Thursday, December 4, 2008

More anti-Americans plots to destroy the US Constitution exposed showing that LIBERALISM is a MENTAL DISORDER


Here I am again being a bringer of bad news and disturbances that seem to continue to expose itself but I also continue to provide the remedy always for the wandering wondering reader. His name is JESUS and HE truly is the KING of KING ruling now. He is is just cleaning up and setting apart the sheep from the goats in HIS Church Body now and continues to expose the reality to the sins the world continues to commit against HIM even though HE took away the sins of the world for those who trust in HIM alone.
And if you do not know HIM or HE is not in you now, Today is the day of salvation for you NOW to call upon HIS name and repent for your sins against him. HE is ready to transform your life if you are willing.

As to the article below read and see the reality that WE THE PEOPLE are allowing too many other Americans with immoral mental disorders and other foreign born entities with the same sickness to change what our naturally borne citizens have fought for, for 200 or so years to preserve our US Constitution and our National Sovereignty Under GOD. This document is alive today as it was then and there are those political terrorist trying to continue to ruin this morally wonderfully fair and balanced document since day one.
It speaks for itself that is why it will always work and has no need to be changed is under attack by the foolish who want to scrap it so they can allow immoral agendas to be guilt free and overtake such a blessed country we so used to be. Why oh foolish America do you want your nation to be not free and want to CHANGE what has no need for CHANGE. TRUE CHANGE IS SURRENDERING TO JESUS AND BEING TRANSFORMED BY HIM ALONE. Nothing else will ever compare.

'Natural-born' requirement called 'stupidest provision'

Also 'discriminates, outdated, undemocratic and assumes birthplace a proxy for loyalty'
Posted: December 03, 2008
9:00 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

An associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then-Sen. Barack Obama has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.
Barack Obama and Raila Odinga
Barack Obama and Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga

The paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy is listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis. A partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cites his membership on the finance committees for both Obama and Sen. Richard Durbin on the corporate website.

The article by Herlihy is available online under law review articles from Kent University.

The issue is the subject of nearly two dozen court cases in recent weeks, including at least two that have gone to the U.S. Supreme Court.

There have been accusations that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as his campaign has stated. His paternal grandmother has stated she was in attendance at his birth in Mombasa. While Hawaii officials say they have seen his birth certificate, they have declined to release information from it.

Join more than 150,000 others in signing WND's online petition calling for release of Barack Obama's birth certificate and verifying beyond any shadow of a doubt his constitutional eligibility for office. This offer ends Thursday at noon Eastern Time to ensure all letters are delivered by Friday morning to the Supreme Court.

The Certification of Live Birth from Hawaii that the Obama campaign posted on the Internet isn't considered by critics to resolve the issue, since during the 1960s when Obama was born, the new state issued the document to infants not necessarily born in Hawaii.

There also remain unanswered questions about his youth, when he lived and attended school in Indonesia and later when he traveled to Pakistan. The questions include whether he gave up a U.S. citizenship to attend school or traveled on another nation's passport to Pakistan at a time when U.S. passports were unwelcome there.

Answers to those issues could determine whether Obama meets the Constitution's demand for a "natural-born" citizen.

Herlihy's published paper reveals that the requirement likely was considered in a negative light by organizations linked to Obama in the months before he announced in 2007 his candidacy for the presidency.

"The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the 'stupidest provision' in the Constitution, "undecidedly un-American," "blatantly discriminatory," and the "Constitution's worst provision," Herlihy begins in her introduction to the paper titled, "Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle."

She concludes that the "emotional" reasons to oppose changing the Constitution will prevail over the "rational" reasons demanding a change.

"The current American perceptions about the effects of globalization and the misunderstanding about what globalization actually is will result in Americans deciding that naturalized citizens should not be president because this would, in effect, be promoting globalization, Herlihy wrote.

"Although this argument is admittedly circular, because globalization is the thing that makes the need to abolish the requirement more and more persuasive, Americans' subsequent perceptions about globalization are the very things that will prevent Americans from embracing the idea of eliminating the natural born requirement.

"Logical Americans are looking for a reason to ignore the rational reasons promoted by globalization so that they may vote based on their own emotions and instincts," she wrote.

Read all the evidence about Obama's birthplace in Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation."

She blamed support for the constitutional provision on "fear, racism, religious intolerance, or blind faith in the decisions of the Founding Fathers."

WND called Herlihy's number listed on the law firm website, and a woman answered with, "Sarah Herlihy." But when WND identified itself as a news agency, the woman said she didn't think "Sarah Herlihy" was in, but would take a message. There was no return call.

In the body of her argument, Herlihy said the constitutional provision simply is outdated.

"Considering that the Founding Fathers presumably included the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution partly out of fear of foreign subversion, the current stability of the American government and the intense media scrutiny of presidential candidates virtually eliminates the possibility of a 'foreigner' coming to America, becoming a naturalized citizen, generating enough public support to become president, and somehow using the presidency to directly benefit his homeland," she wrote.

"The natural born citizen clause of the United States Constitution should be repealed for numerous reasons. Limiting presidential eligibility to natural born citizens discriminates against naturalized citizens, is outdated and undemocratic, and incorrectly assumes that birthplace is a proxy for loyalty," she wrote.

Many of the reasons for keeping the limit, she wrote, "are based primarily on emotion."

A web blogger suggested, "So it sure looks like Obama's people have looked into the matter of 'natural born' as far back as early 2006. What is even more disturbing is that it would appear that they are following the thought of : 'If the facts do not support the theory, Destroy the facts!"


And if you will here stop and ask yourselves why you are not as Pious as the primitive Christians were, your own heart will tell you, that it is neither through Ignorance nor inability, but purely because you never thoroughly intended it.....(William Law)

Wednesday, December 3, 2008


So reader will you now understand that there is an agenda truly going on in the WORLD and that National Sovereignity is under attack and has been since 1913 in America and then the whole world?? You are the target for tyranny. Surrender to JESUS today and be ruled by the only KING of KINGS where you will have complete freedom of speech and of sound mind. Best of all you will never be in bondage again to sin forever and your mental disability from sin will be no more. [ED note]

Brasscheck TV

I am speechless.

Who's in charge?

I was under the impression that Canada and Australia were sovereign countries.

I guess not.

This video shows the heads of both these states reading the same exact statement - word for word - supporting the invasion of Iraq.

Who wrote this thing?

Who distributed it?

Who compelled these obvious puppets to read it?

The Queen? (The UN?) The CIA? (NWO?) Who runs these people.

Note: Canada's Harper was not yet Prime Minister when he made this speech selling out his country for god knows who - but he is now.