We are tired of being fleeced. If you vote to support this plan, I will do everything in my power to remove you from office before you can give away any more of our money to failed businessmen.
Thank you, [Your name]”
Activist Materials:
We have developed a simple one page handout that can be distributed door-to-door or easily handed out to anyone you come across. This handout sums up the current situation, gives a four-step solution to getting our country out of this mess, and includes contact information for people to reach their representatives and senators. It’s designed to get as much information in the hands of as many people as possible as fast as possible.
Get the PDF here: Crisis on Wall Street
The key with the first handout (which we know had an awful lot of info for a one-page handout) is that it exists to get information out there - even if that means just using it as a resource for discussing the topic with other people.
PDF of succinct handout: Slim Jim
Sponsored Interviews:
Radio Interview: Dr. Bob Murphy and Dr. Mark Thornton
Archived MP3 of the interview:
http://dissentradio.com/radio/08_09_22_murphythornton.mp3
————
Radio Interview: Robert Blumen
Archived MP3 of the interview:
http://dissentradio.com/radio/08_09_23_blumen.mp3
————
Radio Interview: Peter Schiff
Archived MP3 of the interview:
http://dissentradio.com/radio/08_09_24_schiff.mp3
Share/Save/Bookmark
Posted in Action Item, Economy, Federal Reserve | Comments Off
END THE FED!
September 27th, 2008 by Don Rasmussen
If you agree, call your Congressman today…
Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act (Introduced in House)
HR 2755 IH
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2755
To abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks, to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 15, 2007
Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services
A BILL
To abolish the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks, to repeal the Federal Reserve Act, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act’.
SEC. 2. FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD ABOLISHED.
(a) In General- Effective at the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and each Federal reserve bank are hereby abolished.
(b) Repeal of Federal Reserve Act- Effective at the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Reserve Act is hereby repealed.
(c) Disposition of Affairs-
(1) MANAGEMENT DURING DISSOLUTION PERIOD- During the 1-year period referred to in subsection (a), the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System–
(A) shall, for the sole purpose of winding up the affairs of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks–
(i) manage the employees of the Board and each such bank and provide for the payment of compensation and benefits of any such employee which accrue before the position of such employee is abolished; and
(ii) manage the assets and liabilities of the Board and each such bank until such assets and liabilities are liquidated or assumed by the Secretary of the Treasury in accordance with this subsection; and
(B) may take such other action as may be necessary, subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, to wind up the affairs of the Board and the Federal reserve banks.
(2) LIQUIDATION OF ASSETS-
(A) IN GENERAL- The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall liquidate all assets of the Board and the Federal reserve banks in an orderly manner so as to achieve as expeditious a liquidation as may be practical while maximizing the return to the Treasury.
(B) TRANSFER TO TREASURY- After satisfying all claims against the Board and any Federal reserve bank which are accepted by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and redeeming the stock of such banks, the net proceeds of the liquidation under subparagraph (A) shall be transferred to the Secretary of the Treasury and deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury.
(3) ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES- All outstanding liabilities of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal reserve banks at the time such entities are abolished, including any liability for retirement and other benefits for former officers and employees of the Board or any such bank in accordance with employee retirement and benefit programs of the Board and any such bank, shall become the liability of the Secretary of the Treasury and shall be paid from amounts deposited in the general fund pursuant to paragraph (2) which are hereby appropriated for such purpose until all such liabilities are satisfied.
(d) Report- At the end of the 18-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit a joint report to the Congress containing a detailed description of the actions taken to implement this Act and any actions or issues relating to such implementation that remain uncompleted or unresolved as of the date of the report.
COPY AND SAVE
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Thursday, September 25, 2008
STATE OF CALIFORNIA APPROVES PUBLIC ORGY?????
Isa 3:9 The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide [it] not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.
Amongst all the financial woes going on in our God blessed country, and since we continue to allow covetous, lustful Perversions of all kinds to rule the airways, movies, Television, Education, and now in public street fairs and parades etc, Is it any wonder as to why we are having crises after crises of all sorts?
I am more Shocked Again and again as I stand in utter awe of the this particular immorality that is rising with the birth pangs is being aloud to the point of public sexual perversion for all to see. And these people want their right to alter nature by same sexual marriage to suit their sick selfish needs to be accepted?
Why are we not firing and impeaching our immoral leadership who continue to show they are not morally fit to lead the State as well as be representatives of a nation because of their tolerance for immoral practices. Remember there is only RIGHT or WRONG, Good or Evil and it is not personal opinion or relativism.
And I know JESUS warned us about this and Peter says "do not think it strange " but literally allowing this in the public eye as legal is such a shameful disgrace and outright abuse to the Liberty of all American's who died for this country to keep US MORALLY FREE not to be free to indulge in all kinds of perverted lusts, covetousness, and Pride. Whatever happened to natural normality as the FACTS prove?
Truly how disgusting and grotesque people have become with lack of respect for anyone but them own selves. Truly this is a HATE CRIME.
Job 8:22 They that hate Thee shall be clothed with shame; and the dwelling place of the wicked shall come to nought.
May the reader understand that we are all without excuse, their is no justification for altering nature and continuing in sin. We may have been Born into sin but Christ JESUS made a way out by taking your sin upon Himself and nailing to a Cross. SIN of all kinds only leads to death and destruction.
God can never make a mistake and you are never created as a mistake to that perverted that way ever. You are created either MALE or FEMALE that is true sexual orientation and it is to be ordained by GOD and by HIS statutes alone. If you are caught up in the same sex, transex, pornography or even normal unwed sexual orientation there is a way out of these compulsions. Seek JESUS ALONE and HE will save you and take away all those desires that owns you and is leading you down the path to destruction.
Rom 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what [is] that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
May you truly find rest for your souls in HIM alone because God is most glorified when you are most satisfied in HIM alone. HE alone only satisfies.
Richard White.
Liberty Counsel www.LC.org
September 25, 2008
California Approves Public Orgy - Folsom Street Fair is Back Again
The 25th annual homosexual "Folsom Street Fair" is being held on September 28, 2008, in San Francisco, California. This Sunday, criminal activity and sexual perversion will once again fill San Francisco's public streets, with the shameful blessing of Mayor Gavin Newsom, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
During this annual event, fully nude men walk the public streets engaging some of the vilest acts in broad daylight. Some parents even bring their children! The police simply stand by and watch the illegal behavior. In fact, the San Francisco Police Department will again have a booth at this despicable event.
Liberty Counsel has released a statement calling for the enforcement of the state's decency laws. History has shown that California is a very influential state. If this illegal activity is not stopped, this debauchery may soon come to a town near you. People across this great nation should demand that all decency laws be enforced in California and that violators be prosecuted.
Mayor Newsom, Speaker Pelosi and Gov. Schwarzenegger know about the Folsom Street Fair, but will not try to stop the illegal activity. Even if you are not a California resident, these leaders need to hear from you.
Mayor Gavin Newsom of San Francisco:
Telephone: (415) 554-6141
Fax: (415) 554-6160
Email: gavin.newsom@sfgov.org
Comment page: http://www.sfgov.org/site/mayor_index.asp?id=22018
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco:
Telephone: (202) 225-0100
Comment page: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger:
Telephone: (916) 445-2841
Fax: (916) 558-3160
Comment page: http://gov.ca.gov/interact#contact
And if you want to give by Faith to Liberty counsel because they do work very hard and need support if you can afford to and GOD asks you too.
Mathew D. Staver - Founder and Chairman
Anita L. Staver - President
Liberty Counsel - 1-800-671-1776
PO Box 540774 - Orlando, FL 32854
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Liberal Democrats speaking out against the perversion of Same sex marriage
Proverbs 3:32
For the perverse are an abomination [extremely disgusting and detestable] to the Lord; but His confidential communion and secret counsel are with the [uncompromisingly] righteous (those who are upright and in right standing with Him).
COMMENTARY (with story below)
Deuteronomy 32:20
And He said, I will hide My face from them, I will see what their end will be; for they are a perverse generation, children in whom is no faithfulness
This whole same sex marriage perversion continues still to baffle me as to how much of an effort these perverts are going to, to FORCE unnaturalness so desperately they are even using commercials with a man and a woman, some with somebody's male and female parents, (what else will they use) calling Natural Normal persons HATE criminals if they vote against Proposition 8 in California or whatever Proposition is in your State. Oh how these perverts want America to be so European in their acceptance of perverse lifestyles. You who stand against the IMMORAL LIE of Same sex Marriage are considered a hate criminal? There is no such thing. IT IS NOT HATE TO STAND AGAINST SEXUAL PERVERSION. Homosexuality is not a RACE but a PERVERSION. IT is hate to FORCE perversion on MORAL persons who LOVE to be obedient to GOD's Statutes.
Some would even consider my choice words very hateful but as I have written before it is only WARNING, Perversion is perversion, why try to hide the truth by calling it a made up word like "Homosexual" etc etc. Society even understands it is SAME SEX that WILL NEVER reproduce ever. That is why only MALE and FEMALE have the only GIFT of marriage because MALE and FEMALE marriage is not PERVERSION. SAME SEX sexual relationships is Perversion plain and simple and those who choose this lost lifestyle have to face the music NOW so they still have a chance to be saved because Life is but a vapor and if they die in their sins without turning to the most satisfying SAVIOR in the universe, JESUS who will Judge ALL, oh what a tragedy this will be which I wish on no human ever.
Nothing ever can compare so tragic as this coming reality for those who reject GOD and HIS statutes which are loving given to all mankind with common grace. Just imagine falling into a Righteous angry God's justice when you had so many times to turn to HIM. You can't and I pray you won't ever when HE calls your name when it is your time to depart. Even To you who are lost in bondage to perversion GOD can set you free and then you will see who HE truly made you to be. A Male for HIM or a female for HIM. BE one with HIM now HIS way. HE alone only satisfies. HIS name is JESUS, King of all KINGS.
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord does not delay and is not tardy or slow about what He promises, according to some people's conception of slowness, but He is long-suffering (extraordinarily patient) toward you, not desiring that any should perish, but that all should turn to repentance.
Richard White Sept 24 2008 (C)
Protecting marriage to protect children
Marriage as a human institution is constantly evolving. But in all societies, marriage shapes the rights and obligations of parenthood.
By David Blankenhorn
September 19, 2008 LA TIMES
I'm a liberal Democrat. And I do not favor same-sex marriage. Do those positions sound contradictory? To me, they fit together.
Many seem to believe that marriage is simply a private love relationship between two people. They accept this view, in part, because Americans have increasingly emphasized and come to value the intimate, emotional side of marriage, and in part because almost all opinion leaders today, from journalists to judges, strongly embrace this position. That's certainly the idea that underpinned the California Supreme Court's legalization of same-sex marriage.
But I spent a year studying the history and anthropology of marriage, and I've come to a different conclusion.
Marriage as a human institution is constantly evolving, and many of its features vary across groups and cultures. But there is one constant. In all societies, marriage shapes the rights and obligations of parenthood. Among us humans, the scholars report, marriage is not primarily a license to have sex. Nor is it primarily a license to receive benefits or social recognition. It is primarily a license to have children.
In this sense, marriage is a gift that society bestows on its next generation. Marriage (and only marriage) unites the three core dimensions of parenthood -- biological, social and legal -- into one pro-child form: the married couple. Marriage says to a child: The man and the woman whose sexual union made you will also be there to love and raise you. Marriage says to society as a whole: For every child born, there is a recognized mother and a father, accountable to the child and to each other.
These days, because of the gay marriage debate, one can be sent to bed without supper for saying such things. But until very recently, almost no one denied this core fact about marriage. Summing up the cross-cultural evidence, the anthropologist Helen Fisher in 1992 put it simply: "People wed primarily to reproduce." The philosopher and Nobel laureate Bertrand Russell, certainly no friend of conventional sexual morality, was only repeating the obvious a few decades earlier when he concluded that "it is through children alone that sexual relations become important to society, and worthy to be taken cognizance of by a legal institution."
Marriage is society's most pro-child institution. In 2002 -- just moments before it became highly unfashionable to say so -- a team of researchers from Child Trends, a nonpartisan research center, reported that "family structure clearly matters for children, and the family structure that helps children the most is a family headed by two biological parents in a low-conflict marriage."
All our scholarly instruments seem to agree: For healthy development, what a child needs more than anything else is the mother and father who together made the child, who love the child and love each other.
For these reasons, children have the right, insofar as society can make it possible, to know and to be cared for by the two parents who brought them into this world. The foundational human rights document in the world today regarding children, the 1989 U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, specifically guarantees children this right. The last time I checked, liberals like me were supposed to be in favor of internationally recognized human rights, particularly concerning children, who are typically society's most voiceless and vulnerable group. Or have I now said something I shouldn't?
Every child being raised by gay or lesbian couples will be denied his birthright to both parents who made him. Every single one. Moreover, losing that right will not be a consequence of something that at least most of us view as tragic, such as a marriage that didn't last, or an unexpected pregnancy where the father-to-be has no intention of sticking around. On the contrary, in the case of same-sex marriage and the children of those unions, it will be explained to everyone, including the children, that something wonderful has happened!
For me, what we are encouraged or permitted to say, or not say, to one another about what our society owes its children is crucially important in the debate over initiatives like California's Proposition 8, which would reinstate marriage's customary man-woman form. Do you think that every child deserves his mother and father, with adoption available for those children whose natural parents cannot care for them? Do you suspect that fathers and mothers are different from one another? Do you imagine that biological ties matter to children? How many parents per child is best? Do you think that "two" is a better answer than one, three, four or whatever? If you do, be careful. In making the case for same-sex marriage, more than a few grown-ups will be quite willing to question your integrity and goodwill. Children, of course, are rarely consulted.
The liberal philosopher Isaiah Berlin famously argued that, in many cases, the real conflict we face is not good versus bad but good versus good. Reducing homophobia is good. Protecting the birthright of the child is good. How should we reason together as a society when these two good things conflict?
Here is my reasoning. I reject homophobia and believe in the equal dignity of gay and lesbian love. Because I also believe with all my heart in the right of the child to the mother and father who made her, I believe that we as a society should seek to maintain and to strengthen the only human institution -- marriage -- that is specifically intended to safeguard that right and make it real for our children.
Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. But changing the meaning of marriage to accommodate homosexual orientation further and perhaps definitively undermines for all of us the very thing -- the gift, the birthright -- that is marriage's most distinctive contribution to human society. That's a change that, in the final analysis, I cannot support.
(David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage.")
"Strive to penetrate to the bottom of the Divine Truths, and NEVER BE CONTENT with a SUPERFICIAL knowledge". David Brainerd
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)