California's immoral support striking against Traditional marriage early??

(See article below after commentary)

Genesis 2:24
Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and shall become united and cleave to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

1 Corinthians 6:9
Do you not know that the unrighteous and the wrongdoers will not inherit or have any share in the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived (misled): neither the impure and immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor those who participate in homosexuality,...

COMMENTARY: It is still amazing to myself that this immoral SODOMITE AGENDA continues to parade itself consistently in every area Government and yet truly it is only technically legal because of the weasel-ness of the California Supreme courts immoral decision to portray their power trips over what WE the PEOPLE voted against with Prop. 22. and made it and These immoral honorable s are making us vote for this issue all over again. Wasn't one vote enough? Now we once again have to dot the "i" and cross the T's again to show these "immoralites" that Male and Female can only be ONE FLESH ALONE. That is marriage plain and simple. GOD created them (MALE AND FEMALE) to be the only UNION there could ever be. What part of that FACT do all the People, Lawmakers, Judges, Politicians, Governors, Senators, Congressman, Representatives, Presidential Candidates etc do not understand? What a big joke this all is and a harmful one at that. So my question to these Sodomites is still, WHY ARE YOU FORCING YOUR SINFUL PERVERTED BEHAVIOR TO BE ACCEPTED AS NORMAL WHEN IT IS FACTUALLY IMMORAL AND LEADS ONLY TO DESTRUCTION? This verse below explains it all and will never ever be void of the Truth.

ROMANS 1:23-32
26For this reason God gave them over and abandoned them to vile affections and degrading passions. For their women exchanged their natural function for an unnatural and abnormal one,

27And the men also turned from natural relations with women and were set ablaze (burning out, consumed) with lust for one another--men committing shameful acts with men and suffering in their own [d]bodies and personalities the inevitable consequences and penalty of their wrong-doing and going astray, which was [their] fitting retribution.

28And so, since they did not see fit to acknowledge God or approve of Him or consider Him worth the knowing, God gave them over to a base and condemned mind to do things not proper or decent but loathsome,

29Until they were filled (permeated and saturated) with every kind of unrighteousness, iniquity, grasping and covetous greed, and malice. [They were] full of envy and jealousy, murder, strife, deceit and treachery, ill will and cruel ways. [They were] secret backbiters and gossipers,

30Slanderers, hateful to and hating God, full of insolence, arrogance, [and] boasting; inventors of new forms of evil, disobedient and undutiful to parents.

31[They were] without understanding, conscienceless and faithless, heartless and loveless [and] merciless.

32Though they are fully aware of God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve to die, they not only do them themselves but approve and applaud others who practice them.

What part of these FACTS in the above verses do you not understand?

Richard G. White 9/10/08

California bans 'brides,' 'grooms'
License rejected for couple seeking traditional marriage (Worldnetdaily)

ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA -- "Brides" and "grooms" are no longer allowed to marry in the State of California. That privilege is only extended to individuals who allow themselves to be called "Party A" and "Party B" on marriage licenses. Pastor Doug Bird of Abundant Life Fellowship in Roseville, California, was alarmed to find the state now rejects the traditional terms after he officiated his first marriage ceremony last week following the California Supreme Court decision to overturn Proposition 22. The couple had written the words "bride" and "groom" next to "Party A" and "Party B" because they wanted to be legally recognized as husband and wife. However, the Placer County marriage license was denied. "I received back the license and a letter from the Placer County Clerk/Recorder stating that the license 'does not comply with California State registration laws,'" Bird said in a statement from the Pacific Justice Institute. It was an "unacceptable alteration," the County Recorder's Office claimed the State Office of Vital Records determined . . . Pacific Justice Institute President Brad Dacus said voters must change the state constitution by voting on the marriage amendment in November if they wish to preserve the traditional meaning of marriage. "Unless Proposition 8 is passed, heterosexual couples will be forced to wed out of the state if they wish to be officially identified as bride and groom or husband and wife." He said in a statement. "This is a major slap in the face for traditional marriage."