COMMENTARY: Continuous reporting by those who want a FREE PRESS including LRR of what the immoral MEDIA moguls do not want to to see which is the TRUTH and FACTS. Aren't you sick and tired of Corporate owned and Government controlled media networks deliberate LIES? DID YOU KNOW THAT HAMAS AND EVERY OTHER RADICAL NOMAD ARAB JIHAD GROUPS KICKED OUT OF ARABIA (especially those that claim they are Palestinians which ONLY JEWS ARE ALONE THE NICKNAMED PALESTINAINS BY THE ROMANS GET IT?) have been randomly firing Rockets into Israel for eight years? And it took eight years for Israel to actually go to this extreme to go after those responsible for these stupidly unnecessary WMD attacks? After all when the rejected refugee Arabs decided to settle in Israel, DID NOT ISRAEL HELP THEM AND GIVE THEM COMMUNITIES, GAVE THEM FUNDS TO BUILD UP THEIR HOMES AND BUSINESSES ETC ETC. There is even a Cabinet and political party of ARABS in the Knesset isn't there? WHY is this not NEWS?
Please American if we can all go after the MEDIA and hold them accountable by taking them to court and really giving the PUBIC EYE what every American as well as every other FREE MORAL MINDED citizens of the World deserves is the TRUTH and FACTS from the MEDIA'S ill repute and reporting what their agendas hold only, then we will cipher through all other forms of poopaganda they continue to shove down our throats. They will be held accountable and they know it. BUT IT IS UP TO YOUR TO FIGHT WITH THE REST OF THE FREE AGENCY MINDED FOLKS WHO CARE. Or do you not care?
Here you can see the big picture of the major News Media, I don't need to elaborate the pictures tell it all.
Shalom, jerry golden
THESE ARE THE IMAGES THEY SHOW:
THESE ARE THE IMAGES THEY DO NOT EVER SHOW.
So tell me why does not anyone report about the eight years that Israel held off from any real retaliation from the rockets that continued to hit israel ever since. And why does the MEDIA, UN, US, Europe, etc etc continue to call the ARAB REFUGEES Palestinian
When that was THE GIVEN NAME the ROMANS 2000 or more years ago gave to the JEWS? Tell why when Israel became a nation in 1948 that the British as well recognized the same ROMAN name that the JEWS were the true Palestinians. DO YOU SEE HOW TRUTH GETS DISTORTED BY THE PURPOSELY UNINFORMED? What about how the real Palestinians THE JEWS instead of further rejecting the ARAB refugees, they actually built towns and communities, funding them, tolerating their MUSLIM lies and beliefs even to the point of not dismantling the DOME of the ROCK MOON GOD temple and allowing them to worship freely which goes against GOD's very Torah? (SEE commandments 1-4).
Still Israel the nation has compassion for the arab refugees and they have a right to retaliate against the dogs that bite the hand that feeds. Pray fro peace in Israel not a Palestinian state for the Palestinians THE JEWS already have a NATION. Pray that the ARAB refugee communities realize once an for all that ISRAEL is deserving nation alone and if they want to be part of ISRAEL just abide in the LAND as Israel requires. IT is not forced occupation as the LIE continues. Peace can only be achieved if the TRUTH MATTERS.
Friday, January 9, 2009
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Already and 2009 just begun? Of course. You see this is what happens when stupid people do not care about there freedom or their country.
Posted by Richard W. at 4:25 PM
Like weeds destroying a good crop so is the average American being fed UN-nutritional (literally) fertilizers from tyrannical foreign sources that want to denationalize the second best nation the world has ever seen and witnessed these last 200 years. America may be a beast as some say but WE THE PEOPLE can still fight daily for moral freedom daily if you choose to WAKE UP AMERICAN. Why is it so hard for any to believe that many want America to join the rest of the tyrannical world? Do they really want their freedom taken away that BAD subconsciously? Will you heed the warnings finally American?
America's identity crisis
Posted: January 07, 2009
1:00 am Eastern
Can you name the three branches of American government – legislative, executive and judicial? If so, you are among the one-half of Americans who know this very basic fact about the U.S. government and Constitution.
The Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI), which earlier has conducted in-depth studies of what American college students know, and don't know, about civics, now reports equally depressing facts about grown-ups. It appears that adults, too, lack the civic knowledge they need to be informed citizens and intelligent voters.
ISI administered a very basic test on American history, government and economics to 2,500 Americans age 25 and older. The multiple-choice test asked citizens to identify terms that everybody should know, such as the New Deal, the Electoral College, Sputnik, "I Have a Dream" and progressive tax.
The 2,500 adults scored an average of 49 percent – that means they get a pitiful F. Those who had received a bachelor's degree averaged 57 percent on the test, compared to 44 percent for those with only a high school diploma. Worse still, 164 adults who had held elected office also scored an average of 44 percent.
Almost 40 percent of respondents said they thought the president (rather than Congress) has the power to declare war. Only 50 percent knew that Congress shares authority with the president over U.S. foreign policy. And almost one in four thought Congress shares authority over U.S. foreign policy with the United Nations.
(Column continues below)
Americans who lack knowledge of our country's history, Constitution and institutions really have no frame of reference to judge current politics and policies. Federal law requires public schools to teach about the U.S. Constitution on Constitution Day, Sept. 17, but it looks like American adults need those lessons, too.
The 2006 National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) Civics Test revealed that the majority of eighth-graders could not explain the purpose of the Declaration of Independence. No wonder young voters are not shocked at those who talk about "interdependence," globalism and becoming "citizens of the world."
It's not just that American citizens lack knowledge of historical and constitutional facts about our country, but they also show a declining appreciation of who we are. A survey by Harris Interactive reported that 84 percent of respondents believe we have a unique American identity, but 64 percent believe this identity is weakening, and 24 percent believe we are already so divided that a common national identity is impossible.
Political correctness in colleges and public schools over the last decade has gone a long way toward replacing patriotism with the trendy dicta of multiculturalism, diversity and global citizenship. Are we losing our identity as Americans?
To address this question, the Bradley Foundation has started a national conversation on America's National Identity called "E Pluribus Unum." The question is: Is America still "from many, one" ("indivisible," as our Pledge of Allegiance affirms), or are we fast becoming "from one, many"?
A review of history textbooks used in public schools today reveals a big source of the problem. Textbooks now emphasize America's faults and mistakes rather than our incredible achievements.
History textbooks should tell the exciting story that the United States has produced nearly all the world's greatest inventions and that these inventions have produced living standards that are the envy of the world. This exciting narrative is not based on Americans being smarter than other nationalities, or our having more natural resources than other countries, but on the wisdom of the Founding Fathers, who gave us the superior political and economic system enshrined in our Constitution.
We should celebrate and honor our nation's heroes, starting with George Washington. Federal law clearly specifies that the name of the "legal public holiday" on the third Monday in February is "Washington's Birthday."
Americans should refuse to buy the calendars that wrongly label this February holiday as "Presidents Day." This calendar mischief is very offensive because there are quite a few presidents who are not worthy of a special "day."
Maintaining our national identity depends on keeping our Constitution safe from the supremacist judges who want to change it to comport with what they call "emerging standards." Our national identity depends on keeping English as our official, national language so we don't suffer the conflicts endured by nations with competing languages.
America was founded by men who shared a common inheritance in the British rule of law developed over centuries (beginning with the Magna Carta), the Christian religion and the English language. They also shared the belief later expressed by Alexis de Tocqueville that America is "quite exceptional" and by Ronald Reagan that America is "the shining city on the hill."
Posted by Richard W. at 4:00 PM
The Gospel in 6 Minutes
By John Piper September 12, 2007
What's the Gospel?
1. What’s the gospel? I’ll put it in a sentence.
The Gospel is the news that Jesus Christ, the Righteous One, died for our sins and rose again, eternally triumphant over all his enemies, so that there is now no condemnation for those who believe, but only everlasting joy.
That’s the gospel.
2. You Can't Outgrow the Gospel
You never, never, never outgrow your need for it. Don’t ever think of the gospel as, “That’s the way you get saved, and then you get strong by leaving it and doing something else.”
No! We are strengthened by God through the gospel every day, till the day we drop.
You never outgrow the need to preach to yourself the gospel.
3.How the Gospel Strengthens
Here’s an illustration, and I use it not because it’s any big deal to speak from my life, but because it’s what I walked through and where I most pointedly in the last year experienced the power of the gospel to make me strong. (Many of you are walking through things much heavier than prostate cancer—much heavier.)
Do you remember the verses that I shared with you back in February that were almighty for me? It was that moment right after the doctor says, “I think we need to do a biopsy,” when this stab of fear comes. It didn’t last long, mercifully.
And then came—what? 1Thessalonians 5:9-10. It’s just as pure gospel as you can get.
God has not destined you for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ,who died for you so that whether you wake or sleep you will live with him.
Settled. Peace like a river.
4.The Gospel Is Perfect for Your Needs
That’s just gospel—perfectly timed, perfectly applied, perfectly suited to my need. That’s why the Bible is so thick—because there are so many different needs that you have. And there are suitable places where the gospel is unfolded for you, so that if you immerse yourself in the whole book, always with an eye for what Christ has wrought for you and purchased for you in this thick, glorious history of God’s interaction with people, he will give you what you need.
Therefore, everything in me says, and I hope to say until the day I die, “Now, to him who is able to strengthen me, according to Paul’s gospel, to him—to that God—be glory forever and ever.”
God came into history in Jesus Christ; he died in order to destroy the power of hell and death and Satan and sin; and he did it through the gospel of Jesus Christ.
5. A Plea to Believe
I know that there are people reading this who are not trusting Jesus Christ, and therefore can only expect condemnation. So I’m just going to plead with you here at the end, lay down that rebellion. Lay it down. And simply embrace the gospel that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Righteous One, died for your sins. He was raised on the third day, triumphant over all his enemies. He reigns until he puts all of his enemies under his feet. Forgiveness of sins and a right standing with God comes freely through him alone, by faith alone.
I plead with you, don’t try to be strong in your own strength; it will not be there when you need it. Only one strength will be there—the strength that God gives according to the gospel.
Don’t put it off.
Posted by Richard W. at 2:57 PM
American Corporate Media should be sued for adding and detracting from the FIRST Amendment and totally misinterpreting the US Constitution.
[COMMENTARY]When is media ever fair and balanced?
How disgusting it is to have soft porn, questionable blasphemies, antichrist sitcoms, indulgent commercials, Perverted opposite and same sex promotions and voyeurism, Evolutionary pseudoscience fiction documentaries that embarrass true science facts, ultra mega violence, coward violence and whatever else that is immoral not mentioned. And to top it off with the worst of all, a free press that truly is not free and owned by private moguls with agendas running wild to prevent Americans for learning real truth and or ordered by dark shadows behind the scenes who are addicted to SELFish power mad with destruction it seems.
Let me explain what a FREE PRESS really is.
A FREE PRESS reports the hard truth regardless of personal opinion and stays with True facts that speak for itself contrary to public opinion or personal. A FREE PRESS does not hide secrets or have a personal agenda but only to keep all truth out in the open in the public eye at all costs. A FREE PRESS is not money mammon hungry or answers to the wealthy hordes personal agendas to keep things under raps so to speak. A FREE PRESS DOES NOT TAKE BRIBES AT ANY TIME. A FREE PRESS REALIZES THAT TOMORROW IS NEVER GUARANTEED. SO A FREE PRESS reports all truth at all times ever exposing the immorality so a society will remain free morally so it can stay FREE GET IT?
This is truly one of the major things our GOD Blessed Country was founded on and truly was meant for all to stay transparent so our society can remain FREE. But it is not the case at all isn't it. Our next President proclaimed many times that HE would be transparent and be held accountable. Well of course thus far he has shown that not to be true and he is not even in office yet. But it figures and of course we expected that right. Of course. But do not anyone care if our Constitution is a stake and if that goes or they try to reform it truly there will be no more GOD bless America and your lively hood will now be in check of the cowardly indulgent rulers who rule hanging mammon over our heads in high places just as history continues to prove to mankind over and over and mankind continues to be a dog returning to his vomit.
Will you continue to be a Self indulgent coward tolerating immorality too American being part of the problem or will you take your place with WE THE PEOPLE and continue to steer our Country in the ways of GOD?
I know times have majorly changed etc with all the wars, industrial, technology, all revolutions of industry, manufactured fit homes etc , huge progress, knowledge increased according to the Book of Daniel etc etc, in this the fast distracted age But the 200 year old Constitution still speaks loud and clear and should be NEVER tampered alter detracted or added onto unless it agrees with moral Constitutional rights that our Fore Fathers passed to down to all of US to keep these truths and hold them for dear life so our FREE SOCIETY will never be ruled by a immoral majority which would destroy our foundation and resurrect tyranny to which this country and WE THE PEOPLE was to never allow. EVER!
SO what is truly next AMERICAN? To reform America again and go back to ORIGINAL INTENT or allow Tyranny as cowards would I say again? You decide. I will continue to fight and end cowardliness on my part. Will you with me or will you allow your freedom to be stripped from you, line by line, here is a little there is a little?
Richard White TRUE MORAL AMERICAN AGAIN in JAN 2009
WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL
TV networks: Don't raise eligibility questions
Fox, CNN, MSNBC all refuse permission for advertising time
Posted: January 08, 2009
12:14 am Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Barack Obama's campaign officials and transition office repeatedly have rejected reporters' requests for comment on questions raised over his lack of documentation regarding his birth and the resulting concerns over his eligibility to be president. Now a number of media organizations apparently don't want questions raised either.
WND columnist Janet Porter told WND she found that out when her organization, Faith2Action.org, tried to purchase airtime to publicize information about the eligibility concerns.
She told WND that national networks that refused to sell her time for a 60-second commercial included CNBC, MSNBC, Headline News, CNN and Fox. Washington, D.C., outlets for the same organizations did the same.
"With the date for congressional approval (of the Electoral College today), we wanted them to have access to the facts," she told WND. "Congress is sworn to uphold the Constitution."
She said the donors who contributed the funding that was to be used for the ads were being contacted to find out whether they wanted to reach another direction in the media.
The ad to be broadcast already is available on YouTube, and also is embedded here:
"Heard rumors about Barack Obama's citizenship? These are the facts," the ad states.
It cites a statement from the president-elect's paternal grandmother that she was present at his birth in Kenya, his refusal to release his original birth certificate, his attendance at school in Indonesia "as Barry Soetoro when only Indonesia citizens were permitted to attend," and Obama's travel to Pakistan in 1981 "when it was illegal to enter as a U.S. citizen."
Join the campaign to urge the Supreme Court to take the eligibility question seriously by FedExing the justices.
It concludes, "Our Constitution still matters."
"As requested, we backed up every sentence of this ad, and still it was rejected," Porter said. "What does that say about freedom of speech when we not only cannot count on the media to cover the story, but we can't even buy time to publicize what may be the biggest story of the century."
She raised several questions about the issue in her recent column.
"What if an impostor from another country ran for the presidency and won?" she asks. "What if the media blocked any news of his birthplace and citizenship? What if the media censorship even blocked paid advertising which tried to expose it?
"What if no one had the courage to challenge or verify it? What if he was inaugurated illegally? What if the military had to answer to a commander in chief who was illegitimate? What if every law he signed was invalid?"
And, she wonders, "What if it all happened on our watch?"
WND reported the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled Friday a conference – a private meeting at which justices consider whether to take individual cases – on a lawsuit challenging Obama's eligibility.
Twice before the justices have heard the questions, and twice before they've decided to ignore them.
The lingering questions continue to leave a cloud over the impending presidency of a man whose relatives have reported he was born in Kenya and who has decided, for whatever reason, not to release a bona fide copy of his original birth certificate in its complete form.
Multiple lawsuits have been filed around the nation alleging Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Some of the legal challenges have alleged Obama was not born in Hawaii, as he insists, but in Kenya. The woman identified by Obama as his American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time – especially if it took place in a foreign country and the man identified as his father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Kenyan citizen.
Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 200,000 others and sign the petition demanding proof of eligibility now!
Other challenges also have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. Such cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.
Several details of Obama's past have added twists to the question of his eligibility and citizenship, including his family's move to Indonesia when he was a child, his travel to Pakistan in the '80s when such travel was forbidden to American citizens and conflicting reports from Obama's family about his place of birth.
On Friday the justices will consider Philip J. Berg's Petition for Writ of Certiorari.
"This is a historic occasion that will impact the office of the president of the United States as never before. No one has ever brought an action against a president-elect candidate challenging his eligibility to serve based on the 'natural born' citizen requirement provided in the United States Constitution, Article II Section 1," said a statement on Berg's ObamaCrimes.com website.
Berg suggested if Obama "is allowed to be sworn in as president of the United States, there will be substantial and irrevocable harm to the stability of the United States of America and to its citizens."
"Because Barack Obama is not a 'natural born' citizen as required by the United States Constitution, then all of his actions as president would be null and void," Berg said.
Last month, WND reported similar concerns raised in a lawsuit filed in California.
"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void," argues a case brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes, also a presidential candidate. "Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal."
Berg, who has another case on the issue pending on behalf of a retired military officer, earlier stated, "I am determined, on behalf of the 320 million citizens in the United States, to see that 'our U.S. Constitution' is followed. Specifically, in the case of Soetoro a/k/a Obama, does he meet the constitutional qualifications for president?
"I am appalled that the mainstream media continue to ignore this issue as we are headed to a 'constitutional crisis.' There is nothing more important than our U.S. Constitution and it must be enforced," he said.
The Supreme Court also has another hearing on an issue raised by Berg for Jan. 16, and the Supreme Court just confirmed today yet another conference is scheduled Jan. 23 on a separate case, this one handled by California attorney Orly Taitz, challenging Obama's eligibility.
Because of the high stakes, WND earlier launched a letter campaign to contact Electoral College members and urge them to review the controversy.
That followed a campaign that sent more than 60,000 letters by overnight delivery to the U.S. Supreme Court when one case contesting Obama's eligibility for the Oval Office was pending.
A separate petition, already signed by more than 200,000 also is ongoing asking authorities in the election to seek proof Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution.
WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi went to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama's birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.
The biggest question was why, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn't simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors
The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?
Posted by Richard W. at 12:14 AM
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
The wicked one in the pride of his countenance will not seek, inquire for, and yearn for God; all his thoughts are that there is no God.
COMMENTARY (See article below)
I always wonder as to why those that do not believe in GOD do not seem comfortable in believing that they do not believe in GOD. Take for instance those challenging with lawsuits about the next Presidential inauguration (article below). Why is it they have to waste everyone else time and tax payer money to persuade that public prayer or a moment of silence if that is also what one chooses, is not a right or is unconstitutional etc for anyone who firmly believe in GOD? Why does it bother them that much to go to extremes? Answer: Because they truly know they are filthy sinners internally inside, their consciences do bear witness to them, they are without excuse and they will do anything they can to continue to try to justify what is unjustifiable and that is a foolish belief in " There is no GOD". Anyone that gets in their way and ruins their chosen belief by choosing to believe in reality of the TRUTH, they will continue to mock and flounder for the opportunity to waste anyone time that will not tolerate their foolish attacks.
1 Corinthians 1:18 (Amplified Bible)
18For the story and message of the cross is sheer absurdity and folly to those who are perishing and on their way to perdition, but to us who are being saved it is the [manifestation of] the power of God.
If they are comfortable in believing there is no GOD isn't that the same freedom as those that believe in GOD? Just because many pray in public and especially at the inauguration, isn't it every American's right to pray or not to pray even if it is public or not? Since when is it PROVEN that the US Constitution was written and agreed that our Government is not allowed to acknowledge a Creator? Where in the first amendment does it have that type of restrictions these atheists are claiming? In fact why do atheist call themselves A-theists? Kind of ironic they cannot come up with their own title. How about NO-god-lers. That can explain it better wouldn't you agree?
Anyway, the Bible is 100% factually true when GOD himself calls them fools because it is PROVEN just by their actions such as these continuous waste of time lawsuits as to how foolish their ways are when the set out to do something as attack the many billions that do believe in GOD or a god. It always is a foolish act whether they like it or not to ignore the US Constitution's face value meaning that the US Constitution speaks for itself clearly and has for 200 years and there is no restriction on public prayer anywhere between the lines.
THE [empty-headed] fool has said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable deeds; there is none that does good or right.
[And in the article below you will see just to as how foolish they become and are becoming].
We all have the freedom and free agency to to live and WE THE PEOPLE may not always agree but WE at least know that contrary to public opinion, we know what we were founded on and no one has the right to detract or add to what was already written.
LEAVE THE CONSTITUTION ALONE, IT SPEAKS LOUD AND CLEAR AND WE NEED NOTHING NEW.
1 Cor 1:30-31
30But it is from Him that you have your life in Christ Jesus, Whom God made our Wisdom from God, [revealed to us a knowledge of the divine plan of salvation previously hidden, manifesting itself as] our Righteousness [thus making us upright and putting us in right standing with God], and our Consecration [making us pure and holy], and our Redemption [providing our ransom from eternal penalty for sin].
31So then, as it is written, Let him who boasts and proudly rejoices and glories, boast and proudly rejoice and glory in the Lord.
Atheists: No praying at inauguration!
'It is a secular event of a secular country that includes all Americans'
Posted: December 30, 2008
10:06 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Atheists are planning to crash the inauguration invocation, claiming the government is choosing between "believers" and "those who don't believe" and imposing religion on atheists and agnostics.
Michael Newdow, a California attorney who pushed a case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in an unsuccessful effort to remove the words "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance, is joining Dan Barker, co-president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, in a lawsuit to stop the Presidential Inaugural Committee's sponsorship of prayer on Jan. 20.
Their 34-page grievance, filed Monday in Washington, D.C., District Court, names Supreme Court Justice John G. Roberts Jr., officials in charge of inaugural activities, Rev. Joseph E. Lowery, pastor Rick Warren and others as defendants. It also aims to prohibit Roberts from using the phrase "So help me God" in the traditional oath of office, Fox News reports.
"We're hoping to stop prayer and religious rituals at governmental functions, especially at the inauguration," Barker said. "The inauguration is not a religious event. It is a secular event of a secular country that includes all Americans, including those of us who are not Christians, including those of us who are not believers."
Barker told Fox the government is not supposed to choose sides when it comes to religion.
It's "hard wired into our Constitution," he said, insisting that the 29 atheists and agnostics named in the lawsuit love their country.
"[W]e are subjected to someone else's religious views with the endorsement of the government, which makes us feel like second class outsiders," Barker said.
Rather than having religious figures such as Warren and Lowery delivery the invocation and benediction at his inauguration, Barker suggested Barack Obama host a private religious ceremony.
Dan Barker, co-president, Freedom From Religion Foundation (photo: FFRF)
"... Defendants will have an invocation and benediction during the inauguration," the lawsuit states. "Both of these activities are completely exclusionary, showing absolute disrespect to Plaintiffs and others of similar religious views, who explicitly reject the purely religious claims that will be endorsed, i.e., (a) there exists a God, and (b) the United States government should pay homage to that God."
"Those people who do pray do believe in God and they are in fact trying to use the government to pick sides," Barker said. "In America we are free to disagree. We can disagree with Rev. Rick Warren but we're not free to ask our government to settle the argument."
But Peter Sprigg, vice president for policy at the Family Research Council, told Fox News the decision is up to Obama, not the government.
"The atheists, while they have every right to practice their atheism, they do not have an absolute right not to be exposed to viewpoints they don't agree with," he said. "So I think this lawsuit has no merit whatsoever."
Sprigg said Barker, Newdow and other atheists involved in the lawsuit are simply confused about the Constitution's meaning. He believes the suit will fail, just as Newdow was unsuccessful in his lawsuits to ban prayer at President George W. Bush's ceremonies in 2001 and 2005.
"These atheists who are suing to prevent prayer at the inauguration are showing a fundamental misunderstanding of what the First Amendment is all about," he told Fox News Radio." The establishment of religion that is forbidden by the First Amendment means the official declaration of an official national church. It doesn't mean that public ceremonies cannot include prayers or acknowledgement of the existence of God."
However, when asked if banning prayer would mean the government is favoring atheists over believers, Barker responded, "There is a difference between neutrality and hostility."
Newdow also recently lost a defamation complaint he had filed against a pastor who criticized him for his efforts to have "under God" removed from the Pledge of Allegiance.
The case had been brought against Rev. Austin Miles.
The case previously involved WND, the Internet's leading independent news site.
But shortly after naming WND as a defendant, Newdow agreed to drop the organization from the complaint.
The case, which originated about six years ago, alleged WND published a quote from Newdow that his daughter "was forced to recite, caused her emotional damage, stress, anxiety and a sense of being left out."
The lawsuit alleged the quote was never said by Newdow.
But WND did not publish the quotation, and Newdow quickly agreed to dismiss WND as a defendant.
Posted by Richard W. at 1:49 AM
Monday, January 5, 2009
"It is the duty of nations, as well as of men, to own their dependence upon the overruling power of God and to recognize the sublime truth announced in the Holy Scriptures and proven by all history, that those nations only are blessed whose God is the Lord.
Abraham Lincoln, sixteenth President of the United States
For now at this moment another year has gone by still with same old politics, greed and those getting away with murder with diplomatic immunities installed for any elected officials who has been granted power for doing the immoral things that continues to haunt America and bring us closer for GOD to justifiably bring judgment to this ONCE great nation UNDER GOD. IT has seemed that GOD has since the last elections and all the scandals being ignored because of it and all that follow it. And now since the ending of 2008 into 2009 war has broken out for this new President Elect. As well this same President Elect has not come clean in HIS citizenship questioning and lawsuits pending against HIM. And HEY none of the AMERICAN MEDIA seems to be truly REPORTING THIS IMPORTANT NEWS AND SCANDAL and the neglect of the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION concerning this IMPORTANT ISSUE. And into this next adventure there is still a GREAT deficit, economic disaster pending, social Ism to end our Democratic Republic once and for all, more paper money making that is worth nothing, the IRS and the FED still in control, wars and rumors of war, terrorism plots, same sex tyranny enforcement by the perverted under disguise of equality, pornography, the sick practice of ABORTION, old age euthanasia, and all downright acts of immorality tolerances that many stupid Americans continue to allow even to the point of losing their freedoms so they can stay comfortable.
I am so sick and tired of dishonesty tyrannizing our country when it comes to our Government. When will people in Government ever be HELD accountable for their dishonest actions and when will the MEDIA and the free press truly REPORT the TRUTH and quit trying to CONTROL what we are supposed to know? DO YOU NOT TRULY REALIZE THAT GOD WILL REVEAL EVERY EVIL WORK EVERY TIME YOU TRY TO CONCEAL THE TRUTH?
So have no fear of them; for nothing is concealed that will not be revealed, or kept secret that will not become known.
What part of this do they not understand? This TRUTH always comes to pass. It will be known to all every time many immoralist's try to think they can conceal the TRUTH.
And do they really think most of AMERICA is that stupid?
"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people, who have a right ... and a desire to know; but besides this, they have a right, an indisputable, unalienable, indefeasible, divine right to that most dreaded and envied kind of knowledge, I mean the characters and conduct of their rulers."
John Adams, second President of the United States
SO how long are they going to continue to THINK they can do wickedly and continue to conceal it?
For behold, the Lord is coming out of His place [heaven] to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity; the earth also will disclose the blood shed upon her and will no longer cover her slain and conceal her guilt.
On that day when, as my Gospel proclaims, God by Jesus Christ will judge men in regard to the things which they conceal (their hidden thoughts).
And it is amazing that many cannot or will not believe this FACTUAL truth. Nothing is ever relative. GOD's WORD STANDS ALONE in SCRIPTURE ALONE whether we (mankind) like it or not.
And not a creature exists that is concealed from His sight, but all things are open and exposed, naked and defenseless to the eyes of Him with Whom we have to do.
IT is also very amazing these persons think they will get away with this even to the point of saying GOD does not exist as they continue to do so they can try to justify their behavior and their lifestyles of all sorts they continue to indulge in to which they have to because their wickedness in sin owns them as it did those who were BORN FROM ABOVE and given the gift of Faith in Christ alone.
Jesus answered him, I assure you, most solemnly I tell you, that unless a person is born again (anew, from above), he cannot ever see (know, be acquainted with, and experience) the kingdom of God.
Blessed and fortunate and happy and spiritually prosperous (in that state in which the born-again child of God enjoys His favor and salvation) are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness (uprightness and right standing with God), for they shall be completely satisfied!
Knowing that GOD is complete control always, as to when will TRUE MORAL AMERICAN's wake up to the reality of the immorality around them that continues to PERVERT its way every minute in our daily lives and quit ignoring or tolerating the PERVERSION going on around them daily. WHAT ARE YOU TRULY AFRAID OF? Are you afraid you will lose everything like your possessions, creature comforts, etc etc if you make a stand against immorality that is ruining your comforts anyway? They already are stealing your possessions and you are just letting them. Does your lifestyle really matter to you that you would rather IGNORE and TOLERATE SIN and not be set free from just to keep what you have until death or to take them with you to your grave?
Just remember that TOMORROW IS NEVER GUARANTEED EVER. TODAY IS THE DAY OF SALVATION.
And it is time to stand gracefully but firm daily against all the perversions and those that tolerate them who continue to allow PERVERSION to run our country and the world for that matter. WILL you truly wake up READER?
1[a]BLESSED (HAPPY, fortunate, prosperous, and enviable) is the man who walks and lives not in the counsel of the ungodly [following their advice, their plans and purposes], nor stands [submissive and inactive] in the path where sinners walk, nor sits down [to relax and rest] where the scornful [and the mockers] gather.
2But his delight and desire are in the law of the Lord, and on His law (the precepts, the instructions, the teachings of God) he habitually meditates (ponders and studies) by day and by night.(A)
3And he shall be like a tree firmly planted [and tended] by the streams of water, ready to bring forth its fruit in its season; its leaf also shall not fade or wither; and everything he does shall prosper [and come to maturity].(B)
4Not so the wicked [those disobedient and living without God are not so]. But they are like the chaff [worthless, dead, without substance] which the wind drives away.
5Therefore the wicked [those disobedient and living without God] shall not stand [justified] in the judgment, nor [b]sinners in the congregation of the righteous [those who are upright and in right standing with God].
6For the Lord knows and is fully acquainted with the way of the righteous, but the way of the ungodly [those living outside God's will] shall perish (end in ruin and come to nought).
Warning with love
RICHARD WHITE JAN 1 2009
Posted by Richard W. at 12:25 AM